BUCHANAN DECLARES: DEATH OF THE WEST

Drudge Report ^ | 01/02/2002 | Matt Drudge

[IM2Phat4U]

The Amazon.com 100

Updated Hourly!

1. Bias
by Bernard Goldberg

2. Body Rx
by A. Scott Connelly

3. The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings (Boxed Set)
by J. R. R. Tolkien

4. The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings Boxed Set
by J. R. R. Tolkien

5. The Death of the West by Patrick J. Buchanan

[PuNcH]

Bill Reilly, on national television, has repeatedly presented overwhelming evidence that Black males commit murder, rape, and other violent crimes at an astoundingly higher rate (somewhere on the order of tenfold) than white males. Result? Reilly presents the facts (backed up by FBI statistics), and Reilly is vilified.

Gee something like this wouldnt get deleted on FR.

[eskimo]

It's still undisputed, and highly relevant.

I agree. Even the carpetbagger’s apologists do not openly present their disagreement.

It's amazing to me how people of the left and the right can ignore historical events while hammering an ideology home.

If greed, power and profit drive your ideology, truth and historical fact are your fiercest enemies. We must never forgo an opportunity to clarify that point.

[PuNcH]

but take a close look at what he's saying - that non-whites for some fundamental reason can't participate in the social and economic life of American. That non-whites are a threat to the religious foundations of America. That non-whites are inherently incapable of being successful. I haven't heard him mention interracial marriage but I expect it soon.

But you arent taking a close look at what he is saying. You are putting your interpretations in Buchanan's mouth and calling him a racist. Big whoop. If you think you are responding to something Buchanan specifically stated (a close look) you would be wrong.

[garbanzo]

Ok tell me where Buchanan's current rhetoric differs from KKK/white separatist/white supremacist rhetoric? I've provided a number of cases where Pat takes the KKK position. In my view, the only reason he doesn't openly side with them is one of class rather than ideological difference.

Pat is smart enough not to actually say n----r and s--c, but it's crystal clear that's the intent.

[Ridin' Shotgun]

LOL! The hysterical garbanzo bean should be outstanding in his field with a multitude of diversified veggies.

[Libertina]

Yep... RINOrats=liberals

[Blade]

Pat doesn't use the crude language of the KKK - but the ideas are all-but-identical.

The complete dishonesty of you and your ilk is amazing.

Can't dispute the facts Pat puts forth, so why not play the race card? Great Bolshevik tactic.

[garbanzo]

Disputed by him - read the article - he wrote an entire book on it! These aren't interpretations - it's just embarrassing for the invisible empire to become visible.

[Texas Gal]

Could you please quote an example of a racist rant by Mr. Buchanan?      I already posted what I considered to be racist rants... go find it..Freepers should be able to read.      (Thank you very much, obviously Freepers can read...but I am not the one charging him with a racist rant, you are...so the burden of proof, or at the very least, any sort of evidence at all, is yours.)       Basically, I believe they are rants (again, kindly supply the quotes.  If you posted them once before, how hard is it to post them again, to back up your charge?)     ...because the majority will not listen to him (the refusal or failure of the majority to listen to any certain person is indicative of nothing in particular...nor is it any indicator of either the rightness or wrongness of the ideas that person expresses.)     and I believe they     ("they" being who?)     are racists because he highlights racial distinctions and racial issues    (please supply a quote to illustrate this...and no, it's not my burden to go look it up, it's your burden to back up your own point)    It would be great if he could present his facts and stats in a way that would muster all Americans together (not even the murder of over 3,000 Americans on 9/11 did that, but one man can?  You expect too much of one man, and label him a racist in the process.), which then would FORCE our politicians to make changes.  (You agree with him then? If you sought to confuse me, you have success.)

[garbanzo]

Ok tell me why Pat felt it important to write a book about "Third World" immigration? As opposed to immigration from white Europeans or Canadians? Why is that Pat finds it alarming that America may not be a majority white country in the future? Why does Pat associate the religion of Christianity with Europe when Christianity is practiced worldwide? Why does Pat not like Catholic and Evangelical immigration from Asian countries that persecute Christians?

[Ridin' Shotgun]

I call them traitors. They swear to uphold the Constitution and they KNOW that oath is compromised before their names even appear on a primary ballot. That way, no matter which side wins, the new world order gang wins. But truthfully, even traitors are not so much to be feared as the fools who'd believe the lies and actually vote for any of them.

[Poohbah]

I take it you don't know the answer to the questions I asked and you assume the founder of Operation Blockade and the people who voted for him is a white racist. You make the racist assumption that everyone who opposes skyrocket high illegal immigration is white. I voted for Keyes by the way ---since I wanted a black president and you didn't you must be a racist.

I asked a couple of posters if there were more racialist posters on FR of late. You were not addressed on the post, but you responded with an irrelevant question. Generally, such actions are undertaken by those who, in some way, feel like THEIR attitudes and beliefs are under attack. It's called "guilty conscience."

Go back and read the posts on this thread--and if you can say with a straight face that absolutely no racialists post on FR, then your problem is that you are one of them.

[ex-snook]

"Buchanan from saying that America was going to the proverbial place of eternal theological damnation in the proverbial handbasket because it was letting in too many people of the "wrong" ethnicity. "

Sounds like Sharon, don't you think?

[PuNcH]

Ok tell me where Buchanan's current rhetoric differs from KKK/white separatist/white supremacist rhetoric?

In other words you want someone to prove that Buchanan ISNT a racist? OR you could go take a logic101 class. How about that?