Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'They're coming'
The Washington Times ^ | April 2, 2002 | Alan W. Dowd

Posted on 04/02/2002 5:53:25 AM PST by Mr. Thorne

Edited on 07/12/2004 3:38:22 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: Chairman_December_19th_Society
:-) I here by give them permission to go live that way. Personally I like potable water, anti-biotics, and not dieing at the ripe old age of 50.
21 posted on 04/02/2002 6:37:44 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HiJinx
I saw an interesting dissertation on this subject, years ago, by science fiction editor John Campbell. The article was "Tribesman, Barbarian, Citizen", and in it, he offered up a theory that may help us today.

First the groundwork.

Campbell posited that there are, so far, three basic types of humanity:
Tribesman: Superstitious, subservient to his tribe and culture. Individualism is not an option, only the tribe matters. He is the archetype of aboriginal peoples everywhere; what's good for the tribe is good for him, what's good for the tribe is known by tradition, anything outside of tradition is bad medicine, and to be avoided.
Barbarian: Self centered, loyal to himself and his hero-king. The self sacrifice of the tribesman baffles him. Tradition is fine until it gets in his way, at which point it can be... modified (special circumstances, don't'cha know). He is the archetype of the 'rampaging hordes' we read so much about. He can take anything from tribesmen, but only so long as a sufficiently charismatic leader is in charge. When his hero-king loses his 'hero' status, he loses his king status as well.
and finally...
Citizen: This is the archetype of civilized peoples. A mix of self-interest and self-discipline, he works both for himself and for 'the civilization'.

Campbell's premise was that no inferior archetype could stand before a superior archetype. Thus, tribesmen fell to barbarians, who did not fight by counting coup and racking up good medicine, but by hacking their enemies to pieces and enslaving their non combatants.

Thus, too, did citizen beat back barbarian. The Roman Legionnaire baffled the barbarian. Where was his axe? His two-handed sword? How could he gain glory in battle? In the meantime the Legionnaires concerned themselves with discipline, unity, and tactics, not personal glory.

Which brings us to the middle east. The Barbarians have been watching the weaklings for so long; they were so sure. Their enemies avoided battle, they sued for peace, where was the glory in that? They must, therefore be weak tribesmen.

And then they pushed one step too far.

The Citizens' response, as usual, was baffling to the barbarian. Where their wounded pride should have demanded a massive retaliation, there was instead resolve, cold anger, and tactical planning. And then, when the Citizen was ready, there was attack. Consistent, ongoing, attack. The barbarian doesn't understand this whatsoever.

Similarly, in Israel. Where is the glory in being one of four men in a tank, as opposed to being a heroic figure with a Kalashnikov or an explosive waistcoat? Nowhere, to the barbarian. But the tanks seem to be somewhat more effective, in the short term at least, than the rifles and suicides. After all, it is not the Citizen government besieged in a basement, but the barbarians' 'hero-king.'

Also, the barbarian's treatment of tradition is a perfect match. Not only are the barbarian's cultural traditions well suited to their conflicts, but those aspects that speak against such things are... forgotten, or reinterpreted... so that everything works a little bit better for them in the here and now.

Really must see if I can find that piece. It was an interesting read.

22 posted on 04/02/2002 6:37:53 AM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: boris
You're right my god it's been all of 7 months and nothings been done. < /sarcasm>
23 posted on 04/02/2002 6:40:03 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: AmericanInTokyo
Your thoughts were the same as mine.

Send the word!
Send the word to beware!
'Cause the Yanks are coming, the Yanks are coming....

24 posted on 04/02/2002 6:41:24 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Great find. Give yourself (the highly coveted) attaboy
ATTABOY!

Flag me if you find it please.

25 posted on 04/02/2002 6:43:54 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Bingo. Every time one of those eco-nuts opens their yap, I just wanna toss my pre-packaged cookies.

Do you want to live with the constant smell of manure (main form of transportation, remember), B.O. (hard to grab a hot shower every day, when water takes an hour to heat up), woodsmoke, dung fires, etc. Oh, and don't forget, you're giving up: pre fab clothing, shoes, belts, etc., most modern drugs, especially penicillin. The AIDS cocktail is toast, get an STD and die. Get an infection and die. Get just about any disease, and die.

Oh, and fire up those natural childbirth classes. Not gonna be too many painkillers readily available...

Nuts, man.

I love technology.

26 posted on 04/02/2002 6:46:05 AM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Valin
Will do.
27 posted on 04/02/2002 6:47:46 AM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Really must see if I can find that piece. It was an interesting read.

Please find that piece. Your post #22 was most interesting.

28 posted on 04/02/2002 6:48:27 AM PST by xJones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I think they anticipated that the attacks would disrupt the economy a lot more than it did and, therby, foment a lot of civil unrest.

When I was young, we kids were assured that, althought the Soviets wanted to conquer us, the Soviets would never nuke us. If they took over our country, logic said, they would want it to be intact, they would want to be able to utilize our rich farmlands and our infrastructure. The scary thing about these Muslinazis is that they want to conquer us and destroy us too. They don't give a rat's carville about preserving any parts of our civilization or our land.

29 posted on 04/02/2002 6:50:01 AM PST by Bigg Red
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Pretty obvious origin: This guy was desparate for a column topic and gets paid by the word.
30 posted on 04/02/2002 6:50:42 AM PST by Hank Rearden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Coming soon in a theater near you: "The War on Terror"

Watch as the hometown heroes rescue countries in distress, feed the hungry and win the hearts of more than one grateful nation. Watch as the faithful fighting men return victorious to America with cheers and pride. Don't miss this stunning saga of a nation prepared to defend their homeland.

31 posted on 04/02/2002 6:52:50 AM PST by tiki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Please find that piece. Your post #22 was most interesting.
by xJones

I do believe you have an assignment.

As someone told me "Mother nature is a castiron bi*ch and she will bite you in the butt give half a chance."

32 posted on 04/02/2002 6:53:14 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
#1 - exactly what I was going to post!
33 posted on 04/02/2002 6:57:15 AM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bigg Red
They don't give a rat's carville about preserving any parts of our civilization or our land.

Yes it really is a negative philosophy. In Friedmans book "The Lexus and the Olive Tree" he talks about these people. They don't understand what's going on in the modern world, they know they don't like it and they'll do all in their power to bring it down.

34 posted on 04/02/2002 6:59:01 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tiki
"The War on Terror"

Your alternative is....what?

35 posted on 04/02/2002 7:00:58 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
They're coming
36 posted on 04/02/2002 7:01:34 AM PST by SMEDLEYBUTLER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
"We're coming. God may forgive you; we will not." Senator John McCain. You can dislike J.M. if you wanna, but he said a mouthful there.
37 posted on 04/02/2002 7:02:04 AM PST by Arizona Pard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Valin
I do believe you have an assignment.

Well, now, y'all will have to give me a bit. I'm busy wasting time at work and the book's are at home!

Mercy, have mercy!

38 posted on 04/02/2002 7:02:44 AM PST by Mr. Thorne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: boris
Every party needs a pooper
That's why we invited you . . .

sheesh

39 posted on 04/02/2002 7:03:35 AM PST by mombonn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Thorne
Well what are you waiting for? The question you must ask yourself is, what's more important? :-)
40 posted on 04/02/2002 7:12:57 AM PST by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson