Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Toward a wilderness utopia: Henry Lamb shows how U.N. is seizing control of U.S. land
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, March 16, 2002 | Henry Lamb

Posted on 03/16/2002 2:23:49 AM PST by JohnHuang2

Few people know – including most congressmen – that the management of 73,270,583 acres of the United States is determined by 34 non-Americans, who are elected by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. This land – larger than Tennessee and Kentucky combined – is distributed in 47 U.N. Biosphere Reserves, managed according to principles and guidelines established by the Man and the Biosphere International Coordinating Council, and set forth in the "Seville Strategy" and the "Statutory Framework."

The U.S. Biosphere Reserves are a small part of a global network of 411 similar reserves, which are the starting point for the implementation of the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity.

Each Biosphere Reserve consists of a "core wilderness" area, surrounded by a buffer zone, managed for conservation objectives – both of which are surrounded by an "outer" buffer zone, also called a "zone of cooperation." The function of a Biosphere Reserve is to continually expand, and to eventually "connect" with each other through "corridors" of wilderness.

The Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve was designated in 1988 as the 517,000-acre Great Smoky Mountain National Park. Today, the U.N. lists this reserve as 36,727,139 acres, with the zone of cooperation reaching from Birmingham, Ala., to Roanoke, Va. Neither Congress, nor the legislatures of any of the affected states, debated or approved the designation or the management plan.

At the first meeting of the delegates to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Peter Bridgewater, then-chairman of the MAB Council, offered the network of Biosphere Reserves as the beginning of implementation for the Convention. The United States has not ratified this treaty. Nevertheless, our land is being managed as if we were a party to the treaty.

The ultimate objective is to convert as much as half of the land area of the United States to "core wilderness areas," which are off-limits to humans, with government management of most of the remaining land "for conservation objectives." This leaves only "sustainable communities" for people, which are described by Science magazine as "islands of human habitat surrounded by wilderness."

This scenario is not idle speculation. The plan is well documented in the 1,140-page U.N. publication Global Biodiversity Assessment, which names "The Wildlands Project" as central to the management scheme required by the Convention on Biological Diversity. The Wildlands Project, developed by Dr. Reed F. Noss, under contract with The Nature Conservancy and the Audubon Society, calls for "at least half" of the lower 48 states to be set aside as wilderness. Through an incredibly well-orchestrated campaign, hundreds of foundation-funded so-called environmental organizations, assisted by federal and state agency personnel are working to see that land is converted to wilderness, corridors to connect the wilderness areas are developed, and regulations are put into place to control the use of "buffer zones." Still, there has been no congressional debate or approval of this land management regime.

Congress has looked only at small segments of the land management regime in isolation – never at the total picture as described in the "Seville Strategy," the "Statutory Framework," the "Global Biodiversity Assessment" or the "Wildlands Project." Consequently, the nation's land is being transformed into a utopian vision conceived by a handful of international socialists.

Just as the nest of environmental extremists have worked to expand the Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve, another nest is working to expand "Yellowstone to Yukon," an area that contains several Biosphere Reserves, and seeks to control all the land between Utah and Alaska.

When the New World Mine was on the brink of satisfying more than $33 million in permit requirements, the Greater Yellowstone Coalition, with assistance from the Clinton administration, called upon UNESCO to declare Yellowstone to be "in danger" and thereby triggered regulatory authority to stop the mining operation, even though it was on private property.

The Mexican-border area is also a hot-spot of expansion for U.N. Biosphere Reserves, including a border region that reaches 62 miles on either side of the border. A major goal here is to eventually eliminate the border altogether. Development activity in the region that utilizes federal or international funds must be approved by a committee of un-elected environmentalists and agency bureaucrats.

Environmental extremists think this situation is wonderful. They have been working for years to achieve this result. Far too few people – including congressmen – are even aware of the transformation, and don't want to be bothered by the evidence. Therefore, day by day, our land of the free is being transformed into the land of government control.




TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: enviralists; unlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last
To: all
I haven't done this in a while.

I stridently encourage anyone who wishes to use these graphics to do so!
May they be seen on thousands of posts until the day the UN is booted off our shores...

41 posted on 03/16/2002 10:09:57 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."

I guess it doesn't bother these people that throughout history, every time this has been tried, it resulted in decline, poverty, disease, starvation, dictatorship, and death.

42 posted on 03/17/2002 1:42:49 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
My wife works at a hospital [North Carolina], and she me last week that 48% of the births there are paid for my the taxpayers.
43 posted on 03/17/2002 1:48:43 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: snopercod
In 1990 over 90% of all births at Los Angeles County owned and operated hospitals were to illegal immigrants. Around 1999 over one third of all children in the LAUSD were children of illegal immigrants. The budget that year was $9 billion dollars.

Who pays for their free healthcare and education? Suckers pay. That's you and I.

Not only that, the LAUSD is constantly complaining about lack of space for new children. Guess why.

44 posted on 03/17/2002 2:01:01 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Here in our part of NC, it's the white trash that are the problem.

I grew up in the San Gabriel Valley when it was all orange and avocado groves, but wouldn't want to live there these days.

45 posted on 03/17/2002 2:51:32 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2; Sabertooth; Squantos; GeronL; Billie; sinkspur; Slyfox; San Jacinto; SpookBrat; COB1...
Toward a wilderness utopia: Henry Lamb shows
how U.N. is seizing control of U.S. land

Excerpt:

Few people know – including most congressmen – that the management of 73,270,583 acres of the United States is determined by 34 non-Americans, who are elected by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. This land – larger than Tennessee and Kentucky combined – is distributed in 47 U.N. Biosphere Reserves, managed according to principles and guidelines established by the Man and the Biosphere International Coordinating Council, and set forth in the "Seville Strategy" and the "Statutory Framework."...................................

The Southern Appalachian Biosphere Reserve was designated in 1988 as the 517,000-acre Great Smoky Mountain National Park. Today, the U.N. lists this reserve as 36,727,139 acres, with the zone of cooperation reaching from Birmingham, Ala., to Roanoke, Va. Neither Congress, nor the legislatures of any of the affected states, debated or approved the designation or the management plan.

At the first meeting of the delegates to the Convention on Biological Diversity, Peter Bridgewater, then-chairman of the MAB Council, offered the network of Biosphere Reserves as the beginning of implementation for the Convention. The United States has not ratified this treaty. Nevertheless, our land is being managed as if we were a party to the treaty.

The ultimate objective is to convert as much as half of the land area of the United States to "core wilderness areas," which are off-limits to humans, with government management of most of the remaining land "for conservation objectives." This leaves only "sustainable communities" for people, which are described by Science magazine as "islands of human habitat surrounded by wilderness."

This scenario is not idle speculation. The plan is well documented in the 1,140-page U.N. publication Global Biodiversity Assessment, which names "The Wildlands Project" as central to the management scheme required by the Convention on Biological Diversity. The Wildlands Project, developed by Dr. Reed F. Noss, under contract with The Nature Conservancy and the Audubon Society, calls for "at least half" of the lower 48 states to be set aside as wilderness...................................

Environmental extremists think this situation is wonderful. They have been working for years to achieve this result. Far too few people – including congressmen – are even aware of the transformation, and don't want to be bothered by the evidence. Therefore, day by day, our land of the free is being transformed into the land of government control.


I had heard this before. Hard to believe we'll turn our sovereignty over to that great human rights organization the U.N. is today. . .</ sarcasm>
(((PING))))))
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.
46 posted on 03/17/2002 9:39:53 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Go Here to see a larger version of this map.

47 posted on 03/17/2002 9:43:10 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

Wilderness Area Map

Go HERE for larger image of this map.

48 posted on 03/17/2002 9:47:51 AM PST by Bump in the night
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
The ultimate objective is to convert as much as half of the land area of the United States to "core wilderness areas," which are off-limits to humans, with government management of most of the remaining land "for conservation objectives." This leaves only "sustainable communities" for people, which are described by Science magazine as "islands of human habitat surrounded by wilderness."

Of course the environmentalist extremist wackos think this situation is wonderful, why not? As this article indicates "They have been working for years to achieve this result. Far too few people - including congressmen - are even aware of the transformation, and don't want to be bothered by the evidence. Therefore, day by day, our land of the free is being transformed into the land of government control."

49 posted on 03/17/2002 9:49:24 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Victoria Delsoul
Therefore, day by day, our land of the free is being transformed into the land of government control.

That's about 60% of the land West of the Mississippi.




50 posted on 03/17/2002 10:07:26 AM PST by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Sabertooth
LOL! Be serious.
51 posted on 03/17/2002 10:38:02 AM PST by Victoria Delsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: JohnHuang2
Not good. I do, however, see a problem with the UN holding this territory once we run thier sorry left-wing a$$es out of our country. Should be interesting.
53 posted on 03/17/2002 11:56:45 AM PST by Constitutional Patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne

Links to United Nations Organizations

 

Dag Hammarskjold Library

Department of Humanitarian Affairs

Department of Peace-Keeping Operations

Department for Policy Coordinationand Sustainable Development/Earth Summit +5

Department for Political Affairs

Division for Ocean Affairs and the Law of the Sea

Economic Commission for Africa

Economic Commission for Europe

Economic Commission for Latin American and the Caribbean

Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific

Economic and Social Development

Executive Office of the Secretary General

Food and Agriculture Organization of the UN

Humanitarian Affairs

Human Rights

International Atomic Energy Agency

International Civil Aviation Organization

International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia

International Fund for Agricultural Development

International Labour Organization

International Law

International Maritime Organization

International Telecommunication Union

International Trade Centre

Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights/Centre for Human Rights

Office for Outer Space Affairs

Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees

Official Web Site Locator for the UNITED NATIONS System of Organizations (English Version)

Peace and Security

Publications and Sales

Relief Web

Statistics Division& Monthly Bulletin of Statistics Online

UN Children's Fund

UN Conference on Trade and Development

UN Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Branch Information Network

UN CyberSchoolBus

UN Databases

UN Departments and Offices

UN Development Programme

UN Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

UN Environment Programme

UN Industrial Development Organization

UN Institute for Training and Research

UN International Drug Control Programme

UN Homepage

UN Office at Geneva

UN Office at Vienna

UN Office for Project Services

UN News

UN/NGO Link (NGO means non-governmental organizations)

UN Population Fund

UN University

UN Volunteers

War-torn Societies Project

Women Watch UN Working for Women

World Food Programme

World Health Organization

World Intellectual Property Organization

World Meteorological Organization

World Trade Organization

54 posted on 03/17/2002 2:12:22 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Biospheres or safe havens? Sorry to be a "conspiracy wacko" but maybe these folks know something we are not privy to. I mean why all of a sudden are certain folks so interested in the "wilderness".
55 posted on 03/17/2002 2:20:55 PM PST by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Davea
CONTROL THE LAND SEA AND AIR YOU CONTROL THE PEOPLE AND THEIR MEANS TO BE FREE FREEDOM IS NOT IN THEIR BEST INTEREST ITS NOT A CONSPIRACY THEORY ITS A FACT
56 posted on 03/17/2002 2:33:07 PM PST by ATOMIC_PUNK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
Nice links. Thanks.
57 posted on 03/17/2002 2:46:33 PM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: MeeknMing
I have already suggested that we deport all the bums in the UN and turn the UN building into a high rise homeless shelter. But none of the politicians listen to me - they would rather kiss up to the UN.

Your government at work!!

58 posted on 03/17/2002 4:01:23 PM PST by Brownie74
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: ATOMIC_PUNK
It looks like these folks are pretty clever in their long term planning. I suspect they have all their ducks in a row for the aftermath of an upcoming event. Sort of a contingency plan. The next "phase" of this war we are in might be very very shocking indeed. Might not be like a Kosovo, Afghan thing that we can just watch safely from our living rooms. We'll see. And we'll see soon. But how will they finance their NEW UTOPIA?? Is this how?...

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/648228/posts

59 posted on 03/17/2002 4:24:13 PM PST by Davea
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: B4Ranch
"Land...cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interests of society as a whole. Public control of land use is therefore indispensable...."

That reads like it came right out of the Communist Manifesto.

60 posted on 03/17/2002 5:17:51 PM PST by WRhine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson