Posted on 08/26/2017 4:41:31 PM PDT by Ennis85
This is all old news, old mud thrown at Sheriff Joe years ago by the La Raza-type maggots. The Slimes think this new volley of old cr@p will somehow lead to President Trump being removed from office.
Bwah hah hah let them throw their tantrums, nobody cares.
December 9th 2011
Why are you digging back 5 1/2 years for fake dirt?
Get it now?
Mud slinging by the Slimes
December 9th 2011
Why did you go back to an article from 2011 and post today?
I’ve been seeing this story being circulated on twitter right now in response to Trump’s pardon. Even though its an old article I thought it would have been a relevant time as any to post.
If you have something to say then say it.
Posting an article over 5 years old is OK if you are an expert on that article and have information that can show where that piece is correct or complete bullshit.
You posted it. Now you get to defend it, Doctor.
If you think it is relevant to Trumps pardon of Sheriff Joe you must explain why?
FReepers will not do the work for you.
Just fair advice.
IMHO, Trump just did what he should have never needed to.
Sheriff Joe was the best thing since AC in Arizona.
I suspect that this really means is that Arpao hired hard-nosed detectives who gave short shrift to pampered princesses with “recovered memories” or teenagers who didn’t like the grades they got and accused their teachers, and focused instead on the bloodied and battered victims weeping in the emergency rooms.
Pretty much what I was thinking as well.
Apparently the Special Victims office under him went from 5 to 3 detectives and were snowed under. 400 cases received inadequate attention. This was a terrible business which was subsequently investigated. Here is one such case with linked documents:
http://www.azfamily.com/story/19662091/rape-victim-opens-up-about-botched-mcso-investigation
Since this is considered newsworthy now, apparently, it should be noted that nationwide there are hundreds of thousands of unprocessed rape kits with serial rapists running loose making life a misery for many women. Many of whom live in Democratic strongholds. I wonder how strong those strongholds would be if the Feds cracked down on this particular denial of justice?
I didn’t know much about Arpaio until recently, I mean I knew had the reputation of America’s toughest sheriff and his stance on illegal immigration which I can sympathise with.
It was in recent days I have been hearing all kinds of rhetoric from both sides really about Arpaio’s character, the sex crimes controversy being one of the most damning I’ve been hearing against him (with John Schindler calling him a miserable human being for it).
After reading the article I felt the need to know whether there was more to the whole story other than New York Times spin. Even though it was an old article I thought I post it on freerepublic to see if I could get just that from the comments.
Sheriff Arpaio is the embodiment of law enforcement.
Phoenix was being ravaged during my time there and he put a stop to it.
Obama got in in 2007 and personally attacked him.
Obama is scum from the dregs of the Earth. Be careful on your Sheriff Joe posts here on FR.
The man believes in the rule of law. Obama attacked him and President Trump stopped it.
Story over. (AZ 1985-1999)
What you will never see is true facts.
I lived those days through-out the southwest with a top clearance.
It wasn’t quite as bad because cell phones were not around and the internet was years away. I was a Bulletin Board myself.
The lying will never stop. Watch the hearings for Justice Thomas. Watch how they claim RR was an idiot.
The left has nothing but Communism to throw at you.
Good Luck
Would love to see Trump appoint him to the FBI, Asst. Dir. or as HHS director.
If Russia didn't pan out and racist calls aren't picking up steam, then let's try to paint Arpaio as an enabler of sex crimes. Not a big leap from there to "Trump is pro-sex crimes". Harvey will be blamed on him before the rain even stops.
If Arpaio was a democRAT, they would be sweeping this crap under the rug like everything else they do.
What gives the NYT the stupid idea that anyone who enters a jurisdiction by criminal means -- and who has less than zero right to be there -- should be protected by the laws of that jurisdiction?
This is an outdated article printed by a paper that hates Sheriff Joe.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.