Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Illinois Police Threaten to Kill K-9 Dogs if Marijuana Is Legalized
P.J. Media ^ | May 8, 2018 | Tyler O'Neil

Posted on 05/09/2018 4:52:51 AM PDT by grundle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: Tench_Coxe

You beat me to it.


21 posted on 05/09/2018 6:04:00 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: grundle

22 posted on 05/09/2018 6:11:38 AM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by "climate change" in urban customers' attitudes (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Seems popular...


23 posted on 05/09/2018 6:12:45 AM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by "climate change" in urban customers' attitudes (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

The anti-freedom types are resorting to extortion. Figures.
.........................................................

The ignorant types are resorting to gross generalizations. Figures.

If you want to go live on an island where smoking pot affects no one but you then by all means please do. But in the meantime I have a lifetime of experience that tells me that legalized pot, in my opinion, is a bad idea for society and that is how I would base my vote on it any time it is on a ballot. Am I allowed to have different opinions than you? Am I allowed to vote based on those opinions? And am I allowed to vote and voice those opinions without being labeled ‘anti’freedom’. Apparently not. Quite ironic.


24 posted on 05/09/2018 6:23:30 AM PDT by bramps (It's the Islam, stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: grundle

I’ve been around police dogs in the past and it appears to me that Assistant Police Chief Steve Petrilli is like most police chiefs, a highly educated administrator who has very little street experience. The solution could be as simple as getting a new dog trainer.


25 posted on 05/09/2018 6:24:37 AM PDT by excalibur21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I am sure there are jurisdictions i states the do not have Illinois’ budget for training these dogs that would be happy to take these dogs


26 posted on 05/09/2018 6:30:07 AM PDT by Nailbiter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps

I have never smoked pot and don’t intend to start.

But logic informs me that it is better to let idiots smoke the stuff than to compromise civil liberties. The freedoms lost in drug wars greatly exceed any damage the stupid potheads cause.

I am a right winger, so everybody is allowed whatever opinions they want. But you might as well understand that you are supporting civil asset seizures, gun control, no-knock warrants, and other totalitarian idiocy when you support continued prohibition.

I’d rather put up with the potheads.


27 posted on 05/09/2018 6:36:27 AM PDT by Little Ray (Freedom Before Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

LOL the first thing I thought of when I read this article was that magazine cover!


28 posted on 05/09/2018 6:36:58 AM PDT by beef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: bramps
I have a lifetime of experience that tells me that legalized pot, in my opinion, is a bad idea for society and that is how I would base my vote on it any time it is on a ballot.

So in your philosophy of government, anything that is "a bad idea for society" may properly be banned? If so, you've given the game away to the libs who say greed and poverty are bad for society and so must be combatted by government.

And am I allowed to vote and voice those opinions without being labeled ‘anti’freedom’.

No, you are not - your right to voice your opinion goes hand in hand with others' right to voice their opinions about your opinion. Maybe instead of whining, you should explain to us how your anti-pot views square with the conservative principles of freedom and limited government.

29 posted on 05/09/2018 6:39:59 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray
I have never smoked pot and don’t intend to start.

But logic informs me that it is better to let idiots smoke the stuff than to compromise civil liberties. The freedoms lost in drug wars greatly exceed any damage the stupid potheads cause.

I am a right winger, so everybody is allowed whatever opinions they want. But you might as well understand that you are supporting civil asset seizures, gun control, no-knock warrants, and other totalitarian idiocy when you support continued prohibition.

I’d rather put up with the potheads.

Amen! Well said.

30 posted on 05/09/2018 6:41:27 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Larner said many K-9s are trained not to be social.

Many shelter dogs have been trained by abuse and neglect not to be social - and nonetheless are successfully adopted. This scummy pig is holding his canines hostage.

31 posted on 05/09/2018 6:45:18 AM PDT by NobleFree ("law is often but the tyrant's will, and always so when it violates the right of an individual")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

Whether pot is legal or not, cops seem to like shooting dogs. *sigh*


32 posted on 05/09/2018 6:45:54 AM PDT by null and void (Urban "food deserts," are caused by "climate change" in urban customers' attitudes (H/T niteowl77))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle
Ridiculous. Are they not allowed to sell K-9s across state lines?


33 posted on 05/09/2018 6:47:23 AM PDT by yefragetuwrabrumuy (Liberals have become moralistic, dogmatic, sententious, self-righteous, pinch-faced prudes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

This is terrorism, is it not ?

“If you pass this law, we’ll shoot these dogs”


34 posted on 05/09/2018 6:48:09 AM PDT by Celerity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grundle

While the actual story is bad enough, the headline is excessive.


35 posted on 05/09/2018 6:48:23 AM PDT by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60's....You weren't really there)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“I have never smoked pot and don’t intend to start.

But logic informs me that it is better to let idiots smoke the stuff than to compromise civil liberties. The freedoms lost in drug wars greatly exceed any damage the stupid potheads cause.

I am a right winger, so everybody is allowed whatever opinions they want. But you might as well understand that you are supporting civil asset seizures, gun control, no-knock warrants, and other totalitarian idiocy when you support continued prohibition.

I’d rather put up with the potheads.

Amen! Well said.”

Second that. I am tired of living in a police state under the excuse that we are saving people from themselves.


36 posted on 05/09/2018 6:49:31 AM PDT by beef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

Another benefit is legalizing pot will reduce exposure to harder drugs via dealers. When I was young I watched many people get hooked on hard stuff that came from the same dealers. I’m not advocating legalization but it would be nice to cut a big portion of drug cartel revenues. Also of note I expect sometime soon anyone with a marijuana card will be placed on a no gun list.


37 posted on 05/09/2018 6:52:09 AM PDT by enduserindy ( I always smile when my competition doubles down on stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jospehm20

Exactly. They can use the dogs for target practice.


38 posted on 05/09/2018 6:54:10 AM PDT by Delta 21 (Build The Wall !! Jail The Cankle !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NobleFree

“I have never smoked pot and don’t intend to start.

But logic informs me that it is better to let idiots smoke the stuff than to compromise civil liberties. The freedoms lost in drug wars greatly exceed any damage the stupid potheads cause.

I am a right winger, so everybody is allowed whatever opinions they want. But you might as well understand that you are supporting civil asset seizures, gun control, no-knock warrants, and other totalitarian idiocy when you support continued prohibition.

I’d rather put up with the potheads.

Amen! Well said.”

Second that. I am tired of living in a police state under the excuse that we are saving people from themselves.


39 posted on 05/09/2018 6:54:52 AM PDT by beef
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: grundle
If euthanizing the dogs is how they want to deal with it, that's fine with me. The courts should never have allowed these animals to be used to generate probable cause, especially considering how horribly inaccurate they are. How does one confront his accuser when that accuser is a dog that was merely trying to please his trainer by 'alerting' for him at a stop?

It's not like they are going to be beating the dogs to death with sticks. Dogs and cats are euthanized humanely every day all over the country.

They aren't people folks.

40 posted on 05/09/2018 7:06:54 AM PDT by zeugma (Power without accountability is fertilizer for tyranny.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson