Posted on 05/09/2018 12:04:45 PM PDT by Bigtigermike
Basically Cohen is an whore who sells his services to anyone. The only question is whether Cohen has been compromised or not. The fact that Mueller avoided prosecuting Cohen for "Russian collusion" means your claim is false and Cohen is just an ordinary fixer.
You (Pox) are attributing a quote to heights that he did not make.
Name one.
That’s not true, it’s a database that thousands of people have access to. SAR
Viktor Vekselberg, Oleg Deripaska, Aras Agalarov, Dmitry Rybolovlev
Everyone on the campaign had deep and longstanding ties to Russia. It was the only thing a lot of them had in common. I’m so amazed that people refuse to see this.
He didn’t have normal business!
You mean like Mueller and Clinton?
This hooker ID’d one of her johns as the “stalker” and this guy accuses some random person of breaking a law that nobody heard of.
You own this hot mess, democrats..
EXCERPT:
“During college and law school, Avenatti worked for The Research Group, a campaign research firm founded by Rahm Emmanuel, former President Barack Obama’s chief of staff and the current Democratic mayor of Chicago.”
Yes he did have normal business -
until we know otherwise, why would anyone think something is abnormal? [unless predisposed/biased]
The thought struck me this morning. What if Trump were to go before the American people and say something to the effect:
“I’d like to clear up, once and for all, the rumors, innuendos and lies concerning any association I’ve had written Stormy Daniels. I can’t recall exactly when I first met her, but I do recall, several years ago, that there was some discussion about her going on The Apprentice. For one reason or another, she was not chosen for the show. I had no relationship with her then or after.
I even have a letter signed by her also stating this.
In 2016, during the heat of the campaign, her attorney apparently contacted my attorney to request money or else they would file a nuisance claim against me. She was now alleging that we had some kind of affair. Which we did not. The amount requested was small compared to the time, cost and overall duress it would cause me and my family. So, my attorney, Mr. Cohen paid her. She signed a non-disclosure clause that would forbid her from speaking about any relationship of any kind between us.
Then within the past year, Ms. Daniels hired another attorney, a Mr. Avenatti, who happens to be a blatant partisan activist for the democratic party. Mr. Avenatti makes all kinds of accusations directly and thru Ms. Daniels that are patently false and that violate the non-disclosure agreement.
Mr. Avanetti appears on various news networks, along with Ms. Daniels with their wild accusations against me. In fact, I understand that he’s appeared on TV more than 60 times. However, this pales in comparison to the fact that we now find out that he has obtained access to my attorney’s bank records from Robert Mueller’s team and perhaps also from the disgraced former New York AG, Eric Scheidermann (sp?)..
In short, this is an orchestrated effort on the part of Mr. Avenatti, Robert Mueller, fueled by the press to once again undermine my administration and bring stress to my family.
I have instructed my attorneys to vigorously file suits for defamation and breech of the non-disclosure agreement along with complaints to the various Professional Regulation authorities in the states where Mr. Avanetti has a law license, to sanction him for practice abuse.”
In other words, why doesn’t he come out and bash them back? This is clearly now part of the larger effort on Mueller’s part to do whatever is takes to bring down this president.
Does anybody know who is funding Avenatti?
I must say, it’s fun watching that a$$hole self destruct in realtime.
Avenatti was interviewed by either Jake Tapper or Chuck Todd last Sunday morning. Your exact question was posed to Avenatti. He squirmed in his chair and said (paraphrasing) "It wouldn't be appropriate for me to say whether we are being funded, and who that person might be."
Yet he made it obviously clear that someone is, by that statement.
And in the G-ddamned MEDIA! Since when did CNN and NBC become a courthouse? I don’t believe that the Cohen they’re targeting is guilty of anything, except association with Donald J. Trump.
What’s the difference? They’re all Jooos! and therefore guilty of something. (Seriously, let’s play this card. They’re never shy of crying ‘racist’ at the drop of a hat, or, where applicable, exploiting their nominal Jooo!ishness for nefarious purposes).
>> Avenatti, a two bit ambulance chaser <<
Avenatti may be a snake and a despicable character. But he’s anything but a “two bit” player. It would be a huge mistake to underestimate him. He has a very impressive record both as a lawyer and a racecar driver.
(Among other things, he was an associate of Daniel Petrocelli, he of OJ-case fame. And there’s much more. You can look it up.)
Therefore, it’s clear that when Soros and Company decided to use Ms. Stephanie Clifford as a major “piece” of their bringdowntrump strategy, they chose a very formidable lawyer. PDJT would do well to have an attorney this skillful on his team, in place of a worn-out bumbler like Rudy.
>> How is Avenatti gaining access to the Lexis Nexus Accurant data base of the DOJ and FBI? <<
Might not be the source. More likely IMHO is that some low-level employee in the Treasury Dept. is scanning bank reports for the info. That’s why the Inspector Gen. of the Treasury Dept. is on the case.
I'm not ready to draw that conclusion yet. Hoping he is really the modern day Columbo, only in lawyer form.
LOL!
>> I’m not ready to draw that conclusion yet <<
If you were falsely accused by the cops of some crime, financial or otherwise, would you prefer to be represented by a partially demented old coot like Rudy?
Or by a ferocious younger lawyer of the Avenatti type?
I think the question answers itself.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.