Posted on 04/02/2018 9:10:47 AM PDT by C19fan
In this case, its safety by oppression, because they denounced safety by freedom.
From what I’ve been able to determine, the permitting process often takes months. They may have already scheduled an anti-gun march several months ago, and then took advantage of the shooting at Parkland school. As it was, the shooting occurred in the outer bands of the time window of the pre-scheduled march. To keep the march salient, they held impromptu “school walkouts” about 10 days before the march, just to keep the momentum for the “March for Our Lives” relevant.
Let’s up the ante a bit though. I do recall seeing some postings on the web over a year ago that the “Women’s March” of January 2017 was actually scheduled in August of 2016 and permitted sometime before the November 2016 election, with the expectation that Hilary would win. It was supposed to be a celebration and coronation of the US’s first woman president the day after Hilary would be helped up and down the steps on the inauguration platform to give her speech. Instead, history occurred and we Americans elected Trump into office instead. The already pre-scheduled march went on anyway, but was repurposed as a protest against Trump. I think a lot of the documentation about the original permitting of the “Women’s March” has been scrubbed from the web, however.
The left never lets an opportunity go to waste.
I just have to laugh.... So many of them are going to be red pilled by this...
Amen. I often think about those young men, none of whom chose to go to war, but did their duty anyway for all of us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.