Well the race to the left is on and here comes Dean up the back stretch.
Waters is a going to the inside.
They have to keep their base all “whacko” or they start losing money. It’s his turn.
Next week it will be someone else.
So tell me Mr. Dean, just who gets to decide what is or isn't "hate speech?" Because they become the de facto censors of all speech.
Howard, {SMH} are you really that stupid and short-sighted? Or are you just carrying water for the left's liberal fascist agenda?
Under the smiley face of a liberal is a fascist.
.....................................................
Well said.
Well, whattyaknow.
To liberals, the Constitution says whatever they want it to say.
The communist left hates our Bill of Rights. They bow to government. Dean is just another useful idiot.
Howard Dean is a liberal dumb ass...
Oh’ noes...I violated the first amendment.../ S
You would think Dean would actually know what the first amendment means and how it is applied..
Let's assume, for the sake of argument, that "hate speech" can be defined, and that Ann Coulter uses it.
We can then look at the Founders and how they used "hate speech" back in the day...for if the Founders did it and it wasn't struck down, I'd say it must be Constitutional.
Considerthe election of 1800 between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson's camp accused President Adams of having a "hideous hermaphroditical character, which has neither the force and firmness of a man, nor the gentleness and sensibility of a woman." . In return, Adams' men called Vice President Jefferson "a mean-spirited, low-lived fellow, the son of a half-breed Indian squaw, sired by a Virginia mulatto father."
No lawsuits, no snowflakes, and we all survived. So, again...um, no.
Howard, speech about Ann’s hate speech, is hate speech.
Howard Dean’s “Hate speech” is not protected by the First Amendment.
Go sh** in your hat, Howie.
The left are the true racists, bigots and fascists.
And Howard Dean is inciting riot and he knows it. These snowflakes believe it is acceptable to engage in violence to stop “hate speech”....which are just ideas they don’t agree with. The “hate” is in the eye of the beholder. I would argue the violence is the true exercise of hate, the irony seems lost on them.
In that case, neither is yours, Howie. See how that works? It’s why we allow idiots like you to talk.
Who is in charge of determining hate speech? I seem to have forgotten.
TRUTH: It’s the new HATE SPEECH.
I that’s the case, then nether is Howard Dean’s Speech.