Posted on 04/03/2024 2:27:10 PM PDT by thegagline
I already addressed this in numerous ways. Let me readdress the ways one more time for you. They insisted that we follow the science, meaning their science, not actual science. They stifled those who were actually in the science field of virology who tried to present real science to discussion, because the narrative being pushed was not science at all. It was a propaganda campaign to promote an untested mRNA vaccine that had zero history, as this was the first foray into this new vaccine. The people taking them became the test subjects. They impugned those who tried to correct the narrative calling them quacks, just like you called Dr. Stella Immanuel, because she happened to believe in aliens, even though you have no facts that they don't exist other than your beliefs. I happen to share that belief with you, but I don't discount it nor do I belittle people who do believe it, because I honestly do not know what the truth is. My reality is that I have never experienced or seen any evidence to support the existence of beings from outer space.
But since you are a judgmental person who believes you know it all, can't even be honest on that front. However, you can't judge a person's qualifications in their field of expertise, based solely upon their beliefs on other topics.
Fr example you are clearly a democrat, but you refuse to be honest even about that. Instead you play these little games of deceit. What exactly is your motivation?
But back to why liberals deserve more condemnation for the vaccines than does Donald Trump.
They accused those who refused to have an experimental vaccine that they swore without equivocation that they were both safe & effective, yet evidence kept cropping up that neither claim was true. Then came the coordinated campaign of attacking those refusing the vaccines, stating they were the cause for the continued spread of the Covid virus. These people were also vilified in public and became targets of ridicule and even recipients of threats of violence. This campaigned was supported by the press, as well as, the social media platforms. We knew that the press was an extension of the Democrat Party, and we began to suspect that the social media platforms were also involved. After Elon Muck bought the crime scene known as twitter, that suspicion was confirmed.
While every Democrat swore that they would not take these untested vaccines before the FDA approval was granted, after the stolen election, all Democrats magically transformed their tunes in unison that these vaccines would save the world, and they would now not only become available for use for those who desired the possibility of protection, they mandated that every American take the vaccine or face the consequences of being isolated from society. They tried to forcibly institute vaccine passports. In places like New York City they actually did try to make that requirement law. They forced establishments to enforce it or deny them service. However, they eventually, with great reluctance had to backout of that tyrannical edict. There are many more examples of this nonsense, but I think what I have provided shows clearly that the liberals deserve far more special attention to the subject than does Donald Trump.
2) Her intent is to taint one side and not also include her side is often involved and just as complicit. Remember. 98% of the truth is still a lie. So she’s rapidly losing my trust.
The side she "tainted" as you said, was in fact her side you dimwitted Democrat minion. She saw the truth, while you still deny the truth. You really need to proof read you stuff because this statement makes little sense:
Finally, with Trump’s alternative medications, you’ll notice none were working see to treat him. Why?
More stupidity, if I am understanding what you were trying to say.
The reality is that it was being administered by doctors who had more concern about their patients than they did about what might happen to them career wise. It even helped Trump when he got it. It helped a black female democrat politician in Michigan who used the protocol to rid herself of the Covid virus. She thanked & praised Trump for mentioning it. She was vilified for doing so I might add, by ideologs idiots who believe like you do, that you liberals have all the solutions. In reality, however, installing the solutions have proven many times over that the solutions you provide more often than not make small problems into much larger problems. Our bid cities are excellent examples that prove what I speak.
The Lancet, a weekly peer-reviewed general medical journal and one of the oldest of its kind. Wrote a hit piece on hydroxychloroquine based upon a study done at a VA hospital that was used as proof of its dangers. However, it had to be retracted when it was revealed that the VA hospital had purposely overdosed their patients to intentional produce the results that they presented to collaborate the danger. This was a conspiracy on a scale that many perceived to be an impossible feat to carry off successfully. But in reality it is evidence that a large-scale conspiracy can indeed be successfully executed.
But of course, you don't see this. BTW, I do agree with you that presenting only 98% of the truth is still a lie, and it's for that very reason I can with fear of bearing false witness, proclaim that you are a serial liar, because nothing you ever present is the entire truth. You always present partial truths hoping that I can't respond to & point out, your intentional omissions to deceive.
3) He’s not conservative. He’s alt conservative. He’s effectively another Soros. Buying those who can carry out his worldview. Supporting Pizzagate’s Posobiec or Trump attorney Eastman who you’ll notice never says Trump is right. Just vigorously representing him.
Whatever he is, there are millions of Americans that like & appreciate his leadership. Since you are a Democrat I am not surprised that you attach the alt-right label upon him. It's also why you will never understand why he receives this massive support. It's not a cult, it's the genuine & sincere love that he has for this nation & those citizens who also genuinely & sincerely love this nation also. It's that commonality that is the glue. In addition, we have finally gotten a leader who has the capacity, as well as, the tenacity to fight these haters of our nation.
To end, your attempt to deflect away from the claim I make that you are in reality a Democrat supporter, you add the obligatory accusation that he is another Soros in your feeble attempt to keep the charade going. No one buys your subterfuge, so you can give it up, but you won't.
As for Jack Posobiec, this is yet another clear example of you using the dreaded whataboutism that you Zelenskyy/Ukraine supporters always claim that we use.
Eastman was sent by Klingenstein to keep Trump in office whether he won or not to carry out his worldview. I have trouble with that. I know that a lot of people here don’t have a problem with it. Are you one of those who are ok with Trump staying in office whether was the actual winner.
Care to provide proof of your claim? I've never heard that one before. I would be interested in seeing that claim. Until then I have no information to even speak on that claim, so I won't.
This is all very similiar to the stuff put out by Jeremiah Films, James Dale Davidson and Joseph Farah in the 90’s.
While not intimately familiar with the first two you mentioned, I do know Joseph Farah who created World Net Daily. I have no objection to him. I did look up Jeremiah Films, and found that they distributed The Clinton Chronicles, which contains a list of people who were linked to President Bill Clinton who either died mysteriously or who was murdered. So I can understand your disdain for them. After all, that's a clear attack on the man that sends tingles up your leg, and the beard for Hillary Clinton.
So then I looked up James Dale Davidson, who made predictions. He was right in his predictions, his timing was way off though. Oh well, he can see the future but his timing sucked. The fact that we were still the sole superpower in the world, meant that we wouldn't fall that quickly.
Yes, I am fine with the actual election winner remaining in office, you imbecile.
Just because yo are a reality denier who has no real evidence that the election wasn't stolen, but have been provided the cover to ignore all the evidence that was presented in the public court of opinion but was never allowed to be properly adjudicated in the court systems.
Those few cases that were allowed to be adjudicated all went in favor of Trump.
Any attack on the Chomo Democrats is an attack on joeschomos of FR.
I hate auto correct, as it often does it when I hit send. I was noting when Trump got Covid, none of the treatments he was touting were used in his treatment. Hydroxychoriquin wasn’t used. And the question is why?
I have no use for Soros. And I have no use for people like Klingenstein. Their elisltist wealth gives them the ability not only to tilt the scales, but put their thumb on it. As to Eastman, how did he and Trump get linked? And why has he never said Trump’s claims are correct?
As far as what you claim I am, that’s your call. I do admit I’ve moved over the years, largely due to stuff like this.
Agsin there’s a large segment of conservatives who don’t care what the election determined who the winner was. The rest mounting that mattered was Trump should have had his second term. Legally or not. I hear that often. I hear that in committee meetings. I hear that at candidate forums.
Irrelevant & immaterial as well. He didn't force it on anyone, he never tried to ruin the career or impugn anyone who rejected or talked down the available vaccine. He would have never mandated it.
I was noting when Trump got Covid, none of the treatments he was touting were used in his treatment. Hydroxychoriquin wasn’t used. And the question is why?
You question that because you don't know the truth. He did indeed use it. There was nothing else to use. In fact, he took Hydroxychloroquine as a prophylactic as well, but he either must not have been following the correct protocols or he lapsed in taking in on a continual basis.
I hate auto correct, as it often does it when I hit send.
Perhaps you need to disable it then, because it's not doing any good, as you have multiple misspellings. 7 in fact, that I counted, 4 within the very first highlighted entry from you, 1 in the second highlighted entry from you, 1 that follows this response by me, and 1 from the last highlighted entry from you. I thought perhaps, like me, you have macular degeneration or some other issue that impedes your ability to see correctly.
I have no use for Soros. And I have no use for people like Klingenstein. Their elisltist wealth gives them the ability not only to tilt the scales, but put their thumb on it. As to Eastman, how did he and Trump get linked? And why has he never said Trump’s claims are correct?
So you say, Tom Klingenstein seems like a person who is influencing the conservative causes. I guess as a Democrat you would fond objection to him, but you never speak badly about Zuckerberg or any of the other billionaires who influence in a negative fashion. Here Maine Public had to say about him in a Sept. 2022 article:
According to newly filed campaign finance disclosures, Klingenstein gave $100,000 to the Maine Families First PAC, which is led by the national conservative group the American Principles Project.
APP has been running ads in multiple states, including Maine, accusing Democrats of indoctrinating school kids with LGBTQ books and instruction.
Klingenstein has also given nearly $2 million to federal candidates and PACs in the current election cycle.
That includes donations to former Republican U.S. Rep. Bruce Poliquin, who is challenging 2nd District Democratic U.S. Rep. Jared Golden and independent Tiffany Bond.
Klingenstein's heightened public profile has come with increased scrutiny for him and for the Claremont Institute.
He defended institute scholar and attorney John Eastman for advising former President Donald Trump during his attempts to overturn the 2020 election.
And last year he used a speech to defend Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism."
Sounds like a real bastard to me. /sarcasm
BTW, I don't think you have use for anyone, because you come off as a very bitter person who has nothing nice to say about anyone. You are incapable of finding any good in those trying to make a difference. You also do not appreciate anyone who tries to support this nation.
You're a sad little character in my eyes.
Agsin there’s a large segment of conservatives who don’t care what the election determined who the winner was. The rest mounting that mattered was Trump should have had his second term. Legally or not. I hear that often. I hear that in committee meetings. I hear that at candidate forums.
That's because that is what you want to see, because you suffer from TDS
Can you provide evidence of Trumps use of hydroxychoriquin. And that it worked.
3) I’ve considered it.
4) “How on Earth does Eastman get to this point of being ready to jettison the Constitution?” said one former fellow, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid alienating friends at the institute. “It’s by pushing deeper into this idea of natural rights, which justify any means necessary to preserve the republic. … That’s how Claremont goes from this quirky intellectual outfit to one of the main intellectual architects of trying to overthrow the republic.” That’s my concern about Eastman, Claremont and Klingenstein. Election results don’t matter. Even you noted Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism." I have no live or desire for communism. I have no desire for election results not to matter.
I would say the TDS lands squarely ion your shoulders and the shoulders of those who think like you.
Nope, just because you say it does, doesn't make it so. It boils down to incidence counts. They harped on it for more then 2 years, thousands of times by thousands of different individuals from every walks-of-life & professions proclaiming they were following the science, when in reality many do not even know science at all. Trump 1 time that you referenced.
Can you provide evidence of Trumps use of hydroxychoriquin And that it worked.
You are a lazy person, except when you want to find negative stuff on Trump.
Trump had no side effects after taking hydroxychloroquine, White House doctor says
3) I’ve considered it.
Well, either your "spell checker" auto-correct is as incompetent as you , or that is another lie you are employing as an excuse to cover up your sloppiness.
4) “How on Earth does Eastman get to this point of being ready to jettison the Constitution?” said one former fellow, speaking on the condition of anonymity to avoid alienating friends at the institute. “It’s by pushing deeper into this idea of natural rights, which justify any means necessary to preserve the republic. … That’s how Claremont goes from this quirky intellectual outfit to one of the main intellectual architects of trying to overthrow the republic.” That’s my concern about Eastman, Claremont and Klingenstein. Election results don’t matter.
Yeah, I always take claims from someone who remains anonymous, especially when they are Constitutionally wrong with regards to a man who is a known Constitutional scholar. Because you sorely lack critical thinking skills, but you do possess critical thinking, especially of those you hate.
May I remind you:
The people who cast the votes don't decide an election, the people who count the votes do. - Joseph Stalin" Since you do not believe the election was stolen, even though you have no proof whatsoever that it was a fair election, coupled with your obvious lack of critical think skills you probably son not understand what Stalin meant. furthermore, Biden emulates Stalin & Hitler far more than Trump does.
You are a pitiful excise for a human being
Even you noted Trump as a necessary strongman in the life and death struggle against what he called "woke communism."
I never said any such thing. Once again you lie. You just can't help yourself I guess when you know you are a loser & a simp.
I would say the TDS lands squarely ion your shoulders and the shoulders of those who think like you.
More evidence of your blatant ignorance. Go away Joe, you bore me to tears.
Because you are obtuse, stupid & a liar, I once again provide you with the opportunity to have the last word, This time I will hold fast to my promise to not respond, for it truly is a waste of my time. Because you aren't the least bit interested in the truth, or you lack the capacity to recognize the truth.
Either way, you are not worth it for me to keep trying with someone of your caliber.
Bye bye, little Joey. May you reap in life what you sow, in bountiful quantities.
Personally I think that nobody should be allowed to take the Oath of Office unless at least 95% of all assets over 1M are in a Treasury Direct account and that it must remain over 90% until they are 30+ days out of office.
You’ll be back.
See my tagline.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.