Read The Book!
Posted on 02/04/2002 9:52:14 PM PST by ouroboros
Do you even know the meaning of the word ? Do YOU even have the faintest idea, who this author is , and his background ?
Aquatic wrote:Read the book, then make judgements.It baffles me as to why any fan of Pat needs to shell out one red penny to read what Pat has to say in his latest book. Just pay a free visit to the websites of such well-respected think-tanks as National Alliance and Ku Klux Klan, who for years have been sounding the alarm against “non-white” invasion and impending demise of “white” race, the very same theme that got Pat's juices flowing.
Anyone who supports Buchanan’s position on race and immigration must have the intellectual fortitude to declare that National Alliance and Skinheads are visionaries who have been viciously maligned by the liberal press.
Posters like this understand full well the tactics of a peaceful revolution, i.e., attack your opponents character so he must defend that instead of his argument...then repeat the accusation, i.e., "He's a racist, he's a bigot, he's a facist" until it becomes a "fact" in the minds of the public.
READ THIS BOOK!
(And damn the trolls...)
The speech that Republicans are just NOW recovering from. But hey...Thanks for ridding us of those 3500 Palm Beach Gore votes and effectively destroying The Reform Party, Paddy! Now, get lost.
It's a natural process, some have bigger birth rates then others, and I really think that Pat Buchanan should realise it. Unless he thinks that it shouldn't be so and it has to be "fixed". I can only wonder what that would mean. Oh, and I am a "white European", according to Pat one of the endangered. Funny, i don't feel that way.
NP, Why not?? The 90s conservatives {globalists and their ilk} call Buchanan much worse with a whole lot less justification. They line up with the progressive democrats {globalists and their ilk} to do so. Peace and love, George.
I would like to know if you've read the book. Because this focus on race qua race seems to miss the point. I haven't finished the book, but clearly the book addresses that peculiar juncture where race and culture collide, or rather, synthesize. Surely you can't be ignorant of historical trends regarding race and culture, and particularly western culture. Frankly, I find that the discussion of race is only incidental and the primary focus of the book is on the death of the western culture, unfortunately for those of us who would discuss it, possessed almost entirely by those light skinned whities of European descent. So unfortunately the discussion focuses on the incidentals, i.e., race, rather than the truly alarming spectacle of the death of western culture. If you do not find this alarming, I would recommend you spend a little time doing a cursory reading of the history of the Roman Empire. The funny thing is, that what the Romans called Barbarians, are what we call whites and include among those races who form the west (the Germanic tribes). Yet, at that time, their culture was foreign, and frankly destructive. So while you may focus on race, clearly the danger lies in the loss of culture.
Furthermore, Buchanan notes the precariousness of the Israeli situation, noting the skyrocketing birthrate of the Palestinians. So, in your analysis, which race is Buchanan obsessing over in this instance? Surely you must know that they are at least as closely related as the Germans and the French. Buchanan is not obsessed with race--I suggest you look in the mirror.
Caldwell just now noticed that?
If your definition of that term is anything other than Homo sapiens, you've just violated JimRob's rules. Buh-bye....
I think there was a whole chapter on this one in How to Lie with Statistics....
Er, you might want to rewrite this sentence to clarify the referent to which those descriptions apply.
This is the reason Buchanan writes his books.
Stir up the faithful (just look at how many Buchanan threads we've seen in the last month), then others want to see what the pitchforkers are squealing about.
Buchanan loves a fight. Every book he's ever written has provoked one.
He may believe what he writes, but he knows how to use hyperbole and touch all the right symbols (the Confederacy, "whiteness," "Western culture").
IOW, he's a book publisher's dream.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.