Skip to comments.The Democrats want to Judge America Racist to Destroy the Constitution.
Posted on 08/22/2017 9:31:06 AM PDT by CptnObvious
The Democrats want to Judge America Racist to Destroy the Constitution. That's why they're attacking the Founding Fathers; George Washington and Thomas Jefferson. Once they undermine them they can get rid of the Constitution and impose their Politically Correct Socialist State.
Their goal is to eliminate freedom and impose their rule over America.
The political correct terms Democratic and Republican became obsolete decades ago imo. What we have now is the corrupt uniparty.
Patriots need to remember in November 2018 and fire as much of the uniparty Congress as they can, electing new members of Congress that will support Pres. Trump.
Please come soon, Lord Jesus.
“The Republicans are joined by ISIS and the Taliban in their condemnation of the President while ignoring the communist anarchists.”
By now I wanted to see a massive list of challengers ready for the 2018 primaries.
We MUST primary out all the RINOs.
If we don’t, we’ll be in the same predicament in the Spring of 2019.
I wrote about this the other day. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2017/08/all_in_the_left_is_through_messing_around.html
Bingo! You have it exactly right.
Yes! Yes but this would take normalizing the extermination of the Constitution to a new level. At that point you will not be able to even mention the Constitution such as” well that’s against the Constitution” You’ll be attacked for being a racist if you mention the Constitution. After all that was written by a bunch of old white racist men. That’s when we lose our country it will be stolen from us. White people will then become evil if you mention America, the 4th of July, the Constitution or flyer flag you’ll be arrested if you have children or grandchildren you’re not going to be real happy about what they have to grow up in.
I will probably anger a few people by saying this but, within this atmosphere where some people want to get rid of the Constitution there are also other people who actually think that this would the perfect time to tinker with the Constitution in order to make it somehow better.
o tinker with the Constitution in order to make it somehow better
This rationale will be the basis for a Supreme Court judgment declaring vast swaths of the Constitution invalid, if we ever have the misfortune to have 5 Democrat appointees. People don’t realize how close America was to having a Judicial coup. Kennedy is a waffler, but for the most part he’s been fairly stable in terms of the big constitutional issues. Another Ginsburg would permit 5 judges to entirely rewrite the Constitution by “interpreting” it to fit their political agenda.
That both of you felt the need to qualify your statements, “right now”, bears out my assertion.
They suck but they suck less.
Perchance this clarification of my views will help a bit.
Think about two race horses.
One always runs the wrong way, never tires, and if it stumbles the same bookies who claim it’s a winner will cover it up. It will mindlessly trample anything it encounters running the other way too.
The other sometimes runs the wrong way, sometimes it doesn’t, but it’s a lazy critter and also one that frequently stumbles before it can ever cross the finish line even when it runs the right direction. It also has a habit of biting at any horse that runs the right direction when it’s running the right way (it’s super docile when it runs the wrong way).
The first horse is factually dangerous, for running the wrong way means horses sane people would bet on are constantly bring run over and injured by it.
The second horse is factually useless, as well as a constant irritant to better horses.
Now imagine the bookies have got together to make it very difficult to ever bet on another horse.
“Useless” without any dancing around it just plain sucks.
“Dangerous” is always worse than useless though.
And the handlers of the dangerous horse want to change the direction the race is run in to suit their horse and would be happy to ban any other horse from ever running against it. That includes the useless horse.
Problem is the handlers of the useless horse are just as useless as the horse is, and fancy the other handlers to be their friends.
“The other sometimes runs the wrong way, sometimes it doesnt, “
You really believe that the Republican Party has EVER run the right way in your lifetime? I don’t, and I look forward to it’s permanent replacement.
Running the right way all the time would mean them throwing FDR’s legacy of high handed lawlessness (and everything built on it) in the trash where it belongs.
Or AT LEAST telling the American people right out that they have not been governed by the Constitution, that FDR was a scumbag and “Mr No Repeal” Eisenhower ran on not honoring his oath of office, and present them with specific amendments to make aspects of that lawlessness legal ... and whatever fails goes away.
So “run” was probably too strong a word for when they move in the right direction, but they do occasionally move in the right direction (the Contract With America was one such time, and even THEN the so-called moderates had managed to derail the RNC within a few short years even without a Jumin’Jim Jeffords ... see “Not So Radical Republicans”, Reason, 1998: http://reason.com/archives/1998/07/01/not-so-radical-republicans ).
Fact is, the RNC doesn’t run anywhere. It’s laziness, that it ambles along, is a large part of both it’s uselessness.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.