You suppose right.
The Compassionate Investigational New Drug (IND) Program no longer exists, BTW.
Which is relevant how?
I wasn't expecting you to have the staying power to remain on a point raised for more than two posts, so I am not surprised at this non-response, but pedagog that I am, I'll try to rub your nose in it--we were offered that piece-of-tripe treaty-derived law as the CONSITITUTIONAL justification for the war on drugs. As if that somehow trumps the Founding Clause, and the 9th, 10th, 14th, 18th and 21st Amendments.
If it does, than it is a profound piece of legislation indeed, and it ought to puzzle us greatly that the DEA chose to ignore its direction with respect to Young's Marijuana Rescheduling findings. They stood, in fact, in simple violation of this law we are being touting between 1988 and 1992--now higher courts have granted the DEA relief with "temporary" stay of the findings, based on an incredibly obscure technicality.