Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

LIVE STREAM: James Comey FBI Oversight Hearing Senate Judiciary Committee 5/3/17 (NOW)
youtube ^ | 5/03/17 | Live On Air News

Posted on 05/03/2017 7:27:11 AM PDT by blueyon

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Kabuki


21 posted on 05/03/2017 7:47:04 AM PDT by ColdOne ((I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11~ Best Election Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Finklesteen is up.


22 posted on 05/03/2017 7:47:44 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Comey well rehearsed....


23 posted on 05/03/2017 7:48:24 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Why is he screaming?


24 posted on 05/03/2017 7:49:15 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Road Warrior ‘04; ColdOne; All; Protect the Bill of Rights; Jane Long; hoosiermama

[Comey well rehearsed....]

theatrical award of the year!

He’s making a case for renewal of the 702


25 posted on 05/03/2017 7:51:11 AM PDT by Whenifhow (when, if and how will Obama be gone?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

But, “properly trained”! What a bunch of BS!


26 posted on 05/03/2017 7:52:10 AM PDT by Road Warrior ‘04 (Molon Labe! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: redcatcherb412

Agreed. Too much shadiness in his past and just the fact that BO appointed him says it all. He didn’t put anybody in place that wasn’t corrupt and could be controlled. I would fire him.

http://21stcenturywire.com/2016/07/13/fbi-director-comey-board-member-of-clinton-foundation-connected-bank-hsbc/


27 posted on 05/03/2017 7:52:34 AM PDT by MagnoliaB (You can't always get what you want but if you try sometime you might find, you get what you need.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ColdOne

Kabuki
_____________________

Weasel Theater at its best!


28 posted on 05/03/2017 7:53:13 AM PDT by Ms Mable
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

The question she started off with was written by Hillary Clinton.

Feinstein now trying to give ‘testimony’ instead of asking questions.

Feinstein accuses Comey of making Hillary lose by publicly announcing the results of his investigation.

Comey responds, I sent that in a private letter which your LEAKERS let out to the media.


29 posted on 05/03/2017 7:53:27 AM PDT by UCANSEE2 (Lost my tagline on Flight MH370. Sorry for the inconvenience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Road Warrior ‘04

Missed this from Comey :

Adam Housley on Twitter-
Comey says the FBI found classified emails forwarded from Hillary Clinton’s email by Huma Abedin to Anthony Weiner

Wow.


30 posted on 05/03/2017 7:53:44 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: stonehouse01
FLASHBACK:

http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3448923/posts

Powerline: The Clinton Factor
Powerline ^ | July 13, 2016 | SCOTT JOHNSON

A knowledgeable reader and “longtime Power Line fan” writes to say that he has enjoyed our coverage of the Hillary email case. He thought we “might be interested in the perspective of someone inside the federal law enforcement community.” He has worked as a federal agent for 20 years and been involved in hundreds of criminal investigations. He has made dozens of arrests and held Top Secret/SCI clearance for a long time. “So,” he writes, “I have very extensive experience handling classified materials and info.” I’ll withhold additional details regarding his background to preserve his anonymity. He comments:

What really strikes me about the Clinton case (at least based on Director Comey’s public statements), is… well… the FBI’s curious lack of curiosity. By which I mean instead of approaching the case with a broad focus and following the evidence wherever it leads, which is the usual mode of operation, the FBI (again, based on publicly available information) seems to have deliberately kept the focus as narrow as possible. Their interests seem to have extended only to the questions of (a) was classified material mishandled and potentially compromised; and (b) if so, was there any criminal intent in doing so. Then, having satisfied themselves that the answer to (a) is “yes,” and (b) is “no,” they declare “nothing further to see here, let’s just move on folks.”

31 posted on 05/03/2017 7:54:41 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Just the other day Judicial Watch found out there are MORE emails Hillary SENT that had classified information in them..”Judicial Watch: New Huma Abedin Emails Reveal Additional Instances of Clinton Sending and Receiving Classified Emails Through Unsecure Server” http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/judicial-watch-new-huma-abedin-emails-reveal-additional-instances-clinton-sending-receiving-classified-emails-unsecure-server/


32 posted on 05/03/2017 7:57:24 AM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow

Good observation. Just came in and it was on. My BS meter went off immediately


33 posted on 05/03/2017 7:58:46 AM PDT by hoosiermama (When you open your heart to patriotism, there is no room for prejudice.DJT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

“...FBI found classified e mails forwarded from Hillary by Huma Abedin to Anthony Weiner...”

Wow is right see my post #20; Comey stated the FBI ended up reading 6,000 of them and found no intent.

The FBI did not find intent! - this is serious enough that it should have been given to oversight committees in congress to determine intent.

Awful that the FBI “deemed” themselves the judge of intent here, given Comey’s brother’s ties to Clinton.


34 posted on 05/03/2017 7:59:08 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Comey said they were new emails. What was most interesting so far was the interchange between Grassley and Comey. Grassely obviously has some new information, which is why he got Comey on the record re the leaks. Also, there appears to be an email within the DOJ indicating that Lynch would not to too far on the Clinton investigation, i.e., the fix was in.

Grassley may be laying the foundation for another agency to investigate the top leadership at the FBI. Comey acknowledged that it has been done before.

35 posted on 05/03/2017 7:59:30 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: maggief

What is the supposed context of the term “criminal intent”. What does that mean? Transmitting classified information in unclassified channels IS A CRIME. Did she do that knowingly and with intent. Of course she did.

So I assume Comey was looking for a conspiracy and didn’t find one. What else could it be?


36 posted on 05/03/2017 8:05:03 AM PDT by InterceptPoint (Ted, you finally endorsed. About time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

Intent was Comey’s phony standard. Gross negligence is reason enough to prosecute her. It is in the law.


37 posted on 05/03/2017 8:06:50 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: InterceptPoint

These degenerates have Kabuki theater down pretty well.


38 posted on 05/03/2017 8:08:58 AM PDT by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation camp?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

George Webb discussed how info was transferred between Blackberry networks.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6uMtfif23zo


39 posted on 05/03/2017 8:10:28 AM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“...any criminal intent...”

Thanks for this further clarification.

Comey is resting his entire position on this ridiculous “intent” posturing crap just as he did before.

This is just ludicrous that he can claim “nothing to see here” because he and his fellow weasels decided for themselves that there was no intent.

The actions themselves were de facto intent!!! Comey has to go.


40 posted on 05/03/2017 8:11:11 AM PDT by stonehouse01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-158 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson