To: VanDeKoik
Yes, I know, which is why "lock her up" was in quotes.
If he wanted to pursue the matter, he would be calling for Congress to authorize a special prosecutor to look into the matter, and spend 5 years "Ken Starr-ing" Hillary.
He thinks that doing so would be detrimental in the long run for the country, and frankly, I might be leaning that way myself.
38 posted on
11/22/2016 11:43:43 AM PST by
Yo-Yo
(Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
To: Yo-Yo
Well right now he cant call for anything.
He has no legal presidential power.
People seriously have to remember that. This is a gray period of forming a government. He wont have any actual power until the end of January.
To: Yo-Yo
He thinks that doing so would be detrimental in the long run for the country, and frankly, I might be leaning that way myself.
Might be some truth in this. I was having this conversation last night with a good friend of mine. It's a political hot potato to be sure. The danger is giving the appearance that you're prosecuting your opponent because she ran against you.
I figure the way to do it is start slow, nail some low level types first. Do that for a while, get a few to turn state's evidence along the way, then nail someone important in the upper tier. Once you've done a couple of those, then go for the top.
50 posted on
11/22/2016 11:54:21 AM PST by
JamesP81
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson