Skip to comments.Statement by the President: "... I will sign (CFR) into law."
Posted on 03/20/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by erk
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002
Statement by the President
Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system. The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.
The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions. I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.
Don't they, too, have an oath to protect and defend the Constitution? After all, you get 2/3 of them to agree, then the veto becomes irrelevant, right? We came close in the Senate. Seven votes.
You argue like a populist. America doesn't elect populists.
Try arguing like a politician. Bush is a politician, not a populist.
Notice that the statement refers to "the reforms passed today" and that "I will sign them into law." Does this fit your scenario?
how? He'll be a hit with the idiot 'independants' and the media will love him (or not hate him). The courts will strike down the free speech ban and he ends up with a bill that doubles the hard money limits (which is a GOP asset). As someone said, this is smart politics. No different than what Clinton did to the liberals when he signed welfare reform.
I believe playing politics with an issue of this importance is inexcusable. Doesn't there come a time when a politician has to use his/her political capital to make a principled stand? When will that be? What issue will be important enough, assuming this one isn't?
As in "Excess" human embryos "already been killed"?
Take your pills first.
But he won't piss off the base. He'll piss off Free Republic, but that's not very hard to do.
"The base" isn't paying attention to CFR.
As someone else (me) said, I prefer strong principled positions over "smart politics"
The fact is that the media and the Dems boxed Bush in with all that Enron talk. It was masterfully done, and Bush got some bad advice, IMHO. This is not to say he shouldn't have fought sooner, but we know what he has to deal with, and we should have known we'd take hits. We have a Senate leadership without any guts, and margins so close in the House that 15 or 20 RINOs will kill us. We also let things get too close in the Senate, where Jim Jeffords' treachery gave Daschle enough power to force this though.
Quite frankly, we've dodged a lot of stuff, and had a heck of a batting average to date. Unfortunately, the other side had the passion to use their big advantage against us. Enron happened, then the media, McCain, and the Dems stampeded everything. We just got hammered, and quite frankly, I am not arrogant enough to say that we could overcome a media barrage that would be little more than the 2002 edition of the 1995 budget battle.
I had hoped for a fight, but there was something behind the scenes that happened that ultimately forced Bush's hand on this. Now, we just got handed a lemon. Do we have the character to make lemonade, or do we run home like crybabies?
I'll try to make lemonade, and be thankful this is the ONLY full-fledged defeat we have had to date. By all rights, we should have had a lot more.
So you think its okay to violate the constitution as long as there are not "too many" people watching....
God HELP us..
Teddy Kennedy is a politician, so is Dashle and Gebhard. Using your logic, and the tactics of venerated politicians, I therfore declare that you, sinkspur, are a racist.
This is the stupidest statement I've read tonight (and trust me, thats bad since I've only read one reply and that was from Twodees). You must be on crack.
The Loser column is full of a lot of pricipled guys who ran for office.
No. As in "no embryos will be killed from this day forward."
A reasonable position, as history has borne out.
Are you suggesting that GWB is the only conservative candidate the Republicans have to offer.. get real...
And then the Democrats will say..."All Your Base are Belong to Us!" Sorry, couldn't resist.
A veto merely angers the media, fires them up, and possibly triggers a third-party run by McCain which could kill us in 2004 (hello, President Hillary Clinton).
Am I disappointed he signed it? Yes. But I am not angry enough to walk away and give the White House to Al Gore or Hillary Clinton.
I hope something spurs us to action.
I think its time everyone took in a few deep breaths, and found out what exactly the CFR bill is going to do!
Depending who you listen to, it is the greatest or the kiss of death. Ill bet by Friday the whole tone on FR about CFR will change.
It does not matter how much money one raises it is votes that get one elected.
No one on the face of the earth can manufacture votes better than a democrat.
If President Bush signs this bill into law it is the end of the republican party except as a [to be polite]a footstool and whipping boy for the democrats.
Come to think of it, since Gingrich left, that is all the republicans are at this time.
trent lott and the French have one thing in common--their favorite flag color is white.
Just as his father was snookered by the democrats, it appears that the son is going to suffer the same fate.
And to those who think that this law will be a Godsend to the republicans, who do you think is going to be prosecuted for violating it. Hint: It won't be the democrats.
I know, I know, john ashcroft is a.g. and will be in charge of enforcing the law.
Question: Name 10 clinton croneys he has prosecuted since becoming a.g.He himself was an election fraud victim.
I took off my Bush2004 bumper stickers today. I won't forget in 2 1/2 years. My wife and I made 2800 phone calls for him in the 2000 election. I'll be sitting 2004 out. We are really upset.
Wake me when the government who intends to profit from ESCR (and funds the likes of ACT to the tune of 1.5 million a year) decides they'll prosecute those who destroy -- by "hopeful research" or otherwise -- the Leftover human life they've manufactured for profit.
Bush pulled a Clinton on you and you bought it. It's thanks to his decision that both the NIH and the Congressional Blue Ribbon panel have revamped their words to respect the window of pre-implantation human non-personhood President Bush nailed open.
Presidents don't determine constitutionality, in the end. The Supreme Court does.
And, when the SC strikes down the 60-day ad limit, what remains will benefit the GOP.
If I can think of this stuff, don't you think Bush's people are strategizing in the same way or better?
Politics is the art of the possible. Remember that.
I thought that was the point, that we had worked for someone who was different than Clinton. But now you're pulling the bait and switch, replacing a Democrat liar with a Republican liar, and expecting us to just take the crap we've just been fed. You should be ashamed of yourself.
I am NOT a libertarian, I am a Republican, who will never compromise on PRINCIPLE.. its okay to compromise on "issues" so long as it does not VIOLATE the principles of the Constitution.. that is simply inexcuseable...
You have mistaken the problem about campaign finance reform just as most folks have. It has nothing to do with our individual character. It has everything to do with government officers maintaining character. You see, this CFR is about the usurption of the first amendment in many ways; not in the correction of Congress rules which doesn't require legislation.
You got it all wrong; you are hood-winked by the Congress and the president that it is their right to bind you behind your back and beg for more government.
Great. Who is going to be the test case and spend the rest of their ruined lives paying off the scumbag lawyers?
ROTFLMAO! Me, a libertarian. Buy about 26 vowels and consonants.
I'm a blue collar guy and I know its unconstitutional. How the hell would President Bush not know when he has Solicitor General Olsen, one of the foremost lawyers in America, working for him.
Is that a quote from Marx or Lenin ?
The goal of electorial politics is to reward your friends and punish your enemies. If you think its anything other than that, you're naive. The courts are the referees.
Money buys votes. If it didn't, nobody would raise the money.
That very well may be the position they take before the supreme court. There is a process here.
I am not a lawyer, but violating your OATH to SUPPORT and DEFEND the constitution IS a crime worthy of impeachment... REMOVAL from office... not jail...
Passing and signing unconstitutional law does violate one's oath to the constitution. Prosecuting one who has passed or signed unconstitutional law is also unconstitutional.
Sinkspur is right. You'd be suprised how many people have no idea what's in the bill, and think CFR is well overdue. I've mentioned it in passing with folks, and they approve- no kidding! They like Bush for it! (They have no idea the others were even involved! McCain who? Who's dashole?)
Then why isn't the oath based upon the Supreme Court as opposed to the Constitution of the United States? Why doesn't he just tell the USSC, "I do?" I will tell you why, sinkspur .....
Article II, section 1: " Before he [THE_PRESIDENT] enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
We got beaten, pure and simple. Daschle beat us, and somehow, he and the media browbeat Bush into this. As I've said, this is the first real loss we've had. That stem-cell decision was 85% of what we could have hoped for.
You want to stop crap like this, let's get more conservatives elected. That's not going to be easy, so we'd better move on it. No use crying over spilt milk. Let's be frigging adults about this, shall we? Things do not always go our way, and sometimes crap happens.
Sorry, I can't wave a frigging magic wand and make this damn bill go away. I sent e-mails, and did I everything could.
There's nothing else to do but fight the next battle that will come down the line. Sulking is not an option.
Don't worry, gun owners are next.
The Assault Weapons Ban comes up for renewal soon, and Bush has already said that he'll sign it.
Perhaps you would include Simon of California in that list, oh genius of the ages, who stomped smart bet whimp RINO Riordan and now leads Grey Davis?