Jill Stein Can’t ‘Guarantee’ Money Will Go to Recount, Changes $$$ Goal

Law Newz ^ | November 25, 2016 | Rachel Stockman

[PJ-Comix]

Before you donate to Green Party candidate Jill Stein‘s effort to demand a recount in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, you may want to read the fine print on her website. So far, she has raised $4.8 million, but take a look at this little clause at the end of donation form:

[ptsal]

Beach house Jill

[TheStickman]

Tool much hand-wringing. They aren’t going to be able to “make” Trump lose. All of the “if this” & “if that” serves no useful purpose.

[phoneman08]

She has the money. Just waiting form the state to give her the estimate.

This will wind up in court, or just as likely the Wisconsin Legislature. Hillary, via Stein will challenge the recount results in court to prevent certification before the 12/13 deadline. No way even the recount is likely to be completed by then. Not with Dem PIA election lawyers on hand.

This is going to be a PIA all the way to 12/19 or beyond.

I’m spitting mad.

[Right_in_Virginia]

Thanks ... :-)

[Right-wing Librarian]

[txrefugee]

She wants a donation from the Clinton Crime Syndicate like Bernie got.

[Right Wing Assault]

Since Jilly said she would have done the same thing is Trump had been in the same situation, and since her reason is to make sure our elections are honest, she should give half the leftover proceeds after expenses to the Trump party.

Of course, the odds of leftovers, with all the greedy attorneys drawn like flies, is Zero.

[TheCipher]

Just read that Wisconsin is doing the recount for Stein, is it true or not?

Of course the Sec of State for Wisconsin, Doug La Follette, is a Democrat.

[HotHunt]

Stein is the straw person to collect the money (and pocket her %) and filing the papers for the recount in two states. But there's absolutely no reason to raise and spend that kind of money to request a recount for herself. She can't win with a recount. So she claims it's to protect the integrity of the system. I call that BS. All she wants is her cut for being the public face of this scam.

This recount is only going to potentially benefit one campaign, Clinton's. This is the hilLIARy operation trying to keep their hands from getting overtly dirty by having Stein be their bagman. But be certain, this is coming from the Loser Beast. It's either being funded by Soros or the Clinton Criminal Enterprise or both, funneled through a "legitimate fundraising" vehicle to barely mask what is really going on.

Waiting for the MSM to present their in-depth reporting here. Chirp, chirp, chirp....

[uncbob]

Hillary, via Stein will challenge the recount results in court to prevent certification before the 12/13 deadline

They tried to pull that in FLA and since there was no way the recount could be done in time it never started

Why would this be different

[mrsmith]

“I actually hopes she pulls off this scam. “

I do too.
It’s a million dollars just for Wisconsin ( a million dollars that won’t be spent effectively).

And

A. It won’t change Trump’s win in Wisconsin.
B. We’ll see how accurate the vote is.

[heights]

This is Not Jill Stein’s doing, this is Hillary, the women Trump wanted to be Kind to.

[phoneman08]

Took a Supreme Court ruling to put a stop to it.

[phoneman08]

Just have to shake my head in disgust with the MSM including FOX. “The Hillary Campaign denies they are involved”. No outrage from the media as even my dog knows that’s just not credible.

And where are the calls for Hillary to make a strong statement condemning this? Crickets of course.

And BTW, where is the pushback from the RNC, Republican lawmakers, and so far, because we know it’s coming, Trump himself?

[Liberty4California]

What business does Stein have in requesting a recount? She doesn’t seem to really have any standing. Not like she was going to win anyway. Why are they allowing this? What is the legal precedent for it?

[alloysteel]

There shall be no effective recount. If Herself could not get in enough fraud the first time around, not many more votes for Herself will ever be found.

Their only hope is to DISCREDIT more Trump voters. The paper trail does not favor that outcome.

And we ARE counting all the absentee ballots mailed in from the military stationed overseas, aren’t we?

[uncbob]

SCOTUS voted 7-2 saying they couldn’t cherry pick precincts and had to do the whole state

They voted 5-4 and said the recount had to be done by the deadline which would have been impossible so no recount

[ZULU]

The really sad part of it is these kids start out normal, but their are warped by TV, the movies, colleges, and now even the churches. It’s like a contagious mental disorder. Thank you and your son for his service. He should keep looking. Try to meet a girl from Hillsdale College.

[manc]

I will pass that on to him right now. He and 2 other friends are out in San Diego, and have no idea where to go.

[jonrick46]

I suspected the same thing. She is another scamming slut who wants money for nothing.Stein collects millions of dollars to fund election recounts and funnels most of it in offshore bank accounts. If she thinks the elections were hacked, she would do better if she made herself a tin foil hat for cheap. Any recount will do her no more good than that cheap tin foil hat, because this is all B.S. to line her pockets.