Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

[Review of] The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring
Home Theater Forum ^ | 28 Nov 2001 | "Ron & Chris"

Posted on 11/27/2001 8:56:31 PM PST by sourcery

The Lord Of The Rings: The Fellowship Of The Ring





Cast (Major Roles Only)

Elijah Wood as Frodo Baggins
Sir Ian McKellen as Gandalf
Viggo Mortensen as Aragorn
Sir Ian Holm as Bilbo Baggins
Sean Astin as Sam Gamgee
Billy Boyd as Pippin Took
Dominic Monaghan as Merry Brandybuck
Orlando Bloom as Legolas
John Rhys-Davies as Gimli
John Rhys-Davies (voice) as Treebeard
Sean Bean as Boromir
Cate Blanchett as Galadriel
Liv Tyler as Arwen
Christopher Lee as Saruman
Brad Dourif as Grima Wormtongue
Andy Serkis (voice) as Smeagol (Gollum)

Director:

Peter Jackson



A review by Ronald Epstein

One ring to rule them all,
One ring to find them,
one ring to bring them all and in
the darkness bind them.

Published in 1954-1955, J.R.R. Tolkien's masterpiece Lord Of The Rings trilogy still remains one of the
most definitive works of imaginary fiction ever written. The extraordinary efforts to get this trilogy to
the screen is a testament of how popular these stories are today. New Line has taken a gamble and risked
everything by filming all three movies back-to-back without knowing the fate of the original release.
The Fellowship of the Ring is the very first of the Tolkien trilogy. It will be followed up with
The Two Towers (2002) and Return of the King (2003).

As release date slowly draws nearer, everyone is holding their breath. Will this film live up to expectations?
Will this movie make a strong enough impact that audiences will anxiously want to remain loyal to the
films that will follow? The answer is a definitive YES on all accounts.

Lord Of The Rings will make its mark in film history. Fans will embrace this film and newcomers will
be in complete awe of one of the most visually entertaining films ever made....and this is only the beginning!

The film begins with lengthy female narrative that tells the story of Middle Earth - the ancient land of elves,
dwarves, hobbits, wizards and other creatures. We are told of the creation of the individual rings that
were handed down to the wisest and most noblest creatures of Middle Earth. We are then told of the ONE
ring that was forged out of Mount Doom -- the ring that controlled all others -- worn by the dark and
evil Lord Sauren. We are told of a battle and the defeat of Sauren and how his ring is eventually lost
only to be found by Gollum, a lowly creature that gets poisoned by its power. The ring is eventually
stolen by hobbit named Bilbo Baggins. And so, this is where the trilogy begins.....

It's a beautiful day in the Shire, the peaceful home of the Hobbits. A carriage rolls through a lone road
that parts meadows of lush grass and farmland. It is Gandalf the Wizard visiting his old Hobbit friend,
Bilbo Baggins (Ian Holm). It is Bilbo's birthday, and the old hobbit is more concerned about leaving the
Shire rather than partake in any party. Something is very heavy on Bilbo's mind, and Gandalf is watching
him closely. That evening, Bilbo's party is in full swing with some of the most amazing and beautiful firework
displays ever seen on film. When Bilbo makes a daring announcement to his party guests, Gandalf realizes that
Bilbo is in possession of a very important ring. Gandalf convinces Bilbo to give up the ring, and give it to
the very young Frodo (Elijah Wood). When the secret of the ring is finally revealed to the old Wizard, Frodo
is warned to leave the Shire at once. Hence, the adventure of a lifetime begins.

Clocking in at about 3 hours running length, Lord Of The Rings doesn't waste time. Every minute of
the film is used to remain as faithful to the book as possible. The most important aspect of this film is
that it had to properly tell the story as written. The end result is that this film becomes a definitive
and accurate recreation of the story.

Though it had been 20 years since I last read the trilogy, the film brought back every single memory I had
of the story with visuals that exceeded my own imagination. You will see visuals in this film that go beyond
anything you have seen before. The film is visually beautiful as we travel through the lush green grasses
of the Shire with the huts built into the hills, or, the beautiful mountain village of Rivendell, inhabited
by the Elves. With so much beauty also comes the darkness of Mordor and Mount Doom so grimly recreated
with cameras that swoop into the lowest depths of these locations as we watch armies of death manufacturer
weapons as they grow, amass, and hunt the one that holds the ring.

Make no mistake about it, this film is very dark. The most terrifying creatures of Middle Earth are
realistically brought to life. Whether it be the Ringwraiths, dark riders who are neither dead or alive
or the armies of orcs who inhabit the Mountains of the Dwarf kingdom, this movie manages to keep your
heart racing with scene after scene of edge-of-the-seat battles set to sweeping music of Howard Shore.

I have two favorite sequences in this movie. One involves a duel between Gandalf (Ian Holm) and the
elder wizard, Saruman (Christopher Lee). With each Wizard testing their powers against each other,
the duel becomes one of the most memorable scenes of the film as we see Gandalf helplessly spinning
around the floor. Another favorite sequence involves Frodo putting the ring on his finger and not
only becoming invisible to the outside world, but being visible to the inner world of darkness. These
effect sequences are creatively reproduced on screen to the point where you get chills running down
your spine.

The biggest hurdles that New Line faces with Lord Of The Rings is the 3-hour running time and
the fact that this is not a film that is going to appeal to all audiences. While the fans who read
the original books are going to be enthralled with its faithfulness to the book, I couldn't help but
hear many women of the audience talking afterwards about how much they were unimpressed by the whole
film. Fans of the books and Fantasy films alike are in for the treat of their lives. Lord Of The Rings
has accomplished what many thought was the impossible -- to bring a live-action film to the screen
that accurately portrays the books as written, with enough visual eyes candy and engrossing battle scenes
that could very well make this the STAR WARS trilogy of the new century.

On a scale of 1-5, I give this film a 5.

Opens December 18th, 2001


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last
To: All
I have a question for everyone. Many people choose to boycott a product because they find some aspect of its production abhorrent. It could be Cuban cigars; it could be Nike shoes; it could be Wagnerian opera in Israel; it could be Israeli products in Dubai. One common reason for boycotting products is a disdain for someone involved in the production. However, it is often argued that these sorts of boycotts, especially of artistic productions, are invalid and that what should be judged is the art. That is the reason commonly given for attempts to stage Wagner in Israel. So my question is, is anyone planning to boycott LOTR given that Ian McKellen is a prominent gay activist?
41 posted on 11/28/2001 2:27:30 AM PST by slhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AuntToots
It does take a while to get going. It really isn't until the middle of "The Two Towers" that things start to heat up. And, I do agree that it appeals more to men as it is a "Good vs. evil/save the entire world" fantasy - something that is more of a male fantasy (call me sexist.... I think men and women think differently!)
42 posted on 11/28/2001 2:59:20 AM PST by KeepUSfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade
"One true love and a few true male friends...or they could end up like Hillary!!!!"

LOL...I wouldn't wish that horrid fate upon the WORST of my Enemies!!

FReegards...MUD

43 posted on 11/28/2001 3:33:15 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I remain sceptical about adaptations of novels like Lord of the Rings. I am a Dune maniac and still am waiting for the definitive film version. I hope they have success with Lord of the Rings; I am going to see it as soon as it comes out. If it works, what can I say, as a Dune fan I will be crouched in my seat, envying you LOTR fans and wondering when someone foolish enough to blow millions on Dune again will come.

Regards, Ivan

Dreamers of Dune
FreeBritannia.co.uk
44 posted on 11/28/2001 3:42:37 AM PST by MadIvan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
Thanks for those reviews. I'm taking some teenagers to see the movie when it comes out. I'm looking forward to it but if it really is like Braveheart or Gladiator, it will be a long three hours for me.
45 posted on 11/28/2001 3:49:40 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
Thanks for the post. I've started reading "Fellowship" again, and having last read the Trilogy 15 years ago, or so, I don't want to see the movie until I have rekindled my own personal perceptions. While I am looking forward to seeing it, no movie could ever do justice to the Trilogy.

All that is gold does not glitter, Not all those who wander are lost; The old that is strong does not wither, Deep roots are not reached by the frost. From the ashes a fire shall be woken, Alight from the shadows shall spring; Renewed shall be blade that was broken: The crownless again shall be king.
-- JRR Tolkien

46 posted on 11/28/2001 4:28:36 AM PST by Eowyn-of-Rohan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AuntToots
What you need to do is this: Set aside 3 or 4 days, preferably rainy, cold and gloomy ones. Build a fire in your fireplace (if you have one). Put on some classical music and snuggle up with blanket on your couch. Start reading. Read until you finish all 3 books. You will like it.
47 posted on 11/28/2001 4:44:12 AM PST by Eowyn-of-Rohan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: marajade
.... and don't know women at all. Guilty as charged. Now, if most women would only admit the opposite to be true, then the divorce rate would be lower and feminism would not have taken its modern, unisex turn.
48 posted on 11/28/2001 5:22:10 AM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: LoneGreenEyeshade; Mudboy Slim
While the fans who read the original books are going to be enthralled with its faithfulness to the book,

I SO hope so.

I understand that the real changes from the books include the elimination of Tom Bombadil (don't know if the Old Forest will figure in, probably at some level to later explain the Ents), and Arwen has a bigger role than in the books (takes Glorfindel's place at the Ford -- and her line there really bothers me for some reason). I'm not sure what other changes there will be, but I understand that these are the main ones.

49 posted on 11/28/2001 5:28:10 AM PST by Darth Reagan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: AuntToots
Frodo has already reached Rivendale

Did he visit the Hebrew Home? Oops, that's Riverdale...

51 posted on 11/28/2001 5:31:14 AM PST by Silly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Samwise
Thanks for the ping. I am more than interested.
52 posted on 11/28/2001 5:33:48 AM PST by FairWitness
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sourcery
I can hardly wait. I'm curious as to why they didn't do The Hobbit first.

Liv Tyler mmmmm..

53 posted on 11/28/2001 5:40:34 AM PST by csvset
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
(takes Glorfindel's place at the Ford -- and her line there really bothers me for some reason)

It bothers you because they're messing with a classic. It would be like someone touching up the smile on the Mona Lisa. Da Vinci didn't quite get it right. We'll fix it.

54 posted on 11/28/2001 5:48:49 AM PST by Samwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Darth Reagan
"Arwen has a bigger role than in the books (takes Glorfindel's place at the Ford -- and her line there really bothers me for some reason)."

Any change from Tolkien's original classic is gonna bother me, but I can almost understand the Arwen move, as a Screenwriter may have seen the need to build up the character of Lady Arwen to make her a worthy mate for Aragorn...plus it gives us more opportunities to gaze upon the fair maiden, Liv Tyler!!

I can't remember the last time I was this psyched about a movie coming out...hopefully, it won't be too long before the video becomes available, too, seeing how "The Two Towers" and "The Return of the King" are coming out in '02 and '03!!

Wonder if someone will attempt to tackle "The Silmarillion" next?!

FReegards...MUD

55 posted on 11/28/2001 5:51:28 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: csvset
The didn't have the rights to the Hobbit, just The Lord of the Rings. Although, I don't think it would be hard for New Line to get the rights now.
56 posted on 11/28/2001 5:52:50 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: cdwright
"Are these novels "Christian?"

Nope...but they are "spiritual" and delve into the age-old question of Good vs. Evil and Right vs. Left/Wrong.

FReegards...MUD

57 posted on 11/28/2001 5:54:04 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Mudboy Slim
The Silmarillion would be quite an undertaking!
58 posted on 11/28/2001 5:55:05 AM PST by Anitius Severinus Boethius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius; Dukie; Jeff Head
Yep...probably another trilogy AT LEAST, but where would you end each movie?

FReegards...MUD

BTW...while I've come to see Bill Clinton as America's Sauron, I believe Morgoth represents the whole concept of Socialism/Lib'ralism/Collectivism/Fascism/Progressivism/Totalitarianism!!

59 posted on 11/28/2001 6:04:43 AM PST by Mudboy Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cdwright
They were written by one and have some strong Christian overtures, but I have no doubt at all that if it were not known that Tolkien was a Christian... the rage against LOTR would be just as strong as the criticism of Harry Potter in this forum.
60 posted on 11/28/2001 6:11:02 AM PST by Nataku X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-208 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson