Posted on 04/14/2002 7:31:06 PM PDT by The Giant Apricots
Boys: The New Underclass in American Schools
April 15, 2002
I wait for my son as he stands in line after school to get his daily behavior report. The first grade students are fidgety in the line, which is probably why they are the "bad kids" who need the behavior reports to begin with. All 10 of these children have one thing in common--they're all boys.
Soon the little boys will wear the same sad faces that are on their behavior reports, next to the teacher's angry exclamation points. Like my son, they will trudge home and await punishment, knowing, of course, that punishment is what they deserve. Maybe it will be an angry scolding, or a "now your friend can't come over this afternoon." Maybe it will be yard work, or loss of their new toy. There will be tears and wails, but after a while the tears and wails will stop as the boys resign themselves to their fate.
It's good that these little boys learn this lesson about themselves and school early, because, for many of them, school will never be any different. Boys at all levels are far more likely than girls to be disciplined, suspended, held back, or expelled. By high school the typical boy is a year and a half behind the typical girl in reading and writing, and is less likely to graduate high school, go to college, or graduate college than a typical girl. Boys are three times as likely to receive a diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder as girls, four times as likely to commit suicide, and far more likely to fall victim to teen drug or alcohol abuse.
By every index, our schools are failing our boys. Yet little is being done about it, in part because of the societal misconception that schools favor boys, a misconception created by the American Association of University Women's (AAUW) 1992 report "How Schools Shortchange Girls." The report's claim of a "girl crisis" was widely publicized, the Ms. Foundation declared "Take Our Daughters to Work Day," and Congress passed the $360 million Gender Equity in Education Act.
According to Diane Ravitch, author and former US Department of Education official, "The AAUW report was completely wrong. What was so bizarre is that it came out right at the time that girls had just overtaken boys in almost every area ... it was like calling a wedding a funeral.... There were all these special programs put in place for girls, and no one paid any attention to boys."
Christina Hoff Sommers, author of The War Against Boys, notes that "The research commonly cited to support claims of male privilege [in schools]...is riddled with errors. Almost none of it has been published in peer-reviewed professional journals, and some of the data has mysteriously disappeared."
There are many dissidents within the educational establishment who saw through the illusory "girl crisis" and who have called attention to the plight of boys. Educational Consultant Joe Manthey, who filed a highly publicized gender discrimination lawsuit over "Take Our Daughters to Work Day" earlier this year, says:
"If there's anybody who needed special programs and special funding from Congress, it's boys, not girls. We need more programs for students with learning disabilities, and for retarded, emotionally disturbed, and schizophrenic students--most of whom are boys."
Michelle Ventimiglia, director of a Los Angeles day care center, says "our schools simply aren't made for boys. I see this every September when my students go into elementary school. Our schools are made for children who can sit still with their hands folded, who aren't distracted by a bug on the wall, who keep quiet and do what you tell them to do even if it is boring. Most girls do fine in this environment, but many boys don't.
"Children need physically connected activities, particularly boys. They learn best by doing. An early elementary school student can learn a ton of math and geometry skills, as well as problem solving and social skills, from LEGOs, building blocks, and wood working projects. Cooking projects are also very useful.
"Boys love these types of hands-on lessons and activities, but too often teachers find it easier to simply give them worksheets instead. And now, with so much time being devoted to testing and preparing for testing, teachers' repertoires are even more limited, which is bad for children, particularly boys."
Of course, as parents we suffer along with our children, and as our boys are punished we are punished, too. Every day as I pick my son up from school I hope for a good behavior report that can be celebrated with ice cream or a trip to the park. More often I face what I call the "boy parent dilemma"--when my son is "bad" do I punish him because he can't fit into a structure that clearly isn't suited to little boys? Or do I withhold punishment or censure and in so doing undercut the teacher's authority?
I've agonized over this question again and again, but I always decide that it is my duty to support the teacher. But I'll never forget the sadness of my little son who sobs quietly in the back seat after school because I punished him for his bad behavior report. Why did I punish him? Because I simply couldn't think of anything else to do.
Glenn J. Sacks
|
|
Looks to me like this guy is raising a real wuss. COntrast this with someone I know who rewarded his four year-old child for laying a beating on a kid who picked a fight with him in the playground.
The solution is clear - adult females outside of the family structure should not be allowed access to young males - particularly not in public places. The first thing they do is turn to totalitarian methods to control what they see as unruly behavior.
Unruliness is part of the male's inheritance. Punishing males for such behavior is the same as punishing someone for his skin tone, or a physical handicap.
Boys were made for summertime, while girls were made for the school year. Many financially successful people will tell you that they learned more outside school than they learned inside, which might explain why most rich people are men.
I don't have this problem yet, but my second son is much more active and less inclined to worry so much about getting into trouble.
I learned more from the football field than I did in the classroom. 75% of school was a waste of time.
I agree. Even today, I get my best ideas while rolling along a highway somewhere instead of when I'm sitting in the office.
| But this writer says that he knows that his son is not always in the wrong, yet he does not say that he sticks up for him.
Someone suggested above that this will turn the son into a wuss. I think quite the opposite. This is likely to produce a child who is fiercely independent and careful about husbanding resources that might be necessary to conduct 'fight or flight operations.' That is not a bad thing. I think it is precisely the wrong lesson to teach a boy that there are Giant Hands in the Sky that will come down and fix things for him when difficulties arise. There are no Giant Hands in the real world and the sooner he learns it, the better. |
You approve of a father behaving like a totally emasculated nonentity, not merely standing by while his boy is destroyed, but cooperating. This father is helping the evil government school destroy his fatherhood.
Which is precisely the purpose for which the Prussians invented government schooling, and precisely the reason that system was imported to the U.S. in the 1840's.
My husband and I both worked in the class room as volunteers. We got the impression that she was demonic or a witch.
I was on the PTA board and let the principal know loud and clear that she needed to go. Since she was a new teacher to the district her contract was not renewed at the end of that year.
That was the begining of the end for the public education experience for my children. We started homeschooling my son in the third grade and haven't looked back.
The last straw was when he got one for running on the play ground. I mean duh!
I took the slip back to the teacher with a copy of Hoff Summers book. I told her if she ever gave him another slip for anything short of physical assault I'd shove it up her ass. At 6'4" 310 I think she believed me:)
Good for you!!!
Thank you for replying. I wasn't familiar with you, so I did a "Find In Forum," without which I would never have discovered the thread about the three inch long Giant Bloated Ants. I'll have to thank you for that, I will now be able to sleep much better knowing that those things are out there.
All seriousness aside, yes, there is a component of angry sarcasm in my note.
Behavior MODIFICATION VS Good Discipline = "pink slips" and the feminization of boys.
ADD, ADHD far higher incidence in males thanks to WHOLE LANGUAGE approach to teaching reading.
Of interest is this fathers concern that he not undermine the teacher disciplinary tactics. The observations of a later post gives the best advice . Get into the classroom yourself and observe, if you are able to do that. That teacher you have told your child "he must respect", may not merit that respect.
Your child deserves the "innocent until proven guilty" status in your home.
Bottom line for all the above cited situations: GET OUT OF THERE.....Your observations are right on target and your child needs you to defend him RIGHT NOW.
He rails about the injustice, and swears to uphold it. This guy is a democrat.
As Nick Danger sardonically pointed out in post 16, it's one approach to preparing a boy for life in a feminized environment.
By way of example, here's a good anecdote:
font color="blue">Which leaves the janitor as the only employee with a Y chromosome.
font color="blue">The racial parallel is striking. If a company only hired white people, but had a black janitor, that would justifiably be labled racial ghetto-ization. I'm sure it has happened.
Thus, a company (school) which hires only or almost-only women, with a man serving them as their janitor, it must be labelled ghetto-ization by gender.
font color="blue">And that ain't right. For anyone who hasn't read it, I recommend The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers, available at amazon.com for about $12.
Many elementary schools have female principals too now, completing their gyncentric motif, given that their entire teaching staffs are female most of the time.
Which leaves the janitor as the only employee with a Y chromosome.
The racial parallel is striking. If a company only hired white people, but had a black janitor, that would justifiably be labled racial ghetto-ization. I'm sure it has happened.
Thus, a company (school) which hires only or almost-only women, with a man serving them as their janitor, it must be labelled ghetto-ization by gender.
And that ain't right.
For anyone who hasn't read it, I recommend The War Against Boys by Christina Hoff Sommers, available at amazon.com for about $12.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.