Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Towards a Lasting Middle East Peace
12/11/2001 | By: Rabbi Yisroel D. Weiss of Neturei Karta International

Posted on 01/20/2002 8:45:33 AM PST by Demidog

At the National Press Club, Washington DC , 11 December 2001

With G-D’s help May the Creator grant that my words find favor in His eyes.

Each day’s news brings with it horrible tales of suffering from the Holy Land . The death toll on both sides mounts steadily. Indeed, so overwhelming is the seemingly never-ending stream of death and mayhem that it requires an exceptionally bloody day to merit significant media consideration. We have all grown accustomed to the fact that the Israeli state and its Palestinian opponents are locked in mortal combat. So it has been, so it is and so, it seems, it always will be.

Indeed, this pessimistic prognosis seems rooted in a century of precedent. The first Jewish settlers who came to Palestine with the intention of establishing a sovereign Jewish state there arrived towards the end of the nineteenth century. Palestinian nationalism – then generally subsumed under the title Arab nationalism but soon to assume its more particularistic title – began to flourish at about the same time.

The clash of these movements was played out through various wars, atrocities, revolutions and dispossessions throughout the twentieth century. Various strains of ideology in these rival nationalisms have attempted to bring the matter to closure, either by force of arms or, at times, by recourse to the negotiating table.

All these efforts, be they military or compromise oriented, have one fact in common. Their result is always the same. They have failed – failed utterly and totally. We may delude ourselves by yet dreaming, as many do, that there is one final war or one last peace plan which can calm all those concerned. Unfortunately there is no indication that such is the case.

We of Neturei Karta International find the toll of dead and wounded on both sides to be intolerable. We feel that it is high time for a radical departure from the assumptions that have governed and, effectively stifled free debate on the subject.

Our perspective is far from new. It is the centuries old view of the Torah. It was once universally shared by all Jews and it is only our people’s recent flirtation with assorted secularist dogmas that have caused it to be forgotten of late in some quarters.

Simply stated – The essence of Judaism is our faith -- our belief that G-d spoke to Moses and the assembled multitudes at Sinai and there gave His Revelation to the world. This was, is and always will be, Judaism.

The Jewish exile from the Holy Land , which followed the Roman destruction of the Second Temple close to two thousand years ago, was always viewed by our people as a Divine punishment. The state of exile in which we found ourselves was not seen as the result of military or political weakness. Rather, the Creator had decreed that until such time as He would chose to redeem the world, world Jewry was to remain in exile. The only possible means to alter what was and is a metaphysical state are spiritual. Repentance, prayer, Torah study, deeds of kindness and the like could hasten redemption. Nothing else would be effective. Any other means of ending exile is metaphysically doomed to failure.

Zionism was a movement dedicated to altering this traditional view of redemption. It posited that political maneuvering; revolutionary terror, war and dispossession would yield Jewish salvation.

Nothing could be further from the truths of Judaism.

However, Zionism not only broke with the teachings of our faith, it also entered upon a campaign, now over one hundred years old, to persuade and, eventually, force, when possible, Jews to abandon their allegiance to G-d and the Torah and recreate themselves as secular nationalists.

The Zionist movement was not only a heretical departure from Judaism and a practical attempt to lure Jews from their Torah. It was also monstrously blind to the indigenous inhabitants of the Holy Land . In the 1890s, less than 5% of the Holy Land ’s population was Jewish, yet, Theodore Herzl had the nerve to describe his movement as that of “a people without a land for a land without a people.”

Time and again both Revisionist and Labor Zionists, the former overtly and the latter under the clouds of deceptive rhetoric, have sought the elimination of the Palestinian people from their state. They have dispossessed thousands and refused them the right of return or minimum compensation. They have kept the people of Gaza and the West Bank stripped of basic political and human rights and denied them the dignity of self-determination.

This aggression has plunged the region into its never-ending spiral of bloodshed.

Sad to say, the bloody results of Zionism were not unexpected. They were foretold in the Talmud. There we read that a human based attempt to return en masse to the Holy Land would result in terrifying loss of life. This is an unpleasant truth but its seems quite validated by the past century’s events.

People of the Press, I have come before you today to offer a new perspective on the Middle East, a new explanation as to why all previous attempts at peace making have failed. It is our belief that they are inherently doomed to fail. All of them share one fatal assumption. They find it axiomatic that the state of Israel should exist. And, in contrast to the plain evidence of the past half-century of Jewish history they see its existence as a positive development for the Jewish people.

Only blind dogma could at this date see Israel as something good for the Jewish people. Established as a so-called safe haven it has consistently over the past five decades been the most dangerous place on the face of the earth for a Jew to live. It has been the source of tens of thousands of Jewish deaths, of families torn apart and has left a trail of grieving widows, orphans and friends in its wake.

Not to mention the countless thousands of Jewish souls diverted from religion. And our Rabbis state “If you cause one to sin, it is worse than killing him”.

And, let us not forget that this tale of physical Jewish suffering is far magnified among the Palestinian people, a nation condemned to poverty, persecution, homelessness, all pervasive hopelessness and all too often, a far too premature, death.

This web of pain, the cries and tears of the grieving, demand of us as Jews that we return to the wellsprings of our faith. We must accept our task to serve G-d in humility and peace. This is the essence of a Jew.

And, when so doing we will inevitably reject the bizarre and malicious doctrines of Zionism, the falsification of Judaism.

We will realize that defying the Divine decree of exile is doomed to bloody failure.

We will realize that our people’s hopes cannot be built by shattering those of another people.

We will demand and with G-d’s, help live to see the peaceful dismantling of the state. We will return the land to those who dwelt upon it for centuries, the Palestinian people. Under their sovereignty, we will work towards a just solution to any Jewish – Palestinian problems created by the brief period of Zionist ascendancy.

There are I’m sure some skeptics here in the audience who feel that a Palestinian state would represent a threat to the Jewish people. My friends, I have been there time and time again as Neturei Karta International has visited Palestinian and Islamic organizations and I have been greeted with extraordinary warmth and brotherly concern. We have visited Iran , been hosts of the government. We were allowed to speak in Iran to both Jewish and non-Jewish audiences, without any prior censorship. We have discovered time after time, that Muslims in general actually yearn for good relations with Jews and, that when the evil face of Zionism is stripped away, the naturally good relations between our peoples bubbles to the surface.

Actully history bears witness that through out the centuries Muslim countries were extremely hospitable to the Jews. In fact as a general rule the Jews faired far better in those countries than in other host lands.

And in Palestine alone our grandparent have testified to the fact that the Muslims and Jews lived in peace and harmony up until the advent of Zionism.

Many stories of the close friendship that existed at that time circulate in the Jewish communities, for instance, baby sitting each others children was a daily occurrence

We also operate a web site. There isn’t a day goes by when we don’t receive e- mails from around the Islamic world. They are all positive. They bless, express love and brotherhood. Often they credit us with having cured them of anti Jewish sentiments. From Yemen to Great Britain the delight these people experience in finding anti Zionist Jews is palpable.

This then is the image we offer as an alternative to the current horror – of a Jewish people free of the need to kill and be killed, free to pursue their Divine task of Torah practice and free to live in peace and respect with all men. May the Creator grant that we all be worthy of seeing that day. And ultimately the day when all will recognize the one G-D and serve Him in harmony. AMEN


TOPICS: Editorial; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-326 next last
To: monkeyshine
His effort should be aimed at hastening the Messianic era, which can be attained only (from his perspective) by doing his utmost to bring the Jews back to God.

Again...that seems to be the sole purpose of his quest. And he claims that Zionism practiced precludes the Messianic era from returning.

101 posted on 01/20/2002 11:55:49 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul;Demidog
Under their sovereignty, we will work towards a just solution to any Jewish - Palestinian problems created by the brief period of Zionist ascendancy.

The Neturei Karta holds, among other things, that the holocoust was visited upon the Jews by Hitler because they were too "disobedient", and didn't "know their place". Posting from Neturei Karta is no different than posting from any other holocoust-denial/revisionist/Aryan/stormfront/whatever outlet.

Odie-dog is showing his spots.

102 posted on 01/20/2002 11:56:12 AM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Hey...I just want to say that no matter how we disagree on stuff I am always happy to have discussions with you due to your inherant politeness and resonable discourse. Thank you kindly.
103 posted on 01/20/2002 11:57:26 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
The Neturei Karta holds, among other things, that the holocoust was visited upon the Jews by Hitler because they were too "disobedient", and didn't "know their place".

Really? Where?

104 posted on 01/20/2002 11:58:14 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
But I believe he is saying just that. That what must come first is a return to God and then the rest will come as promised

How can you possibly know whether he is substantiated or not? You just had two Jewish posters state he is not. These are conservative Jewish posters and freepers. I wonder why you would, notwithstanding that, continue to believe this character who I have already noted has either lied about Arab-Jewish history or he has buried his head in the sand. He's not much of a reliable source for anything based on a major historical faux-pas.

105 posted on 01/20/2002 11:58:35 AM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
That what must come first is a return to God and then the rest will come as promised.

Again, this is a deeply philosphical argument based enitrely on Jewish thought. I am extremely curious to know what his Torah and Talmudic sources are to say that one must precede the other. He says in the speech that the Talmud says death will occur if one occurs before the other, and that that is a sin. Nevertheless, that does not mean that it will preclude the promise!

I will have to check out his website and see what are his Halachic sources to insist that the sequence of events must occur as he says.

106 posted on 01/20/2002 11:59:55 AM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Lent
You just had two Jewish posters state he is not.

I wish you would just keep to the arguments you and I are having until you can properly understand what is being said between us.

107 posted on 01/20/2002 12:00:54 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Really? Where?

Lol. Go educate yourself, Odie. No excuses. Come back when you know more than an average vegetable. Until then, you're on my twit-list ;).

108 posted on 01/20/2002 12:02:07 PM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: College Repub
Sheesh, school boy. I wasn't suspended, just taking a little break from rampant bigotry and the 'organized palestinian death wish' cheerleaders, (by my own choice).

PS. I would prefer not TO be suspended at all, now OR in the future, but if limititations to speaking only the beliefs of others become a part of this forum, I would go away of my own volition.

If you (or anyone else) is/are so threatened by opposing opinions to the degree that dissenting voices would be stilled in this venue ... well then, surely there are others.

For myself, I grieve that the deaths of innocent children will continue because God has been removed from the hearts of the men who rule the world and their mindless followers.

109 posted on 01/20/2002 12:02:37 PM PST by Ridin' Shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Nevertheless, that does not mean that it will preclude the promise!

OK. That is a point well taken.

110 posted on 01/20/2002 12:02:40 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
"Odie-dog is showing his spots." -- Cachelot

Wasting keystrokes towards flaming folks takes away points. Why not offer some intelligent discussion?

111 posted on 01/20/2002 12:02:53 PM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
You made the assertion and then fail to provide sources for that assertion. Sorry "Odie" it don't work that way.
112 posted on 01/20/2002 12:04:05 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
that seems to be the sole purpose of his quest. And he claims that Zionism practiced precludes the Messianic era from returning.

Are you absolutely sure that is what he is saying? I only read the speech once, I will have to read it again to find it... If you can snip out the quote(s) that say that I'd be much obliged.

PS you're welcome and thank you.

113 posted on 01/20/2002 12:04:55 PM PST by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: l33t
"In a press conference in Chicago Monday, Rabbi David Weiss, of the Neturei Karta group, praised Farrakhan as a man dedicated to "the bettering of mankind" and said that until the Zionist movement, Jews had always lived in peace with their neighbors."

"Rabbi" Weiss is obviously about as ignorant of history as it is possible to be. Doesn't sound like he's very familiar with the Torah, either. Demidog had to dredge pretty deep to come up with this "specimen of learning."

114 posted on 01/20/2002 12:05:01 PM PST by cookcounty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I wish you would just keep to the arguments you and I are having until you can properly understand what is being said between us.

I very much know what you're stating. And unless you can come up with more than vacuous comments your posting has the weight of a lot of hot air. And by the way, if you want to restrict comments on this thread then state in your post that you only want that poster to post to you otherwise your posting occurs on an open forum for all the public to see and comment on as I will continue to do so.

115 posted on 01/20/2002 12:08:06 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
However, Zionism not only broke with the teachings of our faith, it also entered upon a campaign, now over one hundred years old, to persuade and, eventually, force, when possible, Jews to abandon their allegiance to G-d and the Torah and recreate themselves as secular nationalists

This is what I was talking about here. I think what he is saying is that Zionism is in and of itself a violation of the Torah and a rejection of G-d.

116 posted on 01/20/2002 12:10:00 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You made the assertion and then fail to provide sources for that assertion

Lol. I'll give you one more before dropping you. I gave you sources. The Neturei Karta. Go educate yourself on that movement. It's not difficult, if you have an iq over 90. In fact, you can do it straight off the net. No excuses, Odie ;)).

Now go do something with your head.

117 posted on 01/20/2002 12:10:21 PM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Lent
I think you misunderstand. You have not properly characterized the disagreements (or even if there are any at all) between myself and other posters. Until you do understand what points we are disagreeing upon, you should stay out of it and stick to the converstaions you and I are having.
118 posted on 01/20/2002 12:11:30 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
You can't do it then?
119 posted on 01/20/2002 12:12:22 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Buckeroo
Wasting keystrokes towards flaming folks takes away points.

I have to have some taken away, you know. Or it would be too unfair.

120 posted on 01/20/2002 12:12:54 PM PST by Cachelot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Until you do understand what points we are disagreeing upon, you should stay out of it and stick to the converstaions you and I are having.

I understood the point. What is it you don't understand about that except you don't like the answer.

121 posted on 01/20/2002 12:13:23 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: cookcounty; Demidog
.... and said that until the Zionist movement, Jews had always lived in peace with their neighbors."

"Rabbi" Weiss is obviously about as ignorant of history as it is possible to be

What? Are you trying to insinuate that the Jews have never lived in peace with their neighbors?

122 posted on 01/20/2002 12:13:23 PM PST by Ridin' Shotgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: Lent
I understood the point.

No you didn't. There was no disagreement whatsoever over what the Torah said. That is why I wish you'd stick to our disagreements and stay out of the others.

123 posted on 01/20/2002 12:16:05 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
This is what I was talking about here. I think what he is saying is that Zionism is in and of itself a violation of the Torah and a rejection of G-d.

And he also said the Jews and Arabs have always lived in peace. Now I ask you again, notwithstanding that he has patently lied about this, or that he is woefully ignorant and the fact two Jewish posters have already stated to you his Torah version is not correct, why do you insist on parroting his nonsense?

124 posted on 01/20/2002 12:16:21 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Cachelot
But don't portray yourself as a loser. I love you way too much.
125 posted on 01/20/2002 12:17:42 PM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
There was no disagreement whatsoever over what the Torah said.

I think what he is saying is that Zionism is in and of itself a violation of the Torah and a rejection of G-d.

Can you actually post two more contradictory statements than you just have in the above?

126 posted on 01/20/2002 12:17:56 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Those statments are not mutually exclusive and I think if you would emply some intellectual honesty you'd realize that.
127 posted on 01/20/2002 12:22:19 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You don't even know what you post LOL.

What next? Norman Finkelstein? David Irving? More from this fringe-character 'Rabbi'? Nutcakes all.

128 posted on 01/20/2002 12:22:20 PM PST by veronica
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
To: OrthodoxPresbyterian FYI 58 posted on 1/20/02 12:00 PM Pacific by Demidog

Yeah, I'm familiar with the Orthodox Judaic argument against the theological validity of Zionism.

I try to avoid commenting on it for two reasons:
1.) Other Orthodox Jews say Zionism is as kosher as motzah. So it's an intramural spat in an area where my expertise is limited.
2.) My inclination would be to say, "The rabbi is right, Zionism is theologically invalid... you should all become Christians!!" But that would probably sound self-serving coming from a Christian and all...

...Mainly, the anti-Zionist theological argument, like the pro-Zionist theological argument, I do not consider particularly relevant to the legal validity of Israeli claims to the West Bank (aka Judea and Samaria). Those matters have more to do with post 1897-developments onward, than with Torah and Talmud. (I.E., even if Zionism is a theologically invalid form of Judaism, Zionist Israel has proper legal right to exist and proper legal claim to its current territories).

None of this would invalidate the human right of Palestinians in Ramallah (or for that matter, Jews in Haifa) to establish a new State, per the universal Human Rights detailed in the Declaration of Independence. Trouble is, for such Revolution to be just, the Revolutionists muct be both revolting against oppression, and proposing a government which respected those Rights detailed in the Declaration of Independence. The current intifada just isn't fitting that bill.

129 posted on 01/20/2002 12:22:48 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Lent
And he also said the Jews and Arabs have always lived in peace.

He did? Where did he say always?

130 posted on 01/20/2002 12:23:07 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: OrthodoxPresbyterian
2.) My inclination would be to say, "The rabbi is right, Zionism is theologically invalid... you should all become Christians!!" But that would probably sound self-serving coming from a Christian and all...

LOL. OK. But I hope you understand that I am not questioning the legal right of Israel to exist.

131 posted on 01/20/2002 12:25:07 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Do you agree with his version of the Torah understanding notwithstanding what I indicated in the above?
132 posted on 01/20/2002 12:25:14 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Good hemp. Give them enough and they hang themselves, or in the case of bucky-doo, shoots himself in the hoof.
133 posted on 01/20/2002 12:27:38 PM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: veronica
I know what I posted. What indication do you have that I do not? What is the basis for your assertion?
134 posted on 01/20/2002 12:27:46 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
He did? Where did he say always?

And in Palestine alone our grandparent have testified to the fact that the Muslims and Jews lived in peace and harmony up until the advent of Zionism.

If this is not ALWAYS then you better take some comprehension lessons. That is, Jews and Arabs lived in peace UP until ZIONISM. Therefore, Zionism is to blame. Hooey.

135 posted on 01/20/2002 12:29:15 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Do you agree with his version of the Torah understanding

Which "his version" are you talking about? I have stated already that I am not a scholar of the Torah. So I have pretty much refrained from making any statements about it. The disagreements that I have had on this thread so far are WHAT he has claimed as opposed to whether it is true or not.

Monkeyshine and I, if there were any real disagreements, have been discussing the substance of his statements rather than what the Torah actually says. That is where you came into error.

136 posted on 01/20/2002 12:31:19 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: veronica
One area of learning that I have found about you, veronica, is that you post some of the most prolific attacks upon some folks looking for an honest opinion. I guess your attacks are honest, within your own mind. But can we learn from you?
137 posted on 01/20/2002 12:33:10 PM PST by Buckeroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Lent
Before about 600 or so there were no muslims. So that alone has to limit the "always" to a certain period of time. That would be the time from the inception of Islam until 1896.
138 posted on 01/20/2002 12:34:30 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Which "his version" are you talking about? I have stated already that I am not a scholar of the Torah

If you advance a position and then purport to justify it then put up or shut up.

Monkeyshine and I, if there were any real disagreements, have been discussing the substance of his statements rather than what the Torah actually says

And yet you continued to parrot his version as if you didn't believe a word monkeyshine or the Jewish posters asserted. Is this your version of the "catch me if you can" argument?

139 posted on 01/20/2002 12:34:34 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: Lent
If you advance a position

What position have I advanced? Do you even know?

140 posted on 01/20/2002 12:36:04 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: rebdov
I feel like they are our Taliban and Al-Qeda.

I was going to say that but you beat me to it. BTTT.

141 posted on 01/20/2002 12:37:31 PM PST by Alouette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
LOL. OK. But I hope you understand that I am not questioning the legal right of Israel to exist. 131 posted on 1/20/02 1:25 PM Pacific by Demidog

Nah. You're posting an analysis of that theological opposition to Zionism which is held in good faith by a number of devout Orthodox Jews (mindful that many other Orthodox Jews are staunch adherents of the theological validity of Zionism), and submitting it to the consideration of FR's interested parties for comment.

Nothing wrong with that. We debate theology on this Forum quite a lot, after all.

142 posted on 01/20/2002 12:37:59 PM PST by OrthodoxPresbyterian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Lent
And yet you continued to parrot his version as if you didn't believe a word monkeyshine or the Jewish posters asserted.

I haven't parroted anyone's version at all. In fact if you had any intellectual honesty you would have also noticed when I conceded a point to Monkeshine. But it appears as if you are more interested in creating disagreements where none exist.

143 posted on 01/20/2002 12:38:17 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Before about 600 or so there were no muslims. So that alone has to limit the "always" to a certain period of time. That would be the time from the inception of Islam until 1896.

That's propbably the worst defence I've seen of anybody in my life. You obviously know exactly what I mean't when he unequivocally stated there was nothing but harmony between Jews and Islam (which in the context of Israel means the ARAB ISLAMICS) UNTIL zionism came along. Now, do you consider him on this point to either be stupid, or dishonest?

144 posted on 01/20/2002 12:39:08 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
I haven't parroted anyone's version at all. In fact if you had any intellectual honesty you would have also noticed when I conceded a point to Monkeshine. But it appears as if you are more interested in creating disagreements where none exist

You haven't impugned his interpretation of the Torah at all. If you did you wouldn't still be here posting because on his interpretation does the rest of his ideology rest. If you are prepared to cede his interpretation of zionism is false then say so outright now.

145 posted on 01/20/2002 12:41:50 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Lent
You obviously know exactly what I mean't when he unequivocally stated there was nothing but harmony between Jews and Islam

So at what point did Islam and Jews become out of harmony in the region? If you are going to assert that Islamics and Jews were at each others throats prior to the Zionists arriving in Palestine, then what are you talking about?

146 posted on 01/20/2002 12:51:11 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
There has been no real peace between Muslims and Jews since the advent/invent of Muhammed. This *Rabbi* is not simply a liar, he sounds like one of Arafat's Imams. He has profaned the Torah. He has profaned and slandered MOST of Judaism, and when the Muslims are through with him, they will kill him just for BEING a Jew, no matter how many points he gets for them. He is as trustworthy on this subject as Bill Clinton while giving a treatise on what is is.
147 posted on 01/20/2002 12:52:40 PM PST by Nix 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
So at what point did Islam and Jews become out of harmony in the region? If you are going to assert that Islamics and Jews were at each others throats prior to the Zionists arriving in Palestine, then what are you talking about?

Come out of harmony? Didn't you read the lengthy post I made giving an overview of that "relationship" over 12 centuries or so? Or is this another thing you conveniently missed?

148 posted on 01/20/2002 12:53:27 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: Lent
You haven't impugned his interpretation of the Torah at all.

You are really sloppy with your statements. It's hard for me to follow. "His interpretation" is overly broad. I haven't impugned anyones interpretion. I have disagreed with one person regarding Judaic law who claimed that Jews are forbidden from prosyletization.

149 posted on 01/20/2002 12:53:47 PM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
You are really sloppy with your statements. It's hard for me to follow. "His interpretation" is overly broad. I haven't impugned anyones interpretion

You were discussing zionism with monkeyshine. Do you agree that the Torah does not exclude Israel being constituted as a precursor to the Messiah coming? Yes or no.

150 posted on 01/20/2002 12:58:23 PM PST by Lent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 301-326 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson