Posted on 06/26/2017 8:03:45 AM PDT by bar sin·is·ter
But Trump colluded with Russians./s
If you read the “fine” print in the articles, the entire ban is re-instated except for those that have family members here, visas to colleges or are going to give speeches. Therefore, refugees or others that don’t have any connection are BANNED. Second, three judges dissented because they would have allowed the entire ban to stand. Postponing it until October is sort of moot since the ban is for 90 days. To me, the Liberals are going crazy, the country is safer and that is a WIN.
WINNING!!!
Scotus told both circuits that they had their heads where the sun don’t shine
unanimous
“Did they reinstate the ban or consolidated all cases and will now hear it?
They lifted the lower court’s stays and allowed the administration to go ahead with the underlying processes Trump announced while they “calendar” the cases for a SCOTUS hearing.
Thanks. I should have found the opinion and read it myself instead of relying on Breitbart’s limited presentation.
BTTT!
From what we've heard so far, it seems like a reasonable approach. It's important that one Obama-appointee judge in Hawaii didn't get to over-rule the President of the United States.
The headline is incorrect.
There is no Travel Ban from Muslim Majority Countries unless Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Jordan, Turkey and a myriad of other Muslim Countries have been added to the list.
Your’re stuck on headlines, great.
None of that was in the article posted. A posted article should support the headline. This did not and therefore was garbage.
Correction. No word yet on vote. Not necessarily unanimous. I confused it with another case. Sorry.
The momentum can continue - now tell those aholes in congress no CR unless taxes, wall and whatever else on the listen.
As a buffaloian, I am offends by that truthful remark.
Yes, it’s a terribly worded headline. MSM at its best (worst). Oh wait, this is Breitbart, what’s wrong with them???
You posted two threads on this news this morning. The first from Breitbart, the second from Daily Caller.
The Breitbart content did not expound the claim of the headline. It merely stated that SCOTUS would ‘review’ the Travel ban rulings by lower courts. Therefore, for a person reading for the first time, the headline appeared misleading and some of the posts reflected the confusion.
The Daily Caller cleared it up. They noted that not only would SCOTUS review the lower court rulings on the subject but that they would stay the injunctions.
Daily Caller did a much better job.
9-0????
Nope, just pointing out what should be obvious to those who don’t get past the Headline.
WINNING!
Reinstated unless traveler can prove immediate relative in USA capable maintains them until full court hearing before the fall recess
Supremes rarely lift an injunction unless they feel the lower court will indeed be reversed
Three judges are already on record siding with Trump completely
Clarence Samuel and Neil
No way the lower court shenanigans which failed to cite statute survive
It had BETTER CONTINUE or we’re going into the same sewer the Brits have created for themselves.
The 10 minute video below recaps the dire — AND UNHEEDED — warnings issued by the late British statesman, Enoch Powell. We are watching them unfold as you read this.
Make no mistake: The bubble dwelling elitist leftists are engineering the same situation HERE!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bz8QfE1wlEM
Please share this with your friends and family!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.