Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP senator rips Trump over sugar deal with Mexico
The Hill ^ | 06/29/2017 | Mallory Shelbourne

Posted on 06/29/2017 10:47:44 AM PDT by GIdget2004

Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) on Thursday voiced his opposition to the Trump administration’s agreement with Mexico on the sugar trade, saying the deal increases the costs for consumers.

“I disagree—the new sugar deal hikes prices for consumers even more. Here’s why," Toomey wrote on Twitter, quoting a tweet from President Trump and linking to his own remarks on the agreement.

Trump early Thursday touted the deal on Twitter, saying it is “a very good one” for both countries.

“New Sugar deal negotiated with Mexico is a very good one for both Mexico and the U.S. Had no deal for many years which hurt U.S. badly,” Trump said.

But Toomey, who hails from the state that is home to The Hershey Company, a chocolate manufacturer, argued the “deal actually makes the problem worse,” referring to current sugar prices.

In a speech earlier this month on the Senate floor, Toomey slammed the agreement, saying it is bad for American consumers and workers.

“The fact is this is a bad deal for the United States. I am completely mystified as to why our Commerce Department would agree to it,” Toomey said at the time.

“It’s a bad deal for U.S. consumers, and we’re all consumers. It’s a bad deal for American workers. It completely fails to address the high price of sugar that we have in America today.”

(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2017 10:47:44 AM PDT by GIdget2004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

If we were to get rid of High Fructose Corn Syrup maybe the sugar market would stabilize.

I detest HFCS, I gain weight almost immediately when I consume it, and have lost 30 lbs by refusing to ingest anything that contains it.


2 posted on 06/29/2017 10:51:49 AM PDT by Ouderkirk (To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

——Toomey, who hails from the state that is home to The Hershey Company, a chocolate manufacturer, ——

Hershey moved manufacturing to Mexico

“HERSHEY, Pa. (PAI) – The next time you buy a package of Hershey’s candy kisses, take a good look at where they’re made before you put your money down.

Chances are, the answer is Mexico, not Hershey, Pennsylvania.

That’s because the iconic candy company closed its historic Hershey’s East plant in its namesake Pennsylvania town, idling some 600 Bakery Workers (BCTGM) members. There’s still another Hershey’s plant there, BCTGM researcher Matthew Clark, who tracks the candy company, told Press Associates.”

“In another blow to working families in the United States and Canada, the Hershey Company has announced that it will be closing multiple plants, cutting its workforce by 11.5 percent and moving jobs to a new plant in Monterey, Mexico.

This decision is yet another byproduct of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which, from its inception, has done more to erode the U.S. economy than perhaps any single piece of legislation in U.S. history.”


3 posted on 06/29/2017 10:53:31 AM PDT by bert (K.E.; N.P.; GOPc;WASP .... The Fourth Estate is the Fifth Column)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

So many candy makers including Mars and Life Savers, have fled to Canada and Brazil to avoid the sugar tariff. The tariff helps only the sugar growers in this country only.

If this deal with Mexico begins to get rid of the tariff, then all the better.


4 posted on 06/29/2017 10:53:56 AM PDT by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
But Toomey, who hails from the state that is home to The Hershey Company

If you try some European chocolate (Ritter Sport, for example), you'll discover that Hershey doesn't really produce "chocolate"...

5 posted on 06/29/2017 10:54:53 AM PDT by Cowboy Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bert

Beat me to it.


6 posted on 06/29/2017 10:56:03 AM PDT by WakeUpAndVote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

The US congressional subsidies are to blame for the universal shift to HFCS.

Stop subsidizing corn.

Sugar can hold it’s own.

Certainly there are millions who would pay more for products with sugar than with HFCS. You just can’t find them anymore.


7 posted on 06/29/2017 10:56:45 AM PDT by Mariner (War Criminal #18)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Does the deal end Federal subsidies for Big Sugar? Does it encourage competition?


8 posted on 06/29/2017 10:58:39 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper

If Hershey moved to Mexico why should Toomey care? Cuba goes capitalistic we open sugar imports to them. Florida gets angry.


9 posted on 06/29/2017 11:03:45 AM PDT by DIRTYSECRET (urope. Why do they put up with this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

A sweet problem: Princeton researchers find that high-fructose corn syrup prompts considerably more weight gain:

https://www.princeton.edu/news/2010/03/22/sweet-problem-princeton-researchers-find-high-fructose-corn-syrup-prompts


10 posted on 06/29/2017 11:05:36 AM PDT by Red Badger (Unless you eat The Bread of Life, you are toast!.......................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004
Toomey Speech June 13, 2017, Congressional Record S3445

US protectionism of its sugar industry is a long-standing issue.

11 posted on 06/29/2017 11:06:25 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Same here. I’m trying to give up sweets all together, natural or artificial. Just stopping soft drinks is a start.


12 posted on 06/29/2017 11:10:01 AM PDT by gattaca ("Government's first duty is to protect the people, not run their lives." Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Have we forgotten what happened in Iowa with Ethanol ? Cruz’s forthright position on crop subsidies in the heart of the cornbelt carried him. But he dropped it as an issue when continued his campaign.


13 posted on 06/29/2017 11:12:42 AM PDT by mosesdapoet (Mosesdapoet aka L.J.Keslinl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ouderkirk

Supposedly, the HFCS in one Dr. Pepper is 14 times more fattening than the same drink sweetened with sugar.


14 posted on 06/29/2017 11:14:42 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Hershey produces brown colored wax with some sugar in it.


15 posted on 06/29/2017 11:18:25 AM PDT by SkyDancer (You know they invented wheelbarrows to teach FAA inspectors to walk on their hind legs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"The US congressional subsidies are to blame ... "

I agree. We need to stop the subsidizing of Congressmen in all of it's many forms.

16 posted on 06/29/2017 11:20:11 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mariner
"The US congressional subsidies are to blame ... "

I agree. We need to stop the subsidizing of Congressmen in all of it's many forms.

17 posted on 06/29/2017 11:20:17 AM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bert

Hershey has been moving production to Mexico for at least fifteen years, and Toomey has run interference for them.


18 posted on 06/29/2017 11:25:38 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

IIRC, one of the features of the sugar agreement was to allow raw sugar imports from Mexico to continue relatively unimpeded, but to increase the U.S. share of the sugar processing market. I can’t remember if that was accomplished through higher tariffs on processed sugar or some other mechanism.

The main problem as I understood it from Secretary Ross, was that Mexico had to some extent created a vertical monopoly on the sugar supply by madking it difficult for American processers to buy raw sugar from Mexico for processing, forcing American companies to buy the end product from them, and cutting out American sugar processing plants from access.


19 posted on 06/29/2017 11:26:52 AM PDT by mbrfl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GIdget2004

Toomey, Hershey makes candy in Mexico...more than in Hershey, PA.


20 posted on 06/29/2017 11:29:16 AM PDT by Deplorable American1776 (Proud to be a DeplorableAmerican with a Deplorable Family...even the dog is DEPLORABLE :-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-46 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson