Freud for Clinton haters

Orlando Sentinel ^ | 4/10/02 | Kathleen Parker

[Cvengr]

IMHO, those who propose Clinton Haters are projecting themselves, actually are only projecting their Freudian attempts to analyze their own self-hatred,....hehehehe,....I really kill me sometimes!

[Samwise]

So what is it with these Clinton lovers? What is it that makes them want to lick his...uh...boots and froth over his every utterance? Why are they in such denial about the man? I think their illness is akin to the battered wife syndrone. No matter how beaten and betrayed they are, they remain loyal to him and deny any abuse at all. And yes, Clinton failed every test of character that came his way. And yes, he betrayed everyone who ever placed faith in him.

[Hunble]

Oh Freud was very much involved. If you ever want to understand a Liberal, study what they try to protect.

My former friend was very close to me, but she would screw around with any male that came along. She absolutly could not figure out why I hated Clinton. Simple answer: to condemn Clinton would be accusing herself. My being loyal to my wife was simply beyond her comprehension.

Liberals were forced to defend Clinton for a very simple reason. They were just as guilty.

Now if Hillary would share her secret of how to turn a $1,000 investment into $100,000 return in six months, even I may agree to protect them. NOT

[EternalHope]

How can you explain the virulent hate that so many people in the right wing have for Clinton? It just seems inexplicable.

Woof! Woof!

(How can anyone defend Billyboy Cartoon? It just seems inexplicable.)

[MoscowMike]

Howdy

Again we are maligned unfairly and again most folks respond to the question rather than the eggregious charge underlying it.

Conservatives, as a rule, are NOT HATERS, hate is the province of the left.

Perhaps it is not incorrect to be hateful of a destructive idea, but liberals dont make that distinction, insted always impuging and focusing genuine hatred towards people who expouse ideas with which they disagree.

In my view this is how "liberals" became indistinuishable from nazis, one becomes what they hate because to embrace hatred is to embrace evil.

I find it outrageous to malign conservatives who strongly disapprove of being led by a cowardly, morally bankrupt, anti American standard bearer of deviancy as being hateful.

Hate just isn't our game.

[Musket]

blah blah blah. More delusions from the Left.

[skeeter]

I despised the man as a tedious, self-absorbed, self righteous liberal arsehole from the day I saw him give that embarrassingly long-winded keynote speech at the Demo's 88 convention.

Even his own kind booed him that day. But I guess their 'intellect' eventually overrode their intitial 'bilious' response to the snake.

[Hunble]

I give up, what does the word "bilious" mean?

[backhoe]

Liberals were forced to defend Clinton for a very simple reason. They were just as guilty.

It's very interesting that you mention that- during the events leading up to impeachment, I grew utterly disgusted at how the news media, the people in entertainment, and clinton's supporters in general would excuse any bad behaviour, no matter how petty or how awful, and I concluded that this was because, at heart, they were as rotten, corrupt, and amoral as he.....

[GSWarrior]

The hard core leftists have a hatred for any and all things religious. Except of course Islam. But Islam is apparently anti-America so its okay.

The "right wing conspiracy" theory doesn't really hold up. Many of the sleazy things Clinton did occured while he was governor--barely a blip on the radar screen. Nobody outside of Arkansas had ever even heard of Clinton, much less cared what he did, until he deliverd that incredibly long nominating speech at the 1988 Democratic convention.

[Hunble]

Is this a surprize? Notice how the Liberals are trying to protect the terrorists today?

Think about it.

[backhoe]

Good point, but at the time, I was surprised because I still harbored the illusion that many on the left were honorable people- I just thought the divide between me & them was less government vs. more, not decency vs. evil!

[FloridaGeezer]

You are right. Clinton embodies everything that is against my religion. I could not vote democratic because it is against my religion. The only way the democrats can succeed in the red area is to bring more freeloaders.

[breakem]

........liar, adulterer, murderer, drug user, hypocrit, thief, obstructor, what's not to like?

[skeeter]

I give up, what does the word "bilious" mean?

Bilious \'bil-yes\ adj [MF bilieux] 1. of or relating to bile, such as that which commonly rises in one's throat when encountering smarmy hubris from contemptuous lickspittle FOBs like Paul Begala.

[68 grunt]

That mf'er was a traitorous ba$tard! While that traitor was being indoctrinated in the USSR, USMC brothers died in my arms. You wanna know why I hate the sob? I'll never forget nor forgive the low breed, lying, piece of excrement!

[ShandaLear]

Oh, now this brings back memories! Hi Bob! ShandaLear aka Susan from the Whine Cellar :)

[okie01]

Human beings, mammals that they are, sense a wrong thing in other humans. They may not be able to describe it intellectually, as Brock suggests. They may not be able to label it academically, as Begala does. But they "know" when something or someone "just ain't right." Clinton had that effect on lots of people.

Bingo! An atavistic "sixth sense" that alarms people about two-legged snakes that can't be trusted.

We've got it. The Clinton-lovers don't...

I would wager that so-called Clinton-haters are much less likely than Clinto-lovers to suffer loss in a confidence racket, bunco scheme, con job, swindle or scam. Because, at bottom, that's what Clinton was (and still is) -- a second-rate con-man.

[RLK]

You have mail here..

[bfree]

He isn't dead yet? Too bad. Let me know when I came be happy again.