Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VanDeKoik
Yes, I know, which is why "lock her up" was in quotes.

If he wanted to pursue the matter, he would be calling for Congress to authorize a special prosecutor to look into the matter, and spend 5 years "Ken Starr-ing" Hillary.

He thinks that doing so would be detrimental in the long run for the country, and frankly, I might be leaning that way myself.

38 posted on 11/22/2016 11:43:43 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: Yo-Yo

Well right now he cant call for anything.

He has no legal presidential power.

People seriously have to remember that. This is a gray period of forming a government. He wont have any actual power until the end of January.


42 posted on 11/22/2016 11:48:07 AM PST by VanDeKoik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: Yo-Yo
He thinks that doing so would be detrimental in the long run for the country, and frankly, I might be leaning that way myself.

Might be some truth in this. I was having this conversation last night with a good friend of mine. It's a political hot potato to be sure. The danger is giving the appearance that you're prosecuting your opponent because she ran against you.

I figure the way to do it is start slow, nail some low level types first. Do that for a while, get a few to turn state's evidence along the way, then nail someone important in the upper tier. Once you've done a couple of those, then go for the top.
50 posted on 11/22/2016 11:54:21 AM PST by JamesP81
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson