Posted on 02/20/2017 7:57:17 AM PST by davikkm
Several of the organizations openly supported the Hillary Clinton campaign and worked to defeat Donald Trump.
On Saturday CPAC announced Milo Yiannopolous would be speaking at CPAC 2017.
On Sunday the #NeverTrump Reagan Battalion released very sordid audio of Milo Yiannopolous discussing sex and 13 year-olds. (For the record– Reagan Battalion blocked The Gateway Pundit from reading their tweets.)
Never trust a #NeverTrumper.
This is a disgusting story all the way around.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
[[The younger person does not yet have the maturity to make these decisions and the influence and interference from an older person makes it coercive.]]
Correction, it makes it criminal-
Nobody says embrace him. He is hard to take, but he is doing the culture a service in his outrageous way. The left hates him because he refuses to ***normalize*** homosexuality. He is “dangerous” to the left because of this. And it’s hard not to like him when you see him destroy nitwit activist professors at your hometown college-
I consider Milo a trojan horse who will open the door to depravity on the right.. I’m amazed how many conservatives have embrased him with open arms.
Why not let him speak at CPAC — as long as he agrees to avoid homo advocacy?
I like your post. I too as a mother want him to heal. I think he wants that too. As he would say, life is complicated and messy. It helps me when thinking of him and others in that life style as having same sex attraction. I don’t use the word “gay” or even “homosexual.” Those are static labels. I had a rather heated conversation with my granddaughter who knows a friend of ours who is “same sex attracted.” She said, “so really? You think that [.........] can like magically stop being gay?” I said, “yes, with grace and prayer. He can heal and find God.” I told her that [....] is a great guy and I value his friendship a lot but that I don’t think that his lifestyle is healthy although he does divide his time between skiing in the Grand Tetons and hanging out in Maui so its sort of hard to feel sorry for him. LOL and btw, he came out of the closet this year as a deplorable. yay. The other friend we have in this lifestyle and a distant relative are also deplorable.
cpac went poofy years ago. why this?
I like Milo. He is articulates many conservative policies very well, and is especially effective at reaching younger audiences.
He’s a good person to have in the big-tent of the right.
Well said.
I detest them. Worse than the left.
Alk conservatives should come up with their own fake news and make sure it’s over the top. Drop names all over. Talk about it on the phone and in emails. Make sure all those named are in on the gotcha joke and have them ready to go on tv to laugh in their faces.
Politics produces many odd and uneasy alliances, war even more so.
Milo has made it quite clear that he in no way supports or advocates pedophilia.
Like Stalin, you knew you needed him to win the war, but also that he was going to be a giant PITA once the war was over.
Hopefully that’s not going to be the case in this instance, but it’s certainly a possibility.
Oh-oh, looks like it’s time for another ideological purge. Who is running the book burning committee?
Me, too, never read or watched the guy. If he can rack up damage with the Left, great, but he must know his status of useful idiot, in the big picture.
I know. I wasn't accusing you. I'm referring to a lot of the men on here who regard teen boys sleeping with their female teacher with salacious amusement, but go into hysterics over the gay version of the same dynamic.
” He..... is especially effective at reaching younger audiences.”
Precisely.
However, I think you are misusing the word “audiences.”
Same here. Regardless of his bona fides in renouncing pederasty, the entirety of his non-mainstream lifestyle choices have been displayed and discussed in excruciating detail. Norms, as myself, are repulsed by it, and are distancing ourselves from the reality of his chosen lifestyle, even as we wish to applaud his stance on free speech. There are many, many more thoughtful, grounded people who can defend free speech without all the baggage of Milo’s lifestyle.
What word do you feel is more appropriate?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.