Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Susan Rice asked for "unmasking" for national security, source says
CBS News ^ | April 3, 2017 | Margaret Brennan

Posted on 04/03/2017 5:57:30 PM PDT by Trump20162020

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last
To: dp0622

And they say they are objective...what a load


41 posted on 04/03/2017 6:18:36 PM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

It’s all perfectly reasonable...

just like when placing a media mind-rapist’s head in a vice grip and squeezing until it pops like a giant pimple. Because otherwise we would not be able to prove there is no brain in there. Well, other than listening to their words. But that would be unconstitutional (cruel and unusual punishment).


42 posted on 04/03/2017 6:19:22 PM PDT by unlearner (So much winning !!! It's Trumptastic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

https://www.lifezette.com/polizette/susan-rice-exposed-unmasking-scandal/


43 posted on 04/03/2017 6:20:22 PM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

Rice herself back in March denied having any knowledge of unmasking, in regards to Trump.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VfRUItnjf3A


44 posted on 04/03/2017 6:21:06 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

I thought she already did deny it. Denied that she knew anything about it.

But then, why anybody would believe a word she says, after it’s been shown that she knew she was lying REPEATEDLY about Benghazi being a protest of a film?


45 posted on 04/03/2017 6:21:18 PM PDT by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

Sure, because:

“US Citizen A said that he’d build a wall on the border and make Mexico pay for it”

is SO difficult to comprehend, compared with:

“Donalt Trump said that he’d build a wall on the border and make Mexico pay for it”.


46 posted on 04/03/2017 6:21:37 PM PDT by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

“Names of Americans swept up incidentally in the collection of intelligence are normally masked, or kept redacted, in intelligence briefings. “

Incidentally?

If there were multiple video recordings of someone murdering someone in cold blood in broad daylight, multiple eye witnesses, a signed confession, and a public one on live TV, the journalists would still call the crime “alleged”.

But they state preposterous claims by their favored party as if they are facts.


47 posted on 04/03/2017 6:24:13 PM PDT by unlearner (So much winning !!! It's Trumptastic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24
Of course, it was their only go-to answer they had left.☺

But it won't work!!

48 posted on 04/03/2017 6:25:39 PM PDT by dragnet2 (Diversion and evasion are tools of deceit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

“important context for national security” What a farce.

National security was the cover for Obama political investigations done by intelligence agencies.

“Incidental” information gathering was the focus.


49 posted on 04/03/2017 6:28:54 PM PDT by grumpygresh (When will Soros be brought to justice? Crush the vermin, crush the Left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams
Went from never happened, to “here’s why” in nothing flat.

Correct.

50 posted on 04/03/2017 6:30:27 PM PDT by TTFlyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Trump20162020

The MSM is predictably circling the wagons around Rice. Did anyone expect anything different?


51 posted on 04/03/2017 6:30:31 PM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryan24

Yeah, that’s going to be their wiggle room. We spied on the opposition during campaign season because national security.


52 posted on 04/03/2017 6:31:45 PM PDT by Yardstick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Vendome

Oh my, Donna


53 posted on 04/03/2017 6:32:28 PM PDT by VTenigma (The Democrat party is the party of the mathematically challenged)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Yep. They are already making excuses for her


54 posted on 04/03/2017 6:33:47 PM PDT by Ymani Cricket (Pressure makes diamonds - General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: unlearner

The Dems / MSM have elevated the spin on this within less than 24 hours to CBS.

Think they’re worried ??


55 posted on 04/03/2017 6:35:11 PM PDT by Col Frank Slade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: GnuThere

So it seems like all this Russia hysteria may have been about laying a foundation for a national security defense for the politically motivated spying. The facts are starting to peep out from the misdirection and misinformation. If this is true, this is the biggest scandal ever. Makes Watergate look like a game of hide and go seek.


56 posted on 04/03/2017 6:35:41 PM PDT by maro (MAGA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: maro

Yes.
Meanwhile CNN is all about the SCOTUS vote, hahaha.
When Gorsuch is confirmed, they’ll need a new distraction by next week to avoid this issue.


57 posted on 04/03/2017 6:38:59 PM PDT by GnuThere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

Comment #58 Removed by Moderator

To: Hyman Roth

Maybe they never were objective.

Cronkite wasn’t.

I donnt know how the 40s and 50s were with news.


59 posted on 04/03/2017 6:48:59 PM PDT by dp0622 (The only thing an upper crust cIonservative hates more than a liberal is a middle class conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dp0622

I don’t either. I was born in 1970. I remember my Grandad loved watching CommiKrite. I was to young to realize what a turd Walter was


60 posted on 04/03/2017 6:52:02 PM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson