Posted on 05/03/2017 7:27:11 AM PDT by blueyon
Kabuki
Finklesteen is up.
Comey well rehearsed....
Why is he screaming?
[Comey well rehearsed....]
theatrical award of the year!
He’s making a case for renewal of the 702
But, “properly trained”! What a bunch of BS!
Agreed. Too much shadiness in his past and just the fact that BO appointed him says it all. He didn’t put anybody in place that wasn’t corrupt and could be controlled. I would fire him.
Kabuki
_____________________
Weasel Theater at its best!
The question she started off with was written by Hillary Clinton.
Feinstein now trying to give ‘testimony’ instead of asking questions.
Feinstein accuses Comey of making Hillary lose by publicly announcing the results of his investigation.
Comey responds, I sent that in a private letter which your LEAKERS let out to the media.
Missed this from Comey :
Adam Housley on Twitter-
Comey says the FBI found classified emails forwarded from Hillary Clinton’s email by Huma Abedin to Anthony Weiner
Wow.
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3448923/posts
Powerline: The Clinton Factor
Powerline ^ | July 13, 2016 | SCOTT JOHNSON
A knowledgeable reader and longtime Power Line fan writes to say that he has enjoyed our coverage of the Hillary email case. He thought we might be interested in the perspective of someone inside the federal law enforcement community. He has worked as a federal agent for 20 years and been involved in hundreds of criminal investigations. He has made dozens of arrests and held Top Secret/SCI clearance for a long time. So, he writes, I have very extensive experience handling classified materials and info. Ill withhold additional details regarding his background to preserve his anonymity. He comments:
What really strikes me about the Clinton case (at least based on Director Comeys public statements), is
well
the FBIs curious lack of curiosity. By which I mean instead of approaching the case with a broad focus and following the evidence wherever it leads, which is the usual mode of operation, the FBI (again, based on publicly available information) seems to have deliberately kept the focus as narrow as possible. Their interests seem to have extended only to the questions of (a) was classified material mishandled and potentially compromised; and (b) if so, was there any criminal intent in doing so. Then, having satisfied themselves that the answer to (a) is yes, and (b) is no, they declare nothing further to see here, lets just move on folks.
Just the other day Judicial Watch found out there are MORE emails Hillary SENT that had classified information in them..”Judicial Watch: New Huma Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Sending and Receiving Classified Emails Through Unsecure Server” http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-huma-abedin-emails-reveal-additional-instances-clinton-sending-receiving-classified-emails-unsecure-server/
Good observation. Just came in and it was on. My BS meter went off immediately
“...FBI found classified e mails forwarded from Hillary by Huma Abedin to Anthony Weiner...”
Wow is right see my post #20; Comey stated the FBI ended up reading 6,000 of them and found no intent.
The FBI did not find intent! - this is serious enough that it should have been given to oversight committees in congress to determine intent.
Awful that the FBI “deemed” themselves the judge of intent here, given Comey’s brother’s ties to Clinton.
Grassley may be laying the foundation for another agency to investigate the top leadership at the FBI. Comey acknowledged that it has been done before.
What is the supposed context of the term “criminal intent”. What does that mean? Transmitting classified information in unclassified channels IS A CRIME. Did she do that knowingly and with intent. Of course she did.
So I assume Comey was looking for a conspiracy and didn’t find one. What else could it be?
Intent was Comey’s phony standard. Gross negligence is reason enough to prosecute her. It is in the law.
These degenerates have Kabuki theater down pretty well.
George Webb discussed how info was transferred between Blackberry networks.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uMtfif23zo
“...any criminal intent...”
Thanks for this further clarification.
Comey is resting his entire position on this ridiculous “intent” posturing crap just as he did before.
This is just ludicrous that he can claim “nothing to see here” because he and his fellow weasels decided for themselves that there was no intent.
The actions themselves were de facto intent!!! Comey has to go.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.