I don't think there is a statute of limitations on treason.
Does anyone really believe that Bush Junior would have done anything significantly different than Clinton in 1998?
Without a doubt.
...and in the wake of a massive attack on American soil, Clinton would be just as gung-ho as Bush is.
As for the most proximate possible cause of the tragedy, one that doesn't need in-depth research/delusional detective work, look no further than the laxity of airport security, reforms for which several large corporations opposed, supported by their Republican lackeys.
Talk about delusional. You're saying that intelligence information that operatives were here and had a plan to use airliners as bombs was meaningless and trivial and couldn't have been used to alter the events of 9/11.
And if you need reasons to be fearful for the future, there's always Bush's walk out on the biological weapons treaty negotiations, which might have limited the spread of these weapons.
Oh yeah, that's right. Saddam was chomping at the bit to sign on to those treaties. You're a complete ignoramus.
So when you take a long hard look at the multiple actors involved in allowing this to happen, it takes a very particular breed of brutal opportunist to use the tragedy to whip Clinton yet again.
He should be tried for treason, convicted, given the appropriate sentence and the sentence carried out. Same for his co-conspirators. His sympathizers should be ostracized and scorned for eternity and any trace of his existence wiped out.
*Thanx to Cloud William for text and audio