Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Abuse scandal angers conservative Catholics
Boston Globe ^ | 3/27/02 | Michael Paulson

Posted on 03/27/2002 8:02:13 AM PST by LarryLied

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:07:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The Catholic Church's most reliable supporters, conservatives who have traditionally leapt to defend the institutional hierarchy whenever its practices have been questioned, are increasingly irate over the church's handling of the clergy sexual abuse crisis.

Commentators William J. Bennett, William F. Buckley Jr., and Patrick J. Buchanan have harshly criticized Cardinal Bernard F. Law. Self-described orthodox Catholics are denouncing the church's bishops.


(Excerpt) Read more at boston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: catholics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

1 posted on 03/27/2002 8:02:13 AM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: LarryLied
The anger has been voiced most visibly by conservative Catholic columnists.

And many conservative members have left the Church to raise their children elsewhere.

Mostly because we've been hollering about this since the early sixties, when the Church decided to "reach out" to gays because they wouldn't want to marry. Did anyone ask if no desire to marry was the same as remaining celibate? Well, duh.

3 posted on 03/27/2002 8:14:49 AM PST by spudsmaki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
''Catholic bishops who failed in their managerial and moral duty to protect innocent children should be sent to monasteries to do penance the rest of their lives.''

NAH JAIL TIME
4 posted on 03/27/2002 8:16:54 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt_the_brain;patent;Chemnitz;Palladin;Calculus of Consent;Salvation;sinkspur;Longshanks;
The homosexual chickenhawk boy seducing boy raping priests need to be denounced, rooted out, and purged ruthlessly.

But are so many homo priests so far up in the Church hierarchy that they will prevent it from happening?

That's the question.

5 posted on 03/27/2002 8:19:27 AM PST by Travis McGee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
1 Tim 4:1

But the Spirit explicitly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to deceitful spirits and doctrines of demons,

1Tim 4:2 by means of the hypocrisy of liars seared in their own conscience as with a branding iron ,

1Tim 4:3 men who forbid marriage and advocate abstaining from foods which God has created to be gratefully shared in by those who believe and know the truth.

6 posted on 03/27/2002 8:21:04 AM PST by berned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
"While liberals say the issue of sexual orientation is not related to sexual abuse - and there are no scientific data tracking the sexual orientation of priests who sexually abuse minors..."

These guys are totally clueless. Every predator priest is QUEER...and liberal. Not surprisingly, we have the libs defending queer priests.

7 posted on 03/27/2002 8:22:14 AM PST by kimosabe31
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
It's pretty well documented that seminaries, by and large, in these latter times have not wanted orthodox, ordinary male candidates,'' he said, ''but have rather looked to those who are more pliable or more upbeat with all the modern ideas, and therefore many of those who would have become faithful priests have not gone into seminaries.''

This is where the "vocations crisis" is coming from. God is calling faithful men to preach the truth, but they are being culled out by Sister Apostasia Feminazi and her ilk at the diocesan or seminary level because they are "rigid" or "homophobic" or "misogynist" or "triumphalist" or any of a dozen other liberal naughties. The real agenda is "we want no priests except misfits, so we can argue that female "ordination" and an end to celibacy is the only answer to the priestless church we've created."

There are a couple of bishops in NY state who seem honestly proud that they are producing no new priests at all.

Probably 20% of our bishops should be deposed and replaced. Certain seminaries -- I'm going to point at Mundelein in particular -- should be closed until they can be re-staffed with people -- men, primarily -- 100% faithful to the Church. And the various apostate "Catholic colleges" which are not Catholic at all -- DePaul and Georgetown and BC, this means you, and ND, you aren't going to escape either -- need to be forced to purge the heretics from their theology departments or officially disassociate themselves from the Church. As it is, they're guilty of false advertising.

8 posted on 03/27/2002 8:26:43 AM PST by Campion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Has there been anything like this scandal with respect to Catholic nuns? And, if not, why can't nuns be elevated, as nuns, to a higher position of responsibility in the Catholic Church -- and lead a parish? I'm sure there is some reason someone will quote from the Bible why this can not be so, but, it seems to me this should be considered. The "men" have really let down Catholics in a big way here.
9 posted on 03/27/2002 8:27:33 AM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
"...- some conservatives suggest that the preponderance of male adolescents among victims may be linked to a disproportionately high percentage of priests who are gay."

Someone at last noticing the pink elephant in the parlor? We don't need any more 'steenken reforms'. What is needed is a counter-reformation to dump those leaders of the Am-Church who wanted to 'update' the Church.

We need to return to preaching and practicing morality. We need to 'open' the Vatican II windows again and this time to let out the stink of those that used Vatican II for their own agendas.

10 posted on 03/27/2002 8:28:54 AM PST by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spudsmaki
"...when the Church decided to "reach out" to gays because they wouldn't want to marry. Did anyone ask if no desire to marry was the same as remaining celibate?"

I speak as an outsider, being an inactive Episcopalian, but this has been my impression over the years: that there has been an increasingly lower number of straight men in the U.S. and in several other countries willing to sign on for a lifetime of celibacy . I am guessing that this is largely due to the huge increase in emphasis on sex in so many areas of life in the U.S., Britain, and Europe. BTW, twenty years or more ago, I heard from a family of Catholic friends who had a son in seminary that the place had a pretty gay subculture. The son did not stay in seminary, but I have never known the exact reason why.

IMHO, creating an order of parish priests who are permitted to marry (like the Orthodox practice) would seem to be a very reasonable action to me, but my background is Protestant so I'm comfortable with a married clergy. However, my experience with female priests in the Episcopal Church has been uniformly bad so I can't say I wish that alternative on the Catholic Church.

11 posted on 03/27/2002 8:31:50 AM PST by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
Most of this scandal is not about sex-abuse:
It's about attacking organized religion.

Jews, Protestants: You're next!

12 posted on 03/27/2002 8:38:26 AM PST by Redbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
"Sister Apostasia Feminazi"

Is she a member of the same order as Sister Snowflake? If I'm not mistaken, Sister Snowflake is the one who does liturgical dance, and Sister Apostasia is the lector at meals who reads aloud from Rosemary Reuther...

13 posted on 03/27/2002 8:40:46 AM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
Most of this scandal is not about sex-abuse: It's about attacking organized religion.

No offense, but tell that to the kids that have been abused.

14 posted on 03/27/2002 8:44:29 AM PST by RoughDobermann
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
"Conservative" Catholics do not leap to defend the hierarcy and "it's practices." They defend the Catholic Faith, even when the hierarchy doesn't. The hierarchy has not preached against contraception. The hierarchy has treated the pro-life movement like a bunch of lepers, snuggling up to the Kennedys and Cuomos and Renos and Clintons. When "conservative" Catholics defend the celibate, male priesthood, or oppose liturgical sacrileges, it isn't out of blind loyalty to the "hierarchy and it's practices," but to the Catholic Faith.
15 posted on 03/27/2002 8:48:33 AM PST by Arthur McGowan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LarryLied
...Liberals are pushing for the ordination of women and married men and for a democratization of the church's leadership...
...liberals say the issue of sexual orientation is not related to sexual abuse...

I knew the devil would try to be helpful in these difficult times.

16 posted on 03/27/2002 8:52:56 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Campion
...The real agenda is "we want no priests except misfits, so we can argue that female "ordination" and an end to celibacy is the only answer to the priestless church we've created."

I am afraid, your theory is correct.

...Certain seminaries -- I'm going to point at Mundelein in particular -- should be closed until they can be re-staffed with people -- men, primarily -- 100% faithful to the Church.

I heard, ever since Cardinal Francis George took over, Mundelein is being gradually purged of the filth. It's a huge task for him and the enemy is still strong and kicking.

17 posted on 03/27/2002 8:53:00 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: summer
And, if not, why can't nuns be elevated, as nuns, to a higher position of responsibility in the Catholic Church -- and lead a parish?

The only nuns who want to lead a parish are the liberal ones. (They want power.) If a nun was runnng a parish I was attending I would quit.

A parish is for a pastor to run.

18 posted on 03/27/2002 8:56:10 AM PST by BlessedBeGod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
"Conservative" Catholics do not leap to defend the hierarcy and "it's practices." They defend the Catholic Faith, even when the hierarchy doesn't.

That is what makes conservatives better people than liberals.

19 posted on 03/27/2002 8:58:18 AM PST by LarryLied
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
...Jews, Protestants: You're next!

Somehow, I don't think so. These are not the official PC adversaries.
But the Southern Baptists and the Promise Keepers might be the next target.

20 posted on 03/27/2002 9:00:58 AM PST by heyheyhey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-82 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson