Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lockheed Martin's PAC-3 Missile Intercepts Advanced Cruise Missile Target
PRNewswire via Yahoo! Finance ^ | Friday October 19

Posted on 10/21/2001 3:40:35 PM PDT by michigander

Friday October 19, 6:07 pm Eastern Time

Press Release

SOURCE: Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control

Lockheed Martin's PAC-3 Missile Intercepts Advanced Cruise Missile Target

DALLAS, Oct. 19 /PRNewswire/ -- The Patriot Advanced Capability-3 (PAC-3) Missile program completed Developmental Testing today by intercepting and destroying an advanced cruise missile target at White Sands Missile Range, N.M. The target BQM-74 cruise missile was flying at a very low altitude in a cluttered background.

Patriot soldiers from the Second Battalion of the 43rd Air Defense Artillery Regiment, Ft. Bliss, Texas, participated in the launch operations once again.

The PAC-3 program now moves into the Operational Testing phase. The PAC-3 Missile is in low-rate production.

``The PAC-3 Missile has been tremendously successful during Developmental Testing,'' said Jim Berry, president of Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. ``We have proven conclusively through these tests that the PAC-3 Missile is fully capable of defeating the entire threat to the Patriot air defense system: tactical ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and aircraft. The PAC-3 Missile provides a new level of protection against these challenging targets.''

``The Army continues to be quite pleased with the performance of the PAC-3 Missile and the upgraded Patriot ground equipment,'' said Col. Tom Newberry, Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense project manager. ``Today's PAC-3 flight test success further demonstrates the effectiveness of this important theater air defense system, and underscores the confidence we have in its ability to defeat today's sophisticated threats.''

``The PAC-3 Missile is ready to protect; ready to defend,'' said Ed Squires, senior vice president - Air & Missile Defense for Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control. ``The employees of Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, its suppliers and subcontractors feel a great deal of pride in supporting the soldiers for today's successful flight test.''

``The PAC-3 Missile team, along with our suppliers and subcontractors, are to be praised for their commitment to the success of this interceptor, as well as their efforts to help reduce the per-unit cost of the missile for our customer,'' said Berry. ``For the projected U.S. Army production run on PAC-3, we've been able to achieve cost-savings that place the average unit price of the missile just above $2 million each. And when we add expected foreign PAC-3 Missile production, we're talking about a missile that will be well below the $2 million mark.''

Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control, Dallas, Texas, is the prime contractor responsible for the PAC-3 Missile segment upgrade to the Patriot air defense system, which consists of the PAC-3 Missile, the missile canisters, the Fire Solution Computer and the Enhanced Launcher Electronics System.

PAC-3 is one of the world's most sophisticated technologies. The PAC-3 Missile boasts 12 successes out of 13 missile flights over the past three years, with nine intercepts in 10 attempts, an overall 92 percent success rate for the flight test program. The PAC-3 Missile intercept successes:

In addition to the 12 successful PAC-3 Missile flight tests, the PAC-3's predecessor missile, the Extended-Range Interceptor, demonstrated three hits in a row during the demonstration/validation program in 1994. Two of those tests involved TBM targets and one involved an air-breathing target (simulating a cruise missile or aircraft).

The PAC-3 Missile is a high velocity, hit-to-kill missile and is the next generation Patriot missile being developed to provide increased capability against advanced theater ballistic missiles, cruise missiles and hostile aircraft. The PAC-3 Missile defeats incoming targets by direct, body-to-body impact. The PAC-3 Missiles, when deployed in a Patriot battery, will significantly increase the Patriot system's firepower, since 16 PAC-3 Missiles load-out on a Patriot launcher, compared with four of the old Patriot missiles.

Employing more than 8,500 people, Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control is headquartered in Dallas, Texas, with additional base operations in Orlando, Fla., and manufacturing and assembly facilities in Sunnyvale, Calif., Chelmsford, Mass., Camden, Ark., Horizon City and Lufkin, Texas, Ocala, Fla., White Sands Missile Range, N.M., and Troy, Ala. The company is a business unit of Lockheed Martin Systems Integration in Bethesda, Md.

Headquartered in Bethesda, Maryland, Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT - news) is a global enterprise principally engaged in the research, design, development, manufacture and integration of advanced-technology systems, products and services. The Corporation's core businesses are systems integration, space, aeronautics and technology services.


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

Patriot TMD


1 posted on 10/21/2001 3:40:36 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: michigander
bump
2 posted on 10/21/2001 3:42:49 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
The PAC-3 program now moves into the Operational Testing phase. The PAC-3 Missile is in low-rate production.

I suspect that the production on this one will be bumped up when we go after the next few names on our list, notably Iraq.

3 posted on 10/21/2001 3:55:03 PM PDT by denydenydeny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Heh. 2 million a copy. To take down something that costs ~600k(average cost of a Tomahawk). Not that I am complaining, luckily we have WAY more money then any bad guys that come to mind. Just interesting from a cost view(though the benefit is really high, as saving American soldiers is priceless).
4 posted on 10/21/2001 4:04:33 PM PDT by danielobvt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: michigander
TBM = theater ballistic missile, i.e., Scud, correct?
5 posted on 10/21/2001 4:14:07 PM PDT by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: danielobvt
Heh. 2 million a copy. To take down something that costs ~600k(average cost of a Tomahawk). Not that I am complaining, luckily we have WAY more money then any bad guys that come to mind. Just interesting from a cost view(though the benefit is really high, as saving American soldiers is priceless).

During my military career as an operations analyst I often ran into the issue of whether a weapon must be cheaper than the enemy target it destroys. I used to have a Russian military OR textbook (lost it when my house was flooded) that referred to this view as "the capitalist fallacy."

The point is simple. The relative cost of the weapon and the target is irrelevant. The proper comparison is between the cost of destroying the target and the cost of not destroying it, but allowing it to continue to operate against you. If it's doing you more harm than the cost of destroying it, you need to destroy it, even if that costs more than the target did. Example: using an artillery shell to kill a sniper in a tree. More expensive than the sniper's rifle, but cheaper than allowing him to continue shooting, and a lot cheaper than alternative methods of killing him.

6 posted on 10/21/2001 5:30:53 PM PDT by JoeFromSidney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: JoeFromSidney
No arguement here. Just though it was amusing. Considering there is no more reliable way that is cheaper and doesn't place anyone in more danger, I have no problems with using the most effective tool, no matter what the cost to protect/effectively carry out the mission. The number just tickled the fancy of the accountant in me, nothing more.
7 posted on 10/21/2001 7:12:24 PM PDT by danielobvt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Campion
Yes.
8 posted on 10/21/2001 7:13:18 PM PDT by michigander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: michigander
Is there a neighborhood watch model available? I'd like to place my order now.
9 posted on 10/21/2001 7:21:57 PM PDT by appeal2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson