Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

China Reveals How Many Fighter Jets the New Aircraft Carrier Can Dock
Sputnik ^ | 05.04.2017

Posted on 04/07/2017 9:52:54 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

Edited on 04/07/2017 10:10:19 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

Chinese media has revealed that the new Chinese aircraft carrier will be able to dock 36 Jian-15 fighters [J-15].

According to Chinese news portal Sina,

(Excerpt) Read more at sputniknews.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Japan; News/Current Events; Russia
KEYWORDS: aerospace; aircraftcarrier; china; j15
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 04/07/2017 9:52:54 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Those plane markings are just one black triangle away from being radioactive.


2 posted on 04/07/2017 10:02:47 PM PDT by Rebelbase (Deportation mayhem is just birthing pains for a new America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rebelbase

It’s in the Pacific, it is radio active! Is the pacific roughly a 3rd of the worlds waters? Been bugging me....


3 posted on 04/07/2017 10:07:29 PM PDT by foundedonpurpose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki
In late December 2015, the Chinese Defense Ministry announced plans to construct a new Liaoning aircraft carrier built by China itself.

Built by China itself! So impressive! Uh, Japan has been building them for near a century. Attacked the USA back in the early 1940s with them (not just a single one, but lots built by Japan itself). And uh, quite a few other countries have built their own. Impressive Chinese feats, not!

4 posted on 04/07/2017 10:13:34 PM PDT by roadcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And how many F-35’s USS Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 can carry? How many simultaneous take off and landing (recover) USS Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 can handle at normal (not tilting in heavy seas)?


5 posted on 04/07/2017 10:23:35 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy

A quick google says 75+ airplanes.


6 posted on 04/07/2017 10:39:19 PM PDT by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts FDR's New Deal = obama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Look they built a toy carrier. How cute!


7 posted on 04/07/2017 10:41:03 PM PDT by RedWulf (#purge the nevertrumpers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy
F-35's? Zilch, ain't none deployed yet, and the Chinese J-15 would eat it for lunch.

Of course, if the navy ever came up with a true air superiority fighter like the F-22, maybe things would be different. F-35 was never intended to go against the likes of the J-15.

8 posted on 04/07/2017 10:50:43 PM PDT by doorgunner69
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

machines are machines and there examples of inferior machines defeating superior machines. pilots and training make the difference. i trust our pilots. wars will be fought elsewhere in the future.


9 posted on 04/07/2017 10:59:16 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (all your base are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We could recommission either the U.S.S. Lexington or U.S.S. Midway and they would both carry more fighter than this so called new (yet old designed) ReRussian Carrier, just stating facts.


10 posted on 04/07/2017 11:30:29 PM PDT by Trueblackman (Who knew Trump would cause tthis level of derangement among the Socialists, Liberals & Establements)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Welcome to the self licking ice cream cone club fellas you are 50 years late why don’t build some battleships why you at it.


11 posted on 04/07/2017 11:32:57 PM PDT by datricker (Democratic Party - aborting their voter base since 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kvanbrunt2

The mechannoyeds disagree


12 posted on 04/07/2017 11:34:49 PM PDT by datricker (Democratic Party - aborting their voter base since 1973)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: datricker

The mechannoyeds disagree>>> lololol


13 posted on 04/07/2017 11:40:32 PM PDT by kvanbrunt2 (all your base are belong to us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

It’s a surface ship and therefore second class.


14 posted on 04/07/2017 11:50:41 PM PDT by Az Joe (Gloria in excelsis Deo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe

Ok bubblehead, see if you can hit this with a torpedo;


15 posted on 04/08/2017 12:02:31 AM PDT by BlueDragon (I came upon Mother Goose So I turned her loose She was screaming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

I thought planes ‘’landed’’ and ships ‘’dock’’?


16 posted on 04/08/2017 3:44:11 AM PDT by jmacusa (Dad may be in charge but mom knows whats going on.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hamboy
How many simultaneous take off and landing (recover) USS Gerald R. Ford CVN-78 can handle at normal (not tilting in heavy seas)?

One. The Bush has four catapults but they only launch one plane at a time. One launch every few seconds. Likewise they land only one plane at a time. They don't conduct landings while they are launching and vice-versa.

17 posted on 04/08/2017 4:02:31 AM PDT by Lower Deck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

Ping


18 posted on 04/08/2017 4:11:20 AM PDT by StoneWall Brigade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Well if anyone knows how to fit a bunch of stuff on a boat, it’s the chinese.


19 posted on 04/08/2017 6:14:24 AM PDT by Pollard (TRUMP 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lower Deck

I didn’t ask Nimitz class, I was asking the newest Ford class, hello?


20 posted on 04/24/2017 10:57:17 PM PDT by hamboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson