Posted on 10/28/2017 8:03:52 PM PDT by Enlightened1
RR can change Mulehead’s charge any time he wants to, in secret. We don’t know what he has done.
No they aren’t. Your entire argument gone in one sentence.
Further, news today confirms what I said. Investigation 2012-2013 offshore wires.
Way before Trump.
For someone that’s supposed to be in charge of the Justice Department, he doesn’t seem like he’s in charge.
Some people just don’t have it in them to be ‘in charge’.
Please add me to your ping list when you get a chance. Thanks!
It will never be The Big House for Hillary.
Maybe in American courts but judgment day is coming and these people frequently know enough about the Gospel to fake it when they have to fool less wicked voters ... so they are gonna be especially hurting unless they repent.
DOne
No. LS's comment was about "jurors", not "witnesses".
You should look it up.
(excerpt Rule 6)
(i) a grand juror;
You are wrong. Jurors are sworn to secrecy. See my above post. So then using your hyperbolic words, "your entire argument is gone in one sentence".
Further, news today confirms what I said. Investigation 2012-2013 offshore wires. Way before Trump.
My argument isn't that Mueller is going after Trump. Team Trump obviously hasn't done anything wrong. My argument is that Mueller is protecting Comey, Rosenstein, Obama, himself, other Deep Staters and maybe (I said maybe) Hillary.
And, according to the Grand Jury witnesses you’re wrong. There is NO WAY you investigate this if you’re “protecting” these people.
ANY, and I repeat, ANY loose thread you pull implicates them all.
Just the latest is the info that Manafort under investigation since 2004. I suspect he was flipped a long time ago, that this is show to prevent Swamp people from fleeing, shredding, and hammering.
Since I don’t recall (or really care) who said what, I’ll believe you when you said “you never said Muller is going after Trump.”
Odd, EVERYONE ELSE here has said that.
So let’s hope this isn’t a fall back position now that it’s clear he ISN’T going after Trump.
Your argument is Circular. The unnamed supposed Grand Jury witnesses say that something is true, therefor it is.
Go read the law. The law has been linked in this thread. I specifically cited the law. Grand Jurors are sworn to secrecy.
There is NO WAY you investigate this if you’re “protecting” these people.
Mueller and Comey have been investigating and dragging their feet since 2009. Rosenstein even prosecuted and gave some poor schlubs a plea deal several years ago.
That's the Mueller/Rosenstein/Holder/McCabe/Comey track record.
Yes. Mueller protecting the Deep State is my concern.
The informant's lawyer has asked Sessions for a Special Prosecutor to investigate Uranium One, not to investigate Trump. That's what I'm asking for.
And I DON’T want that info revealed.
Why do you want to taint a prosecution or make sure none of that can be used in court?
NO prosecutor wants his evidence out before the trial. Yes, the defendants know it. But you don’t go public with,
“We got a glove, we got blood evidence, we got . . . .” It just isn’t done.
Jeez, are you dense?
NO GRAND JURORS SPOKE.
The witnesses spoke. They are NOT under that law. They can speak to anyone. What part of that don’t you get?
Good graphic. Think I’ll forward it on.
But if Mueller at age 73 has become an honest cop it is the most amazing conversion since Constantine's before the battle of the Milvian Bridge (1705 years ago today--the battle, that is).
“honest” is a relative term in DC.
Let’s just say that there was so much corruption they couldn’t help but convict.
I hope the drive-bys are stunned Monday.
{:0)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.