Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Naming a secretary of state
The Washington Times ^ | December 1, 2016 | David Keene

Posted on 12/04/2016 7:44:54 PM PST by detective

President-elect Donald Trump is having a heckuva time deciding on who to nominate as secretary of State. It began with former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani’s insistence that he wanted and deserves the job as payback for the yeoman work he did for candidate Trump when many leading Republicans were, shall we say, less than enthusiastic in their support of his fellow New Yorker. The mayor is an up-front sort of fellow, but trying to force a new president’s hand as he did is not always the best approach for a cabinet wannabe who might have a hard time being confirmed.

At any rate, Mr. Trump began interviewing others for the job as well and before much time had passed reporters were suggesting that just about anyone who boarded the elevator at Trump Towers was there to be interviewed for the job. Mr. Trump’s problem is that everyone being mentioned either knows little about the job or has more detractors than supporters outside the interview room. At the outset, former State Department official and U.N. Ambassador John Bolton was assumed to be on the short list. Mr. Bolton is incredibly popular with the conservative base, was a protege of both former Secretary of State James Baker and the late North Carolina Sen. Jesse Helms, served honorably in the administrations of both Bushes and Ronald Reagan and has, arguably, spent a lifetime preparing for the job.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: statedepartment; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: faithhopecharity

Bolton is a philosophical enemy of everything you believe id. RESEARCH IT!! This guy is no damned good to the bone!!


21 posted on 12/04/2016 8:16:45 PM PST by WENDLE (Cruz for the " Scalia seat" !!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Richard N. Haas


22 posted on 12/04/2016 8:20:01 PM PST by Lopeover (The 2016 Election is about allegiance to the United States!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

23 posted on 12/04/2016 8:28:33 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make US Intelligence great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

24 posted on 12/04/2016 8:28:50 PM PST by ASA Vet (Make US Intelligence great again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Lopeover
Nooo! Not Haas. He has a great resume, but the more you listen to him the less impressed you are with his intellect. He is incapable of original thought.

I like Bolton well enough. He's not perfect, and if he was for the Iraq War, so what! So was everyone else. Many assume things would have stayed the same if we hadn't gone in, but that's not likely. Regarding the chemical weapons—common knowledge they went to Syria. I don't understand why Bush has let the adverse coverage of his decision stand without fighting back for his legacy. The decision may not have been the best one in hindsight, but many were for that war, not just the “neocons.” Problem was leaders like Rumsfeld and Brenner. The war was won and then lost through mismanagement and perifidy.

25 posted on 12/04/2016 8:32:18 PM PST by binreadin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

I have been tracking my feeble brain and just don’t know. Those already mentioned would do. But, “Mr. Right” is out there and just hasn’t surfaced.


26 posted on 12/04/2016 8:43:50 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE; All

What do you think about Jon Kyl-AZ?


27 posted on 12/04/2016 8:53:21 PM PST by Finalapproach29er (luke 6:38)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

Not.
We don’t need a pro-homosexual anti-age of consent law activist ever.

I do not care now important The Stonewall Veteran’s Association and their agenda is to you Wendle, I don’t want one of their board members anywhere near foreign policy.


28 posted on 12/04/2016 8:53:22 PM PST by MrEdd (MrEdd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

He did, Three (3) times! Even though he is wrong. Bolton is the wise choice.


29 posted on 12/04/2016 10:33:33 PM PST by Shane (When Injustice Becomes Law, RESISTANCE Becomes DUTY.----T.Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: binreadin
I like Bolton well enough. He's not perfect, and if he was for the Iraq War, so what! So was everyone else.

Everyone?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3PJr2R28pas (2003)

30 posted on 12/04/2016 10:51:39 PM PST by cynwoody
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: detective

Thanks for posting.

Leave the position vacant.

LOCK HER UP!
LOCK HER UP!
LOCK HER UP!


31 posted on 12/05/2016 1:38:09 AM PST by PGalt (CONGRATULATIONS Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

What do you mean, “get a supporter”?


32 posted on 12/05/2016 4:17:57 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

IMO, which means nothing, Trump is carefully selecting the SoS since that position will be one of the most important people to convey his message to this world. Selecting someone like the horrible choices odumbo made (Hitlary, Kerry, etc.) would be a disaster of significant proportion. The SoS position IS an extension of Trump’s agenda, not some free wheeling grafter like Clinton was.


33 posted on 12/05/2016 4:57:15 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

IMO, which means nothing, Trump is carefully selecting the SoS since that position will be one of the most important people to convey his message to this world. Selecting someone like the horrible choices odumbo made (Hitlary, Kerry, etc.) would be a disaster of significant proportion. The SoS position IS an extension of Trump’s agenda, not some free wheeling grafter like Clinton was.


34 posted on 12/05/2016 4:57:16 AM PST by DaveA37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: DaveA37

That’s the way I see it. If there is anything that indicates to me Trump understands the nature of some of the problems he is going to face, it is his cabinet nominees. They are serious and talented, not political hacks.

Example: James Mattis vs. Ash Carter.


35 posted on 12/05/2016 5:01:35 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: rlmorel

Bolton is faux supporter. Bolton was endorsed by John Sanunu and lindsy Graham. Need I say more? These people are enemy traitors to Trump.


36 posted on 12/05/2016 9:22:06 AM PST by WENDLE (Cruz for the " Scalia seat" !!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WENDLE

I didn’t get your comment, I understand.


37 posted on 12/05/2016 9:52:23 AM PST by rlmorel (Orwell described Liberals when he wrote of those who "repudiate morality while laying claim to it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: elpadre

Newt Gingrich would suit me just fine.


38 posted on 12/05/2016 10:48:36 AM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson