Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'We don't need the FCC': A Trump advisor's proposal to dissolve America's telecom watchdog
LA Times ^ | 11/24/16 | Brian Fung

Posted on 11/24/2016 2:46:48 AM PST by markomalley

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last
To: markomalley
NUKE THE UNCONSTITUTIONAL FCC

161 posted on 11/24/2016 8:38:59 AM PST by Jim W N
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hawthorn

Like I say, Coase notwithstanding, property rights are figured out very quickly in free markets. Ask the 49ers.


162 posted on 11/24/2016 8:56:48 AM PST by LS ("Castles Made of Sand, Fall in the Sea . . . Eventually" (Hendrix))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

The FCC role is to ensure “equal access” for Facebook, Google, Apple etc. They will continue to do the bidding of the content providers.

While the carriers labor away at their 2% margin on investment and are still forced to allow any competitor to use THEIR capital infrastructure to earn money without real investment. Or expertise.

Additionally, the carriers are disincentivized from investing to bring the most advanced of technologies...in fact precluded from doing so...which would allow of full convergence of transport technologies.

A single, nationwide network would be far more efficient, ripe for development, than the 3 independent networks in place today...TV, Internet, Telephone.


163 posted on 11/24/2016 8:58:07 AM PST by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

and wow the FCC has been so successful at keeping the filth off the airwaves, give ‘em a raise — NOT.
Never has this country seen a time with so much filth and lgbt garbage on the set as today. If the FCC can’t keep the public airwaves ‘moral family friendly’ then fire them all.


164 posted on 11/24/2016 8:59:25 AM PST by George from New England (escaped CT in 2006, now living north of Tampa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Freedom_Is_Not_Free

You got that 100% correct! They make their own laws through regs.


165 posted on 11/24/2016 9:14:00 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: b4its2late

Absolutely. We can reduce all of our alphabet agencies by half and have nothing but positive results. Heck, if we just eliminate the part of each bureau that politicizes we’ll be ahead.


166 posted on 11/24/2016 9:15:28 AM PST by LouAvul (The most High ruleth in the kingdom of men, and giveth it to whomsoever he will.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

You could turn all materials over to the ARRL and make them a quasi-government bureau. Maybe they’ll finally do something about 14.313.


167 posted on 11/24/2016 9:22:48 AM PST by struggle (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fai Mao

One, of many!


168 posted on 11/24/2016 9:28:59 AM PST by depressed in 06 (I'm going to have to come up with a new tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Roger on that. Been on since ‘63 and the FCC is the one to coordinate frequency allocations as there are international aspects involved. Not a simple free market answer. CUL SK


169 posted on 11/24/2016 9:38:34 AM PST by Blue_Spark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Focus Donald. EPA/Dept of Education/Department of Commerce gone in 90 days. Then focus on FCC.


170 posted on 11/24/2016 9:38:55 AM PST by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue_Spark

But the FCC should not care about what goes over those airwaves, the allocation aspect is what they should be doing.


171 posted on 11/24/2016 9:39:29 AM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: usconservative

40 and 80? They probably have a imported plasma TV with zero shielding. They throw out enough RF to give the viewer a tan.


172 posted on 11/24/2016 9:50:21 AM PST by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Well, that would be interesting in regards to amateur radio.

About the only thing the FCC comes even close to doing well is frequency allocation, though even that has issues. It could be handled with a handful of people in some cubicle somewhere.

173 posted on 11/24/2016 10:09:34 AM PST by zeugma (I'm going to get fat from all this schadenfreude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 21twelve
But - it sure looks like a hassle to get an FCC license.

Getting a HAM license is incredibly easy. You don't even have to know code anymore. A couple of 2-meter handhelds would reach further than you'd likely need.

174 posted on 11/24/2016 10:12:07 AM PST by zeugma (I'm going to get fat from all this schadenfreude)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

we don’t need the EPA.

I s’pose there is an argument for the FDA...foods and drugs cross state borders. And there is a vested national interest in having safe foods and drugs...but the agency should restrict itself to enforcing LAWS passed by the Congress.


175 posted on 11/24/2016 10:45:46 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

“...and most of that money was paid out in CASH.”

Well, that seems to be the problem. The cash was stolen.

Trump with Carson can drain the swamp in that agency.


176 posted on 11/24/2016 11:03:33 AM PST by Bronzy (America needs Trump to stop the insider gravy train. No insiders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

What about ‘Net Neutrality?’


177 posted on 11/24/2016 11:29:50 AM PST by bobcat62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: markomalley
Is it the FCC that is headed by Democrats 3-2 and it is considering regulating the internet as a utility, so that they can be the gate keepers of what is free speech and what is not?
178 posted on 11/24/2016 11:42:30 AM PST by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrEdd; Fixit
I agree.

It needs to be eliminated, along with the Corporation for Public Broadcasting.

179 posted on 11/24/2016 11:48:03 AM PST by OddLane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mazda77
This appears to be a severe trimming back of their mission back to its roots, which were as I recall for amateur radio licensing and technical accountability. Getting back to basics.

Alas, when you pull up an ugly weed, if you leave any part of it behind it will eventually grow back.

180 posted on 11/24/2016 12:10:16 PM PST by ElkGroveDan (My tagline is in the shop.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson