Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bob Lutz: Kiss the good times goodbye' (No more cars)
Auto News.com ^ | Bob Lutz

Posted on 11/07/2017 8:24:03 AM PST by Hojczyk

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: Hojczyk

“will no longer be driven by humans because in 15 to 20 years — at the latest — human-driven vehicles will be legislated off the highways.”

Baloney.

And when i want to stop on the side of the road to look at an elk? And when kids wanna go across the grass to the edge of the lake to a make out spot? And by the way.... you better stop the upward totalitarian curve our government is on if you expect me to get into a module i don’t control.
You pop in the car and the doors lock and take me to the Homeland Security office? No thanks!


81 posted on 11/07/2017 10:45:40 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
As someone whose parents are getting older and older, I can see the benefits of self-driving cars.

Ditto for long-haul transportation, though the rail lobby will likely squash that idea.

But for everyone? Darned unlikely.

82 posted on 11/07/2017 10:49:25 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Are all city people completely, totally, batshit crazy?

Because this kind of talk is batshit crazy.


83 posted on 11/07/2017 10:51:54 AM PST by Augie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jobim
Remember the lin e from Tom Woolfe's The Right Stuff:

Monkeys will fly the next space launch

Diversity is our greatest strength !

84 posted on 11/07/2017 10:53:35 AM PST by Reverend Wright (The CBC: Deceiving Canadians since 1936.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Parley Baer

He also states the automobile as the prime mover of people the last 120 years. 120 years ago was 1897. In 1897 the prime mover of people was still horses (and trains). If he’d have said 110 years I could have let it slide, even though most rural areas still were horse and buggy/wagon in 1907.


85 posted on 11/07/2017 10:54:06 AM PST by John Milner (Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Maximum Bob, Keep programming ! Because 100 million lines of code is not enough.


86 posted on 11/07/2017 10:55:43 AM PST by Reverend Wright (The CBC: Deceiving Canadians since 1936.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SamAdams76
driving your own car will be a more expensive and less desirable option

yep. That'll be how it happens. No need for legislation, if costs 3 months' pay to insure yourself, then that will be the end of personal driving.

87 posted on 11/07/2017 10:56:29 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: John Milner

“He also states the automobile as the prime mover of people the last 120 years. 120 years ago was 1897. In 1897 the prime mover of people was still horses (and trains). If he’d have said 110 years I could have let it slide, even though most rural areas still were horse and buggy/wagon in 1907.”

You are correct.


88 posted on 11/07/2017 10:58:23 AM PST by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: John Milner
If you told a resident of NYC, circa 1897 or so, that the population of the city would be 10 times larger in 2017, one of the first things that would come to their mind would be "Where will they put all of the horses?".

Times change, but slowly and by degrees.

89 posted on 11/07/2017 11:00:08 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: John Milner

I should finish the thought .... Times change, but slowly and by degrees. Far more likely that 100 years into the future, the primary mode of transportation will be something that’s not even in existence, right now.


90 posted on 11/07/2017 11:01:33 AM PST by wbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: RegulatorCountry

Ok, I am glad he is a good guy and perhaps kook was too strong a word. But his timing is way off. It is interesting to speculate about the future but this automated driving thing is being pushed with almost religious fervor, something we have seen before with global warming and other fads and scares.


91 posted on 11/07/2017 11:04:37 AM PST by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: fuzzylogic

One of the big problems autonomous cars are having is recognizing when a policeman on foot is signalling for a stop.

Which is kind of a problem, especially in the USA.

Where, the sanctions for running a police roadblock are not just economic...


92 posted on 11/07/2017 11:08:55 AM PST by Reverend Wright (The CBC: Deceiving Canadians since 1936.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: discostu

I’ve seen (and talked to some of the people making )some preliminary plans on making cars that will fit onto a hyperloop between long destinations - say Boston to New York.

Drive your electric vehicle that has motors on each wheel with ultracapacitor energy storage that can be fully recharged in 15 minutes onto a hyperloop dock, ride that at 600 mph in 60 minutes to New York. Proof of concept is about 2 years out. this stuff is coming on FAST.


93 posted on 11/07/2017 11:13:24 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: wbill

Times don’t change slowly anymore. Disruptive tech always moves fast and everything in tech these days is disruption. The smartphone is 10 years old, streaming video is 12, TV shows being released on the internet solely is 4 years old. When smart cars hit it’ll be a smash transition. If something comes in to replace cars it’ll also be a fast transition.


94 posted on 11/07/2017 11:16:22 AM PST by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“will no longer be driven by humans because in 15 to 20 years — at the latest — human-driven vehicles will be legislated off the highways.”

Baloney.

And when i want to stop on the side of the road to look at an elk? And when kids wanna go across the grass to the edge of the lake to a make out spot? And by the way.... you better stop the upward totalitarian curve our government is on if you expect me to get into a module i don’t control.
You pop in the car and the doors lock and take me to the Homeland Security office? No thanks!

Time for a red barchetta


95 posted on 11/07/2017 11:16:45 AM PST by DesertRhino (Dog is man's best friend, and moslems hate dogs. Add that up. ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
"'Everyone will have 5 years to get their car off the road or sell it for scrap'"

Wait! Whatever happened to flying cars? Shouldn't we have at least gotten those first, BEFORE getting rid of our cars altogether? What a gyp!


96 posted on 11/07/2017 11:18:07 AM PST by catnipman ( Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reverend Wright

I’d look to V2X emergency protocols to assist here. That said, it’s not the stopping part, it’s the hand waving that signals to continue along.

These fringe use-cases are the barrier to L5 systems but I believe we’ll see L4 ones in the near future.


97 posted on 11/07/2017 11:22:22 AM PST by fuzzylogic (welfare state = sharing consequences of poor moral choices among everybody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: glorgau

The logistics of that are too massive. You’re talking about rebuilding the entire freeway system. It took us 50 years to finish phase one, and that didn’t have to be a power grid and vehicle controller.

Germany might redo the autobahn that way. Japan might be able to do it too. In America it’s a non-starter, by the time the project got 25% done the tech would have gone through 4 generations and the stuff we’d be laying down would be useless.

Smart cars are coming, and they’re coming fast. Smart roads are not.


98 posted on 11/07/2017 11:22:43 AM PST by discostu (Things are in their place, The heavens are secure, The whole thing explodes in my face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Paradox

God laughs...people still totally suck at predicting the future. They are wrong, almost universally. Yet more and more, the chattering head’s keep trying to say they know what’s going to happen. Pity poor Lutz, he’s now lumped in there with Al Gore.


99 posted on 11/07/2017 11:23:43 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: discostu

> The logistics of that are too massive. You’re talking about rebuilding the entire freeway system.

Nahh, not the entire freeway system. the hyperloop would run from downtown to downtown (theoretically) and the local commuting would go over the same old roads.

So, just the long distance jumps on a separate line. You could still drive it on the interstate, it would just take longer.


100 posted on 11/07/2017 11:26:33 AM PST by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson