Posted on 03/04/2018 5:11:53 AM PST by Kaslin
Democrats, in a feat of political exploitation unrivaled in the 21st century, are now using the kids from Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School to sign fundraising emails. Part of me had hoped the party of grave-dancing would find using children in this way would be a bridge too far, but the rest of me knew they didn’t have it in them to be tactful, decent people. After all, every left-wing activist group had, one day after the shooting, started sweeping into town to organize what they and their fellow travelers in the media all claimed was an “organic, grassroots” response to the tragedy. If they couldn’t wait 24 hours before attaching the marionette strings to those kids, the fact that they waited 2 weeks before attempting to use them to line their own pockets is as close to decency as they’re going to get.
With that in mind, and as liberals line up behind a shield made of children to march on the Second Amendment, it’s important to remember what happens when you attempt to compromise with people whose ultimate goal is your obliteration and why no amount of compromise will ever be enough.
There is an example from our recent past that shows how compromise works when it comes to big government liberals. It may not be perfect, and it isn’t pretty, but it is what happens when you accept the concept of diminishing the rights of innocent people over the actions of the guilty.
You have to dig in your heels and make clear you will never, ever acquiesce to their demands. This has been the tactic of the National Rifle Association when it comes to the Second Amendment, and it is the correct choice. But it hasn’t been the choice made by others in the past.
One particular group that has seen “compromise” used as a way to strip them of their rights is smokers. Now smokers aren’t exactly a group of people who are going to elicit a lot of sympathy or concern from people (junkies, sure, but people who use a legal product are fair game when it comes to attack, which is weird). But what happened to smokers is a useful tool for illustrating why the American people should not compromise with liberals when it comes to one of our fundamental freedoms.
Comedian and podcaster Adam Carolla has made this point many times on his show, so I can’t take credit for it. But it certainly exemplifies how a slope quickly becomes slippery and, if your interest is simply compromise, you can compromise your rights away.
To paraphrase Carolla, there was a time when you could smoke in restaurants. They are private property, and if the owner wanted to allow smoking, smoking was allowed. Then the government (liberals) decided smokers should be herded into their own area of a restaurant, the “smoking section.” So they went so smokers in the main dining room and said, “We’re going to need you to sit over here, in this side room You can smoke all you want, we just don’t want other people to smell it while they’re eating. You understand, right?”
Smokers, not wanting to cause a scene and knowing some non-smokers could be annoyed, happily complied.
Then the government comes back and says, “We’re going to need you to move to the bar area when you smoke. People are drinking there, and eating here, so it’d just be better if you moved over there.”
Smokers picked up their ashtrays, “Sure thing,” they said, and moved to the bar.
The government comes back and says they need smokers to step out front. “If you could just stand out front and smoke, that would be much better for everyone, OK? Don’t worry, there’s an awning and a heater, so you’ll be protected from the weather.”
Smokers picked up and moved outside.
“If you could move 50 feet from the door, that would be very helpful,” the government said next. “People smell smoke as they walk in the door and we don’t want that. Thanks.”
And now smokers are stuck down the block, wet and wondering how this happened. If someone had come up to them at first and said, “Hey, get down the street if you want to smoke,” it never would have happened, they wouldn’t have stood for it. But little by little, inch by inch, they moved because each move was small and seemed like a compromise.
Now smokers are never getting back inside, even if the owners of a bar or restaurant want them to. Their rights are gone, the private property rights of the owners are gone, and it was all done in the name of compromise.
There is no compromise with someone who doesn’t want you to exist, there is only incrementally losing ground until you no longer exist. A right diminished will never return, government does not cede back power once seized.
The NRA is right to hold its ground, it’s why the organization exists in the first place. Liberals are not honest brokers when it comes to the issue of guns, and neither is the media. Trying to appease leftists never works because nothing short of everything they want is ever enough for them.
If people who support the Second Amendment start to compromise with liberals whose ultimate goal is to strip everyone of their right to defend themselves, it won’t be too long before they’re out on the street in the rain with the smokers. Never give them an inch.
Truer words have never been delineated.
The property rights of restaurant owners are not the only ones that have been abridged. The crux of this matter is the stealth elimination (unconstitutional in its method) of the 2nd Amendment. One has only to look in horror at England and Australia to see whole populations of citizens bereft of their rights to self protection.
In these countries, examples abound where not only are citizens stripped of firearms, but their governments have criminalized any attempt at self defense.
I hope we, the people, do not surrender to such tyranny.
We already gave in. Lets not even talk about the actual laws, but lets talk about our minds and hearts.
When we called out for “Mental Health Issues” and even we have zero specific idea of what a mental health issue is - we’re opening that door.
It will only encourage them. Perhaps that is what the gun grabbers really want.
This article is spot on. If you point out the obvious true goal, they accuse you of making a straw man argument. We have to counter that with evidence of the true goal.
I find it kind of ironic that if the true goal was not total confiscation of all firearms, they might actually get some of the legislation that are proposing.
The “Look!”
LOL! Yup. THAT LOOK. The one that says you’re the scum of the earth. Cause you smoke, own guns, are conservative, disagree with “them”, etc., etc.,. Proudly wear it.
Not in recent years have the Aussie or Blokes had the “right” to protect themsleves.
But somebody will “have done something”. Yes, the walk the streets and they vote.
Did Ben Franklin say,
“Fart Proudly!”
You would go to jail now.
Absolutely. No expanded background checks. I do t want some BS where Feds can troll through medical records or controlled substances databases to look for “mental health” issues. That would destroy 2nd and 4th at the same time.
Hey, I smoked on a plane! I also smoked in the movies way back too.
If the left wants to get rid of crime and something that doesn’t help public safety, get rid of criminal correction. Bring back the death penalty and expand it.
I smoked
on the job in a clothing store
while shopping for groceries
while walking in a mall...if I ran out the tobacco store had singles for a dime.
LOL! Remember the (I think) little 4 packs the airlines would give out? And 9 out of 10 smoking docs preferred Camels or something? My how times have changed.
I never got freebies other than some samples being passed out in a mall about 1984.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.