Posted on 10/17/2018 5:48:42 PM PDT by dontreadthis
Do you have the absentee ballot figures for 2016?
He seems to be better at crunching numbers than predictions.
He promoted for months Mulehead was working to help Trump.
And to “Trust Sessions”.
What nonsense.
Hey ! Good news! :)
“would it not be safe to assume that they were all voting on issues rated to Justice K? I think so.”
If not ‘safe’, certainly intelligent.
Still, I think Trump has support that isn’t captured in polls because of it’s novelty. The ‘likely voter’ is more Republican than pollsters assume (and that assumption is all-important).
No way to differentiate of course. The result would be the same either way. Here’s hoping!
As I recall Rollins made similar predictions in 2016. We all know how that turned out.
Larry really knows how to make a guy feel good.
Anyone that said ‘Trust sessions’ after he first recused himself over a year and a half ago, has little to no credibility left.
Rollins had said in earlier shows that we would hold the House. Gingrich says we are going to hold the House.
Yup...he’s lost a lot on his fastball.
I know. Rollins is all over the map.
If we win 4-5 seats, no way we lose the House.
LS = Larry Schweikart, a long time FReeper and respected author who crunched numbers for 45, quite accurately I might add. He kept us sane in Nov 2016.
Einstein flunked an entrance exam.
We are way beyond holding the Senate, we are going to win seats in the Senate. Rollins is clueless.
“I have no idea who LS is”
He’s poster “LS” on FreeRepublic. Author and political analyst Larry Schweikart. You can Google him. Request to be added to his Ping List if you want good info.
Basically that more Republicans are voting than are Democrats, and Republicans are even voting more than they did in the 2016 Presidential election. At least that is what I am getting from it. But to be honest it was a quick review of what he had to say. Not sure why LS could not give that kind of summary.
Can somebody give a quick rundown/summary of his conclusions? If so, thanks. I’m not big on scrolling through a string of tweets.
“At least that is what I am getting from it.”
—
Appreciate your attempt at analyzing the tweetstorm anyway!
I think the recent amount of money the Democrats raised has shaken him. He is an old timer how thinks money means success in politics. He forgets that Hillary spent over a billion and Jeb Bush 100 million.
in general, R’s are up and D’s are down in their returned ballots thus far compared to 2016 and 2014
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.