Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Brady, Gun Criminal?
NEWSMAX ^ | 3/22/02 | Limbacher

Posted on 03/22/2002 11:41:39 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection

Move over, Rosie O'Donnell: The newest "celebrity" anti-gun hypocrite is Sarah Brady.

Mrs. Brady "bought her son a powerful rifle for Christmas in 2000 - and may have skirted Delaware state background-check requirements," the New York Daily News reported Thursday.

Some people will do anything to tell a book. No doubt to increase interest in what otherwise would be a boring memoir, the gun rights opponent writes that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, "complete with scope and safety lock," at a gun shop in Lewes, Del.

"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that rifle, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."

According to her book, the store ran federal Brady Law and state background checks with much ado. But the book suggests she did not have her son checked, as required by Delaware law.

Delaware Justice Department spokeswoman Lori Sitler said the purchase could be illegal if Mrs. Brady did not say who she was buying the gun for and submit his "name, rank and serial number" for an inquiry.

"You can't purchase a gun for someone else," Sitler told the Daily News. "That would be a 'straw purchase.' You've got a problem right there."

Gun rights advocates were surprised to hear of Mrs. Brady's antics.

"We hope that it's innocuous and there's been no laws violated," said James Jay Baker, chief lobbyist for National Rifle Association. "It's obviously interesting that Sarah would be purchasing firearms of any kind for anybody, given her championing of restrictive guns laws for everyone."

Seniors United Supporting the Second Amendment told NewsMax.com it was asking Delaware and the U.S. Department of Justice to investigate "what appears to be a criminal act" by Mrs. Brady.

"Sarah Brady is infamous for her radical anti-Second Amendment positions and her work to strip the citizens if the United States of their civil rights. She is the head of an extremist group that is working to gut the Bill of Rights," the group said in a statement.

"Sarah Brady is typical of the anti-civil rights radicals," noted John Bender, executive director of SUSSA. "She wants to ban private transfers of guns for everyone but her and her elitist friends. If a black mother in a Delaware public housing apartment did this she would already be charged with a crime. I’m wondering if Delaware has different enforcement standards for rich white women.”

The group concluded: "Sarah Brady is one of the leaders in the anti-civil rights movement’s attempt to make all private transfers of firearms illegal. Along with other extremists she pushed Congress to make this type of straw purchase illegal. Law enforcement should show her what her work has accomplished."

Mrs. Brady became a media-adored opponent of the Second Amendment after her husband, James, White House press secretary to President Ronald Reagan, was shot in a 1981 assassination attempt on Reagan.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: antisecondamendment; banglist; moosewatch; sarahbrady
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-486 next last

1 posted on 03/22/2002 11:41:39 AM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Yet another hypocrite, not surprised.
2 posted on 03/22/2002 11:46:25 AM PST by Great Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Well, that didn't take long ;)
3 posted on 03/22/2002 11:46:36 AM PST by ScreamingFist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Typical elitist law-breaking hypocrite.

Eaker

4 posted on 03/22/2002 11:47:07 AM PST by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Breaking the gun laws in Delaware? Her son owns a weapon? What next? Hypocrite is too nice a word to use.
5 posted on 03/22/2002 11:48:04 AM PST by oldironsides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Gawd! What a hypocrit...Populus vult decipi ergo decipiatur (L) for "The public wishes to be fooled, therefore let it be fooled!"
6 posted on 03/22/2002 11:48:09 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
No doubt to increase interest in what otherwise would be a boring memoir, the gun rights opponent writes that she bought James Brady Jr. a Remington .30-06, "complete with scope and safety lock," at a gun shop in Lewes, Del.

Oh....It has a lock. < / sarcasm >

7 posted on 03/22/2002 11:50:07 AM PST by chemicalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Another case of "Privledges for Me but Not For Thee" AKA Diane Feinswine. I hope they find reason to charge her, HCI is dying a slow agonising death.
8 posted on 03/22/2002 11:53:10 AM PST by chuknospam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Law enforcement should show her what her work has accomplished."

Yep. They should lock up her butt in jail.

9 posted on 03/22/2002 11:55:05 AM PST by pray4liberty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Yes! Lock her up with the other scum!!
10 posted on 03/22/2002 11:56:00 AM PST by Destructor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
It's a left wing sport. Create the law, then break it. Shades of Bill Clinton. First sign the violence against women act, then commit perjury to try and avoid its reach.
11 posted on 03/22/2002 11:56:53 AM PST by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
"I can't describe how I felt when I picked up that ____, loaded it into my little car and drove home," she writes. "It seemed so incredibly strange: Sarah Brady, of all people, packing heat."

If the word "rifle" weren't in the blank, I might have sworn that hubby, Jim, finally sported a woody!

12 posted on 03/22/2002 11:59:25 AM PST by meandog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Limbacher cracks me up!

He basically changes the title of other people's articles, adds a few "Newsmax has learned..." statements to it, and then puts his name on it.

I'd say that he was ripping off his employer if he wasn't his own boss!

13 posted on 03/22/2002 11:59:30 AM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I thought this story would fade into the sunset....but I was wrong! This is getting some momentum

Ashland, Missouri

14 posted on 03/22/2002 12:00:56 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HaveGunWillTravel
Uh-oh... It's a left wing sport? So now there are laws to which the 'sporting purposes' principle must apply?
15 posted on 03/22/2002 12:01:18 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
A .30-06 in one's car is now 'packing heat'?
16 posted on 03/22/2002 12:03:22 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Sarah Brady, gunrunner. Kinda has a nice ring to it.

Come on folks: gun laws are for the little people! That's not sarcasm: that's how it really works. The rule of law is long dead and buried.

17 posted on 03/22/2002 12:03:26 PM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
What is so sporting about killing innocent animals?? TO me it's just a bunch of macho men picking on a defenseless animal. Some sport. I wish the deer came equiped with their own shotguns.
18 posted on 03/22/2002 12:05:13 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bang_list
Bang for another hypocrite.
19 posted on 03/22/2002 12:11:55 PM PST by coloradan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Your lack of knowledge of RKBA issues is preventing you from seeing the real picture. It's not about hunting, it's about disarming the public, putting the public at the mercy of the state and dependent on the state so as to better control the unwashed masses.
20 posted on 03/22/2002 12:11:56 PM PST by gracie1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Okay, you missed the point of that post. I know your position, but I was being sarcastic about another post using the word 'sport', and I was trying to apply it to these ridiculous laws, and the hypocrisy of...


21 posted on 03/22/2002 12:11:57 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Animals are neither innocent or guilty, that is a construct of higher mammals(homo sapiens). Unless you forgo the eating of meat, the usage of leather, or cosmetics, you are a hypocrite. Animals are for eating, at least the good tasting ones are, (MMmmmm venison) I prefer to bring home meat, the old fashioned way myself, and if I could get away with it, would do it as much as needed to feed me and mine throughout the year.
22 posted on 03/22/2002 12:14:31 PM PST by jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Furthermore, are you aware of the BATF's 'legitimate sporting purpose' provision? Second Amendment ain't about duck hunting.
23 posted on 03/22/2002 12:14:32 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
A hunter can make it as sporting [in other words, hard] as they want. Most of the time, it's just getting meat for the family. There are still places in the U.S. where most people pack the freezer with what they hunted. I don't hunt myself but I don't criticize anyone that does.
24 posted on 03/22/2002 12:14:45 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I would make contact myself, but alas, I can't do it on the company's dime.

The best way to contact us is through phone, fax and mail. If you wish to contact us, please do so at the following addresses:

The Million Mom March
The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence
The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
1225 Eye Street, NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20005

Brady Campaign Phone: (202) 898-0792
Brady Campaign Fax: (202) 371-9615

Brady Center Phone: (202) 289-7319
Brady Center Fax: (202) 408-1851

The Legal Action Project
of The Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence
1250 Eye Street, Suite 802
Washington, DC 20005

Phone: (202) 289-7319
LAP Fax: (202) 408-9748

I'll FAX one of the 3 articles floating around FR tonight and ask for an explaination.

25 posted on 03/22/2002 12:15:47 PM PST by rface
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Hypocra-bump!
26 posted on 03/22/2002 12:16:49 PM PST by stands2reason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
Oh....

gracie1: No, I understand the point...I have my own guns and a member of the NRA.

27 posted on 03/22/2002 12:17:16 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
It's not quite like that. I'm not good at explaining it...try reading God, Guns, and Rock 'n' Roll by Ted Nugent. He can explain it better than I can.
28 posted on 03/22/2002 12:17:26 PM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dead
There are people who waste time tracking duplicate posts. They have informed me of wrongly copying threads, some which Limbacher "robbed" the titles. Regardless, his slant is generally more interesting.
29 posted on 03/22/2002 12:17:48 PM PST by Tumbleweed_Connection
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
Regardless, his slant is generally more interesting.

I agree. His heart’s in the right place.

I was just pointing out that he really doesn’t strain his back doing the heavy journalistic work himself.

30 posted on 03/22/2002 12:21:29 PM PST by dead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
That Calvin pic is sure getting a workout today, isn't it? $;-)
31 posted on 03/22/2002 12:23:11 PM PST by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: real saxophonist
TO:
alpolwolf,shooter25,jerimiah

One reason I dislike hunters....I hear stories like this ALL THE TIME.

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (Reuters) - A frustrated would-be deer hunter who failed to find his prey shot at penned-in domestic animals instead, killing a registered-breed Arabian horse and wounding a horse and dog, officials said on Thursday.

The suspect, 20-year-old Donald Ray Bussey, was hunting for deer with friends in rural north Florida last October, the state Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services said.

He "apparently got frustrated over failing to locate one to shoot. After shooting at street signs, Bussey told his friends that he was going to shoot a live animal," Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson said.

As he drove, Bussey allegedly fired a shotgun through the window of his truck, wounding a horse and dog in yards he passed. He then climbed into the back of the truck and fired a bow and arrow at an Arabian gelding, killing it, Bronson said.

Bussey was arrested on Thursday on two counts of animal cruelty, two counts of criminal trespassing and one count of killing a registered breed -- for the Arabian, a swift and intelligent breed valued by horse-racers. The last charge is the most serious and carries a maximum sentence of 10 years in prison, agriculture department spokesman Terence McElroy said.

SO TYPICAL

32 posted on 03/22/2002 12:23:57 PM PST by Sungirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Joe Brower
No Brady thread is complete without it... Sorta like Coulter or Kournikova treads, but they have better pictures...
33 posted on 03/22/2002 12:25:11 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
If Sarah Brady broke the law she supported then she should prosecuted to the fullest extent of that law...
34 posted on 03/22/2002 12:26:38 PM PST by ColdSteelTalon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Well, that's NOT typical. That idiot should go to jail.
35 posted on 03/22/2002 12:27:22 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I reckon that the Laws she funds do not apply to her or her ilk.....
36 posted on 03/22/2002 12:27:52 PM PST by Alabama_Wild_Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
So what does this NUT have to do with hunting??? He could have gotten frustrated skateboarding and done this.

Eaker

37 posted on 03/22/2002 12:29:01 PM PST by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Great Dane
Of course, Sarah Brady is a damned lying hypocrite.

Brady claims to be against crime, but she was a long time crony of William Judas Clinton and Hitlery Rotten Clinton.

38 posted on 03/22/2002 12:29:50 PM PST by punster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
What is so sporting about killing innocent animals?? TO me it's just a bunch of macho men picking on a defenseless animal. Some sport. I wish the deer came equiped with their own shotguns.

Innocent animals? You should tell that to the numerous drivers who have yet to claim uninsured motorist claims against uninsured woodland animals. ;)

You could always contribute money to a genetic engineering company wishing for a shotgun-equipped deer species. I bet that depending on how much money you plunked down, you will get a commensurate response.

Besides, the sporting aspect of killing taste animals is when you have venison steak, venison stew, venison jerky, venison sausage, and make gloves or jackets out of deer hide and make buttons out of the antlers.

39 posted on 03/22/2002 12:31:22 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
Not so typical, and you don't hear them "all the time". There are about 20 million hunters; even one such story a week would be 52/20,000,000 = 0.00026% jerk rate; that's several orders of magnitude lower than (say) road rage "accidents".

...but I suppose if you're specifically seeking out such stories so you can say "see? group X is bad!"...give a bigot a statistic...

40 posted on 03/22/2002 12:32:49 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
You should tell that to the numerous drivers who have yet to claim uninsured motorist claims against uninsured woodland animals. ;)

Heck, it's so bad that even PETA is suing over a deer smashing up their car!

41 posted on 03/22/2002 12:34:43 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
SO TYPICAL

Actually, this is not typical. The news motto, "if it bleeds, it leads" is applicable here. And news organizations do not cover typical stories. When was the last time you heard of a news story about a mom picking up the groceries, or a kid doing their homework, or a motorist driving courteously to work?

42 posted on 03/22/2002 12:35:18 PM PST by Frohickey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2
The reason such stories make the news is that they are not typical. 'Man shoots son, thought he was a deer'. Has nothing to do with hunting. Has everything to do with stupidity.
43 posted on 03/22/2002 12:36:41 PM PST by real saxophonist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Tumbleweed_Connection
I guess some people should have guns but others not.
44 posted on 03/22/2002 12:37:26 PM PST by american in america
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frohickey
or a motorist driving courteously to work

Source please…….


;<)

Eaker

45 posted on 03/22/2002 12:37:35 PM PST by Eaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
You obviously didn't read the comments made to that criminal that shot up those pets. That's right. He's a criminal not a hunter.
46 posted on 03/22/2002 12:39:48 PM PST by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
In N Georgia shooting dogs is considered an act of suicide.
47 posted on 03/22/2002 12:42:27 PM PST by Chad Bagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
What is so sporting about killing innocent animals??

"Innocent" animals?? Do you have any idea how many other animals any given bear, raccoon, etc. kills in just one year??

TO me it's just a bunch of macho men picking on a defenseless animal.

"All God's critters have knives."

Some sport.

And oversized overpadded overpaid gorillas having meetings for three hours (aka football) is any better?

I wish the deer came equiped with their own shotguns.

Apparently you're unaware of the number of hunters who get MAULED each year by deer. That's it, pick & choose your statistics....

48 posted on 03/22/2002 12:45:05 PM PST by ctdonath2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
In N Georgia shooting dogs is considered an act of suicide.
49 posted on 03/22/2002 12:46:47 PM PST by Chad Bagwell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Sungirl
For your sake, I do hope you are a complete and absolute vegetarian. No milk, no eggs, no animal products for your feet or makeup. None.

Otherwise, your condemning sport hunting is hypocritical and your opinion is, therefore, irrelevant.

50 posted on 03/22/2002 12:47:34 PM PST by Thumper1960
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 451-486 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson