Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Navy Will Extend All DDGs to a 45-Year Service Life; ‘No Destroyer Left Behind’ Officials Say
USNI News ^ | April 12, 2018 | Megan Eckstein

Posted on 04/12/2018 9:11:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

1 posted on 04/12/2018 9:11:52 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

We’re going to need them.


2 posted on 04/12/2018 9:15:51 PM PDT by null and void ("We don't let them have ideas. Why would we let them have guns?" ~ Joseph Stalin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Good move. Though less capable, the FFGs were retired at too early an age years ago.


3 posted on 04/12/2018 9:18:20 PM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Too late for Spruance/Kidd.


4 posted on 04/12/2018 9:35:35 PM PDT by Snickering Hound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Don’t forget the old Gearing class!


5 posted on 04/12/2018 10:05:12 PM PDT by longhorn too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Forget making more copies of the ill-conceived Zumwalt. That thing belongs in the same display case with the city softball shorts worn by the White Sox in the 70’s.


6 posted on 04/12/2018 10:22:24 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

The FFGs were retired because the hulls were literally worn out.


7 posted on 04/12/2018 10:34:39 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Snickering Hound

Even with life extensions, we would have been decommissioning Spruance/Kidds, at the latest, in 2019. Same reason - the hulls would be worn out.


8 posted on 04/12/2018 10:36:41 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: longhorn too

Sorry to burst your bubble, but the Gearing wouldn’t be good either. Not economically viable to upgrade it to where it could provide significant firepower or fight in sync with the rest of a modern carrier battle group - and without that, it is a gaping hole in CBG air defense and a munition magnet.


9 posted on 04/12/2018 10:39:26 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lurk

If war comes, and I believe it will be a naval war, we will need every hull we can send into harms way. We will need the ships and men to fight them. We will be turning yachts into gunboats. cruise ships into troop carriers, container ships into carriers (Drones & helicopters), and museum pieces into seagoing ships. The war be US vs Red China. With Japan and India playing a role (maybe Russia will join with China?) England and France will stay neutral—is my guess.


10 posted on 04/12/2018 10:45:54 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I just want to see more Balao-class submarines back in service.....


11 posted on 04/12/2018 11:27:08 PM PDT by SaveFerris (Luke 17:28 ... as it was in the days of Lot; they did eat, they drank, they bought, they sold ......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

This is good to hear.


12 posted on 04/13/2018 12:32:08 AM PDT by .44 Special (Tiamid Buarsh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

Now all they have to do is fix the massive training failures, not to mention spare part problems. Then they will actually have to find the deployable bodies to man the ships ...


13 posted on 04/13/2018 3:18:48 AM PDT by PIF (They came for me and mine ... now it is your turn ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

And meanwhile, NONE of the Little Crappy Ships will be able to make a deployment this year due to poor material conditions (i.e., broke or never actually worked), none of the miraculous ASW or MIW modules are operationally functional, and hiccups in the specialized training pipeline. Recommend all take a look at today’s edition of CDR Salamander. When senior personnel know the truth and refuse to acknowledge it, they are part of the problem, not the solution.


14 posted on 04/13/2018 4:03:29 AM PDT by Pecos (Better the one you have with you than the one you left at home.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

Then why were they bought up or given to navies all over the globe? I thought they were retired because there was a cost to upgrade missile systems and because at the time the navy was capped on the number of vessels.


15 posted on 04/13/2018 5:35:51 AM PDT by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: PIF

That is the bigger issue.

All the fancies gizmos in the world don’t help you if you are not able to get out of the way of a supertanker.


16 posted on 04/13/2018 5:38:30 AM PDT by redgolum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

What we really need to do is take and run with the Arsenal Ship concept.
Put a couple of those with each CBG, and we’ll have a good chance of defeating anything that attacks them.


17 posted on 04/13/2018 6:09:02 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sukhoi-30mki

A step toward cutting USN’s losses on the LCS?


18 posted on 04/13/2018 6:20:54 AM PDT by OKSooner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Magnum44

Um, most of them weren’t picked up by foreign navies. The supermajority were scrapped.

Turkey got eight from the US Navy and ended up having to completely rebuild them including replacing the hull plating. They could have had more but after realizing they’d basically bought the equivalent of a car that needs a complete frame off restoration they decided they didn’t want any more.

Poland got two and they’ve found they needed rebuild as well. Another “thanks but no thanks” situation.

Bahrain got one and didn’t want any more. Same thing with Pakistan - got one, supposed to get six, didn’t want any more. Egypt got six and last I recall was looking at decommissioning them as unserviceable soon.

You may be seeing a pattern.

The rest of the 51 OHP FFGs were scrapped or are to be scrapped. As I posted a couple months ago:

Some of them actually had hulls worn so thin (remember, this class was basically unarmored) that at the time they were decommissioned you could dent the hull with your fist or punch through it with a screwdriver. The shortest service life of one was about 15 years and they weren’t designed to take tech upgrades either.

Some of the few in better condition were sold off to foreign navies. Most were so bad off that there was no point to keeping or selling them and they were just scrapped. Of the 51 that served in the US Navy, we only have 12 in the mothball fleet - when they looked at reactivating 7-8 of them last year, they discovered that they would basically have to rebuild the ships with new hull plating and massive internal retrofits, which would not make economic sense. We were going to give two from the mothball fleet to the Mexican Navy and two to the Thai Navy, but during the examination prior to the transfer, the ships were found to be beyond repair and all four have been sunk as SINKEX targets or are awaiting disposal.


19 posted on 04/13/2018 10:56:27 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Yep.

5.56mm


20 posted on 04/13/2018 10:57:49 AM PDT by M Kehoe (THIS SPACE FOR RENT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson