Posted on 05/29/2018 10:40:53 AM PDT by upchuck
The wireless industry is in a race to roll out 5G service. The network is supposed to be up to 100 times faster than current data speeds, but it requires cellphone tower equipment to be closer to users than before. Wireless companies in the U.S. say they’ll have to install about 300,000 new antennas – roughly equal to the total number of cell towers built over the past three decades. That’s causing outrage and alarm in some neighborhoods, as antennas go up around homes.
(Excerpt) Read more at newyork.cbslocal.com ...
And a credentialed health expert in the long term effects of EMF...
Dozens of studies indicate 5G is a significant health risk:
https://ehtrust.org/key-issues/cell-phoneswireless/5g-networks-iot-scientific-overview-human-health-risks/
I don’t need faster. How about just give me reliable service instead of my phone constantly losing signal. I have an old flip phone. Are new smart phones any better for reliability? Is that why my phone is constantly losing signal, or is this just a given for all phones, including the latest once?
That should take care of the local bees.
Why would they need new towers?
Wouldn’t they just put new antennas on the existing towers?
Whenever I see the word ‘ENVIRONMENTAL’ in someone’s title, study or organization, I automatically consider such people biased toward whatever government teat they happen to be sucking on.....................
EHT sounds like an activist group, do we know that?
Most people don’t realize how close they are to small cells already.
They are literally everywhere and you likely are within 25 yards of one at every point of your day if you live in the city or urbanized area.
Anyone who thinks they can avoid it is crazy.
I’m sorry, but you are 100% incorrect.
Where I live, I probably won’t have to worry about it for at least 20 years. I’m just lucky FR supports the telegraph. Those smoke signals were real low bandwidth.
YIKES!
Losing service is a result of an overworked network. Practically everyone uses data technology on their phones now, where 10 years ago, most people just relied on voice or text. the network is clogged up, especially for suburban areas where towers are necessary and supply is short.
This article is discussing new small cell towers. These are much different than steel towers. Small cell towers are typically on roof tops, on street posts, or can be as small as a broom. they only have the ability to hold 1 or 2 customer antennas at a time and used for penetration of frequency more than range.
A guy down the road from us got upset he didn’t have any coverage so rented out his land for every tower under the sun. Guess he’ll put up another one now. Bet he can’t walk out in his backyard without getting an instant tan.
RB, as an expert electronic technician who worked in gov’t communication closets, you should have the final word on 5G microwave spectrum EMF health concerns for the rest of us.
Unless people would like to hear what HUNDREDS credentialed RF & health sciences scientists say about the need for more study in light of the 29 studies that indicate considerable health threat to the populace having high power 5G microwave spectrum transcievers mounted on lightposts just outside their homes...
https://emfscientist.org/index.php/emf-scientist-appeal
USA
Dr. Martin Blank, Ph.D., Columbia University, USA
Prof. Jim Burch, MS, Ph.D., Dept. of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, USA
Prof. David O. Carpenter, MD, Director, Institute for Health and the Environment, University of New York at Albany, USA
Prof. Prof. Simona Carrubba, Ph.D., Biophysics, Daemen College, Women & Children’s Hospital of Buffalo Neurology Dept., USA
Dr. Zoreh Davanipour, D.V.M., Ph.D., Friends Research Institute, USA
Dr. Devra Davis, Ph.D., MPH, President, Environmental Health Trust; Fellow, American College of Epidemiology, USA
Paul Raymond Doyon, EMRS, MAT, MA , Doyon Independent Research Associates, USA
Prof. Om P. Gandhi, Ph.D., Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Utah, USA
Prof. Beatrice Golomb, MD, Ph.D., University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, USA
Dr. Martha R. Herbert, MD, Ph.D., Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, USA
Dr . Gunnar Heuser, M.D., Ph.D., F.A.C.P. Emeritus member, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA; Former Assistant Clinical Professor, UCLA; Former member, Brain Research Institute, UCLA. USA
Dr. Donald Hillman, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Michigan State University, USA
Elizabeth Kelley, MA, Fmr. Managing Secretariat, ICEMS, Italy; Director, EMFscientist.org, USA
Dr. Ronald N. Kostoff, Ph.D., Gainesville, VA, USA
Neha Kumar, Founder, Nonionizing Electromagnetic Radiation Shielding Alternatives, Pvt. Ltd; B.Tech - Industrial Biotech., USA
Dr. Henry Lai, Ph.D., University of Washington, USA
B. Blake Levitt, medical/science journalist, former New York Times contributor, EMF researcher and author, USA
Prof. Trevor G. Marshall, PhD, Autoimmunity Research Foundation, USA
Dr. Albert M. Manville, II, Ph.D. and C.W.B., Adj. Professor, Johns Hopkins University Krieger Graduate School of Arts & Sciences; Migratory Bird Management, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service, USA
Dr. Andrew Marino, J.D., Ph.D., Retired Professor, LSU Health Sciences Center, USA
Dr. Marko Markov, Ph.D., President, Research International, Buffalo, New York, USA
Dr. Jeffrey L. Marrongelle, DC, CCN, President/Managing Partner of BioEnergiMed LLC, USA
Dr. Ronald Melnick, PhD, Senior Toxicologist, (Retired, leader of the NTP’s health effects studies of cell phone radio frequency radiation) US National Toxicology Program, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, USA
Dr. Samuel Milham, MD, MPH, USA
L. Lloyd Morgan, Environmental Health Trust, USA
Dr. Joel M. Moskowitz, Ph.D., School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, USA
Dr. Martin L. Pall, Ph.D., Professor Emeritus, Biochemistry & Basic Medical Sciences, Washington State University, USA
Dr. Jerry L. Phillips, Ph.D. University of Colorado, USA
Dr. William J. Rea, M.D., Environmental Health Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
Camilla Rees, MBA, Electromagnetichealth.org; CEO, Wide Angle Health, LLC, USA
Prof. Narenda P. Singh, MD, University of Washington, USA
Prof. Eugene Sobel, Ph.D., Retired, School of Medicine, University of Southern California, USA
David Stetzer, Stetzer Electric, Inc., Blair, Wisconsin, USA
Dr. Lisa Tully, Ph.D., Energy Medicine Research Institute, Boulder, CO, USA
Supporting Scientists who have published peer reviewed papers in related fields
Olga Ameixa, PhD. Post-Doctoral Researcher, Dept. of Biology & CESAM, University of Aveiro Campus., Universitário de Santiago, Portugal
Michele Casciani, MA, Environmental Science, President/Chief Executive Officer, Salvator Mundi International Hospital, Rome, Italy
Enrico Corsetti, Engineer, Research Director, Salvator Mundi International Hospital, Rome, Italy
Jacques Testart, Biologist, Honorary Research Director at I.N.S.E.R.M. (French National Medical Research Institute), France
Xin Li, PhD candidate MSc, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, New Jersey, USA
Dr. Carlos A. Loredo Ritter, MD, Pediatrician, Pediatric Neurologist, President, Restoration Physics, North American Sleep Medicine Society, USADr.
Robin Maytum, PhD, Senior Lecturer in Biological Science, University of Bedfordshire, Luton, UK
Prof. Dr. Raúl A. Montenegro, Ph.D, Evolutionary Biology, National University of Cordoba; President, FUNAM; Recognitions: Scientific Investigation Award from University of Buenos Aires, UNEP ‘Global 500’ Award (Brussels, Belgium), the Nuclear Free Future Award (Salzburg, Austria), and Alternative Nobel Prize (Right Livelihood Award, Sweden), Argentina.
Dr. Hugo Schooneveld, PhD, Biologist, Neuroscientist, Adviser to the Dutch EHS Foundation, Netherlands
Dr. Carmen Adella Sirbu, MD, Neurology, Lecturer, Titu Matorescu University, Romania
Concern for those with pacemakers?
Cancer is a $3 billion industry. Doctors, oncologists and the polticians bought by the oncology industry are rolling in the dough. So it seems feasable they would looking for ways for more people to get cancer.
Proof please. Cite clinical studies done by reputable research centers.
Also please explain why FCC Part 15 and Industry Canada RSS-GEN permit radiation at 4W EIRP on the 2.4 GHz band if it causes brain tumors.
Nope. Pacemakers are no longer the frail things they used to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.