Skip to comments.Missing Danielle Parents Allegedly Swingers
Posted on 02/11/2002 5:06:42 PM PST by Petronski
Larry asked them about it just now on Larry King Live (2-11-2), and they refused to deny it.
IOW, how do you know that that repairman wasn't at a swingers club the night before?
A really bothersome thing is that the alarm system indicated an open door (described in one writeup as an open sliding patio door and an open garage door). That evidently evoked no curiosity on the part of the husband or wife. I think the first reaction of any parent would have been to see if the kids were OK.
And the mom dancing with the suspected next door neighbor? Something smells about the whole setup.
She wouldn't even be my wife. But that is the difference in the sub-cultures of our society. They do things differently. They think differently. They act differently. And we are talking about sub-cultures. People who live on the seamy side of life don't have the same values as the majority. I am hoping that they are still the minority.
If you pick up some dude from a bar, you know what you are dealing with. There is a question about the repairman who you call to fix something. But you still don't trust any stranger that comes into your house. You watch that person, and a woman alone should never let in anyone.
Good grief. YOU sense evil? You call pete a messed up convict type? -- Pete was out there in Nam, putting his life on the line while you were acting 'tough cop' in front of a bunch of losers.
Your prior record of posts here at FR have real evidence of the 'evil' in your heart, as does the one above. -- Pete may be cynical, but at least he is honest to himself. You're a rank hypocrite, in my book.
You assume that there are wedding vows involved, there may not have been any, one CAN get married by a clerk at the County Court.
Two, you are using the word "violate" which implies that one of the spouses is either unaware, or opposed to the actions, they do not seem to be.
And you assume that I am attacking a Christian marriage, I am not attacking anything.
If anything, the attacks come from "good Christian folks" who have yet to offer a prayer for a little lost girl, or a prayer that these parents find salvation.
Go ahead, castr that stone, Jesus is watching, and He CAN sit in judgement.
Sneakypete was in Vietnam? Well, gee, so were a lot of us. And what does that have to do with such a poisoned outlook on life? Such a person needs help, not mere sympathy.
I will hold judgement on their parental ability until something far more than talk show and internet allegations occur. If it turns out they are involved in a lifestyle and that lifestyle directly contributed to their childs disappearance I will condemn them. For now though, I'll wait and see.
Sounds like the conversation drifted from cookies to making an appointment to meet at a bar, and maybe more...with the little girl present?
Very possibly. We don't know for sure yet just what happened. But a casual pickup or sexual liason with a total stranger would not be alien to these people.
I completely agree with you about that. Anyone who collects child pornography is very strange indeed. Allthough in all fairness, the authorities haven't given specifics on the pornography they seized. In today's world of hyper sensitivity, I think anybody that has a Sears catalog in their home with children posing in their Fruit Of The Looms runs a risk of being labeled a pedophile, sexual deviant, child pornographer etc...
I think that in this situation, the confiscated material is probably much more serious than a Sears catalog, yet the police are not very forthcoming on details on this case, so all anyone can really do is speculate.
If you'll excuse me now, I have to go get my tinfoil hat. I dont want to risk having the thought police break down my door if I accidently speculate on the evidence they have on this guy.
".......and again, just like the homosexuals (and their use of the word 'homophobia'), the pedophiles, other weirdos, and now these swingers, it's everybody else who isn't normal.
Nah, there's nothing abnormal about having sex with another man. You're "homophobic", there must be something wrong with you, not me.
Pedophiles: "Girls are sexual ripe at age 13. It's normal for me at 40 to want to have sex with her. What are you, some kind of prude or something/"
Swingers: "So what if I like to watch my wife get it from other men. It's normal, I'm a successful businessman, have lots of money.......can't be anything wrong with me!! You're sexually suppressed, what's wrong with you.
It's nonsense flying out of their mouths. So it goes.
As a society we have defined certain boundaries, one being the age of sexual consent. People are not allowed to have sex with minors because as a society, we find this to be repulsive, and have made that action illegal.
There is nothing illegal about "swinging". It does not fit in with my beliefs, but I do not impose my beliefs on others. As a matter of fact, I defend the rights of others to believe differently than I do.
All in all, regardless of the parent's acrions, the criminal here is the person who took the little girl, the parent's sexual preferences did not give him (or her) license to abduct a child.
It is not illegal to own Pit Bulls. If a child in my neighborhood is the victim of an attack by unknown dogs and I own Pit Bulls, I will expect to be questioned by authorities.
Most child abductions that are not because of custody disputes are sexually motivated. That makes any peculiar sexual behavior by the parents quite germane to the investigation.