Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Statement by the President: "... I will sign (CFR) into law."
Office of the Press Secretary ^ | March 20, 2002 | George W. Bush

Posted on 03/20/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by erk

The White House, President George W. Bush

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 20, 2002

Statement by the President

Like many Republicans and Democrats in the Congress, I support common-sense reforms to end abuses in our campaign finance system.  The reforms passed today, while flawed in some areas, still improve the current system overall, and I will sign them into law.

The legislation makes some important progress on the timeliness of disclosure, individual contribution limits, and banning soft money from corporations and labor unions, but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions.  I continue to believe the best reform is full and timely disclosure of campaign contributions.

###


Return to this article at:
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/03/20020320-21.html


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush; cfr; cfrlist; silenceamerica
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581 next last

1 posted on 03/20/2002 4:33:41 PM PST by erk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: erk
I am sick to my stomach. I can't believe he's throwing away all the integrity I thought he had.
3 posted on 03/20/2002 4:37:14 PM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bruce Leroy
Dittos! I just read about it on Limbaugh's site. I am very angry at Dubya!
4 posted on 03/20/2002 4:38:14 PM PST by the Deejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: erk
This is pure politics. He must know it will fail in the courts. But he goes on record as being for 'reform', without having to actually live under the law. That's my theory, anyway.
5 posted on 03/20/2002 4:39:08 PM PST by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
really dumb George,send it back and make them fix it!
6 posted on 03/20/2002 4:39:37 PM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
Do you prefer the Checker (R) cab ride or the Yellow (D) cab ride to hell.
7 posted on 03/20/2002 4:39:37 PM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: erk
On a scale of 1 to 10, Dubya is making a 11 in mistakes.
8 posted on 03/20/2002 4:41:03 PM PST by ICE-FLYER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TrappedInLiberalHell
He has no stones to stand for what is constitutional!
9 posted on 03/20/2002 4:41:06 PM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: erk
Watch Bush's approval ratings from this point forward.

There are a number of things conservatives can overlook, but criminalizing free speech isn't on the list.

10 posted on 03/20/2002 4:41:21 PM PST by Interesting Times
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37
and another damn thing I don't want to hear his crap about protecting the rights of the executive office if he won't protect the rights of the first amendment.
11 posted on 03/20/2002 4:41:36 PM PST by linn37
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: erk
"...but it does present some legitimate constitutional questions..."

He's expecting the SCOTUS to sort those out and dump them in order to retain the few good items.

12 posted on 03/20/2002 4:43:22 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: erk
Damn him. Just another low life politician who doesn't give a rat's butt about the constitution or the U.S. It's all about getting and keeping power.

And I'm sick of hearing "don't worry the Supreme Court will take care of the unconstitutional parts." As president, Bush is in violation of his oath of office when he knowingly signs an unconstitutional bill.

15 posted on 03/20/2002 4:45:02 PM PST by NEPA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
He has to let the SCOTUS do the heavy lifting!
16 posted on 03/20/2002 4:46:03 PM PST by FSPress
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: erk
How many amendments do you guys still have down there anyways?
17 posted on 03/20/2002 4:46:21 PM PST by jodorowsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: erk
Well, it's time for me to move to New Zealand. Because CHICKEN$HIT, GUTLESS, HALFA$$ pseudo-conservative voters will go totally overboard about this and W will be out of office in '04, leaving us ripe for Evil Party domination. Why even give a damn anymore?
19 posted on 03/20/2002 4:47:21 PM PST by roachie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NEPA
"And I'm sick of hearing "don't worry the Supreme Court will take care of the unconstitutional parts."

Yeah, right after they "fix" the 2nd amendment and the Brady Bill!
20 posted on 03/20/2002 4:48:38 PM PST by 68-69TonkinGulfYachtClub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 581 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson