Skip to comments.
Ex-FBI lawyer Page agrees to testify before House this week
[Lisa Page]
The Hill ^
| 07/12/18
| Olivia Beavers
Posted on 07/12/2018 10:24:55 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
My guess is they negotiated a memorandum of understanding (MOU) so she's safe to testify.
To: yesthatjallen
Wanted to hear what her lover had to say first.
To: yesthatjallen
Now she’ll just parrot everything that sneaky Pete said. Meh...
3
posted on
07/12/2018 10:26:32 AM PDT
by
Harpotoo
To: Buckeye McFrog
She was worried about what would happen if she didn’t. I’d ask her: Was it good?
4
posted on
07/12/2018 10:26:55 AM PDT
by
DIRTYSECRET
(urope. Why do they put up with this.)
To: yesthatjallen
Regardless of her words, can we seat her with Peter side by side? This way we can confirm each other easily and the sight is lovely as well
5
posted on
07/12/2018 10:27:26 AM PDT
by
Lee25
To: yesthatjallen
6
posted on
07/12/2018 10:30:02 AM PDT
by
FrdmLvr
To: yesthatjallen
ridiculous. our leaders need more backbone.
7
posted on
07/12/2018 10:30:40 AM PDT
by
b4me
(God Bless the USA)
To: Buckeye McFrog
“Wanted to hear what her lover had to say first.”
Has anyone EVER provided any evidence they were lovers?
To: Buckeye McFrog
DING! DING! DING! WE HAVE A WINNAH!......................
9
posted on
07/12/2018 10:33:14 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
To: yesthatjallen
Inside a Wal-Mart with a big pile of stones for whatever Wal Mart stench shoppers may want to do with them as she appears?
10
posted on
07/12/2018 10:37:13 AM PDT
by
blackdog
To: Red Badger
And the democrats are going to improperly release his private testimony so that she can read it before she testifies. Totally corrupt.
11
posted on
07/12/2018 10:38:38 AM PDT
by
Williams
(Stop tolerating the intolerant.)
To: yesthatjallen
Its amazing what a subpoena and a groups of US Marshals can do.
12
posted on
07/12/2018 10:41:26 AM PDT
by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: yesthatjallen
If Page is questioned 'behind closed doors', the committeeman can have unlimited time to ask her questions. If on camera and in an open setting, each committeeman is allowed only a few minutes of questioning. I would rather she be "interviewed" behind closed doors to begin with. I don't suppose Elijah will do little more than apologize for her inconvenience of having to be there.
13
posted on
07/12/2018 10:42:21 AM PDT
by
yoe
To: Williams
They will probably let her listen to the tape...............
14
posted on
07/12/2018 10:42:55 AM PDT
by
Red Badger
(July 2018 - the month the world discovered the TRUTH......Q Anon)
To: Buckeye McFrog
Exactly. She’s sitting back, taking lots of notes. These ‘RAT criminals always get away with their crimes. :-(
15
posted on
07/12/2018 10:44:33 AM PDT
by
nutmeg
To: yesthatjallen
Wasted effort and the GOP is being played as fools.
16
posted on
07/12/2018 10:45:33 AM PDT
by
Zathras
To: Williams
Think about the productivity and revenues around the swamp lately among firms normally shaking down the whole globe. Right now they are their own customer and cost of sales. They have been employing thousands of former Obama - Bush- Clinton loyalists to go after one target. Trump.
Trump has effectively isolated them in purpose and intent. Trump is making them consume themselves.
17
posted on
07/12/2018 10:45:42 AM PDT
by
blackdog
To: yesthatjallen
And it’s the opinion of a lot on Fox that she dragged her feet long enough on coming to testify that now she’s been able to hear what Strzok had to say in his open testimony today, so that now she can adjust her testimony whenever she comes to fit his - monumental blunder by the ‘pubs.....
To: nutmeg
I wish someone like Judicial Watch would do an FOIA request for their time sheets. They could not have possibly sent and received all of the texts on breaks or lunches. It would be interesting to see if either Lisa or Peter used personal leave or vacation time corresponding with their text activities. Failing to do so could be considered an act of fraud which victimized the taxpayers of America. It would really be funny if either of these partisan Hacks claimed any overtime while concentrating on texts instead of work.
19
posted on
07/12/2018 10:47:31 AM PDT
by
BOBWADE
(RINOs suck)
To: yesthatjallen
She got the transcripts leaked so she can prepare?
20
posted on
07/12/2018 10:52:41 AM PDT
by
1Old Pro
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson