[rdf]

(btw Richard, the only reason I moved the quotation marks was my intention to make the passage read more clearly. I doubt anyone but you noticed and it didn't matter. And I certainly did not mean to mislead.

No offense meant ... I thought you were being a stickler for accurate quotation, and responded with a view to strict accuracy.

You can find the whole controversy at WND, searching under "quackenbush" Or you can go to www.declaration.net and find it under "news", going back to the first column in early February.

Regards,

Richard F.

[one2many]

No offense meant ... I thought you were being a stickler for accurate quotation,

In one respect I was. This gets down into what I call the "He said he said"s; the point being that both your side and DiLorenzo's side has been guilty of... shall we say.... presenting the other's words to our own perceived advantage.

So I guess it kind of comes down, at least to me, to who attacked whom first (and why).