Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many studies’ results cannot be reproduced, scholars warn
The College Fix ^ | 5-10-18 | <ark McGreal

Posted on 05/10/2018 9:09:20 AM PDT by DeweyCA

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: immadashell
When was the discipline of Scientific Method, that was drummed into my head at every high school science fair, rejected?

I first remember being taught the basics of the Scientific Method in fourth grade (late 60s) and it was beaten into me all the way through my Masters program in Physics (mid 80s). Even in the 80s nincompoops were publishing garbage about Global Cooling using junk science and bad statistics.

I think it really became prevalent in the mid to late 90s.

41 posted on 05/10/2018 12:50:32 PM PDT by OldMissileer (Atlas, Titan, Minuteman, PK. Winners of the Cold War)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
Science = Reproducable

Not Reproducable = Not Science


42 posted on 05/10/2018 1:16:50 PM PDT by Paal Gulli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA
It took a Study to come to this conclusion? LOL
43 posted on 05/10/2018 7:15:18 PM PDT by gigster (Cogito, Ergo, Ronaldus Magnus Conservatus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

Good article. I have read something like this before, and I am also quite familiar with John Ionnnaitis and his work on the failure of replicating much scientific work. Journals are not interested in publishing “null tests.” They are not nearly as “sexy” as studies that purport to have discovered some amazing new insight. People forget that scientists are “fallen” people, just like the rest of us. As such, they are susceptible to the same temptations of pursuing fame and fortune as the rest of us.


44 posted on 05/10/2018 11:56:18 PM PDT by DeweyCA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

“Many studies can’t be replicated, study says.”


45 posted on 05/10/2018 11:58:24 PM PDT by Yaelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Used to have a subscription.


46 posted on 05/12/2018 1:44:42 AM PDT by P.O.E. (Pray for America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: DeweyCA

I saw this first hand in 1967. I was a lab technician in a products research lab. The company required “blind” testing before approval of any new product introduction. A very sweet food product was being advocated by a product manager and I got assigned to the “blind” panel set up. They used church groups to insure no contact between the product people and the actual subjects. The study was cancelled twice and went forward only when it was assigned to a large, mostly black church. I later learned that women of color are about twice as likely to prefer “very sweet” to “somewhat sweet.” Hence rigging of the “blind” test.

The product was well liked by the church ladies, was introduced with much fanfare, but ended up a complete flop.

So, even private industry has been rigging the statistics for a very long time.


47 posted on 05/12/2018 2:26:28 AM PDT by anton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson