|This thread has been locked, it will not receive new replies.|
Skip to comments.JUDICIAL WATCH FIGHTS CLINTON IRS ATTEMPTED AUDIT
Posted on 04/18/2002 10:49:16 AM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
click here to read article
Fine by me.
I was taking my information from the Judicial Watch ad that I posted; you know that.
Actually, that's NOT quite what you said. You said it was public knowledge and everybody knew it.
I hardly think you can use something Larry Klayman wrote to defend something HE did as fact.
No wonder I couldn't find any Reynolds when I went to the market yesterday.
But not nearly as long as there have been people like you who believe everything is a conspiracy and everybody is a liar, except, of course, Larry Klayman and Judicial Watch; that goes without saying, huh?
Howlin ... Beth Klayman wasn't that woman I met at Lilleth Fair two years ago? You know ... the heterosexual one.
You and I have been Johnny on the Spot recently regarding JW. We know, we're two of Larry's spurned lovers. But let us not allow our pissedoffiness and gotjobbedmajorocity cloud the real work of Judicial Watch: Mailing shit. But lest we forget: There are "differently abled" telemarketers to motivate. There are 15 minute press releases to construct. There are lawyers to manage. There are lawyers to rein in from their mission. There are over 100 lawyers we're paying but still trying to find. But all are working in the sacred legal duty to generate additional work. There are motions and summary judgements to be taken to court! Filling in boilerplates! There are papers to be filed! Boilerplates to be customized! Letters to be sent! Female butts to be ogled! Threatening letters to be hurled! Phone Calls to be made without completion! Return Phone Calls Missed! Tailoring! Lunches! Dinners! Copying! Breakfast! Travel! Botox! Client paid Mandarin Lessons! Company Yahtzee! Boilerplates... boilerplates ... paper .... filings ... must eat lead ....
Whooo ... I'd feel sorry for all that activity if it wasn't being rewarded at $150/ hour. Howlin ... the last profession in the world I'd take is attorney, though I'd be one of the best.
"My, my, my ... once Burned, Twice Shy Babe."
Take it to the bank ... there is a Beth Klayman.
You sound mentally unstable.
Like I said before...this place used to have "breaking news". Now it's more like "breaking wind".
LOL.... glad a bought an extra roll recently as the supply is being used up rapidly.... Look for price escalations to follow soon. Heck it may just be a better investment than opec oil or the 'ethical Washington Watchdog's' donor list....
On with the audit and lets get this behind us as I'm sure there isn't a thing to hide or worry about. Ethicls being what they are with the 'eww' you know all is okay and above board. There are bigger fish to fry like the crimes committed by the current and previous administrations that need to be persued. And never forget that the Ron Brown death must be investigated but first we've got to get this audit mess behind us.......
GO AUDIT GO
Yes, "intent" never seems to matter to defenders of Clinton or Howlin's friends ... or is it Howlin I'd addressing? If not then I'm sorry ... it's just that the views of you two seem so ... well ... "indistinguishable".
No, Howlin is Howlin...Southflanknorthpawsis and goldilucky are the same poster.
Otherwise, how did goldilucky know how to reply to South's post #906, in post #904, before #906 had even been posted?
If you don't believe me, see posts #915, 1064, and 1153.
LOL... Well a lot of articulation going on here that's for sure... but clearly now that's another matter.. Some think they have articulated clearly but then they keep repeating the same articulations over and over and from thread to thread. Heck that's okay because it helps spread the word, you know just like a good sandwich spread, easy and smooth. I like to keep reminding them of some things myself. You know like the $25,000,000+ of dollars donated in 2000 and a $250,000+ salary. Maybe those things have gotten the IRS attention who knows. Something sure did it seems.
But not to worry as the 'ethical Washington Watchdog' has nothing to hide so the quicker he gets this behind him he can go onto other more important unethical things of the current and previous administrations. Gosh those fish just keep getting bigger and bigger. Who knows maybe he can land one while on the 'cruise'. Or maybe we can begin a little digging at the Ron Brown site.....
Why? You just told us that you'd "trust" Bush if he decided not to investigate or prosecute such a crime and you certainly haven't presented anything to convince us that no murder took place or that Bush is indeed investigating or prosecuting this possible crime. Are you just going to ignore the statements of all the expert pathologists in the matter ... just like you say you are going to ignore me? Well some would call that sticking your head in the sand. Or is it "see no evil ... hear no evil ..."?
Is that about it?
It is claiming you know about the Ron Brown matter when you don't which makes one a liar. It is claiming you have sources that convince you Brown wasn't murdered then not being able to name even one of those sources that makes you a liar. It is telling us that the source is Ken Starr when Ken Starr was never involved in the Brown case that makes one a liar. And it is claiming to have witnessed me being put under "the table" in a discussion about Brown with Howlin and not being able to even cite one URL or quote one exchange where that happened that makes you a liar.
Now is the concept sufficiently clear?
There is nothing wrong with Larry Klayman making $250,000 a year. I get the distinct impression that he is a very hard worker and firmly believes in what he is fighting for--government accountability for their actions, this includes both Bill Clinton and George W. Bush.
Sort of like you and Bozo the Clown, huh?
Have you ever had a date or a social life?
Impossible, he died. You need to keep up with current events. You can visit Bozo here.
No, I'm very happy with my marriage. But if I was looking, I wouldn't come near you. You know.......my being heterosexual and all.
I know you aren't particularly bright, but you can do better than that. Can't you???????
Pot, meet kettle.
You, Registered, of all people, should not raise an issue like that.
Would you like to discuss Ron Brown? Care to explain Howlin's distortions about the facts in the case and her lie that she knows the facts? Care to explain why she TWICE said Ken Starr was her source for believing that Brown wasn't murdered? Perhaps you know who the "others" she mentioned are? Go ahead ... try to prove me a nitwit ... or RUN just like Howlin does ... just like ALL you move-on'ers do from the Ron Brown case.
The only question we have now is whether you move-on'ers and friends of Howlin are democRATS or a new breed of Republican that are worse than democRATS. You ask, how could a Republican be worse than a democRAT? Well with a democRAT you know where you stand. He (or she as the case may be) calls you "repugnant" to your face. And you know they won't defend the constitution or the laws. With the NEW Republicans, though, they say they will defend both, then it appears, turn around and ignore serious crimes that threaten to destroy the election system, privacy rights and other rights established by the constitution.
Sorry.......your "assurance" means little. You make many claims that can't be proven.
Yeah, but you do and it shows.
Quite a coincidence, Registered! Are you humble too?
btw, like most females of the species, I'm rather dull and drab. Not at all bright or flashy. ;)
What can I say, Reg? When you're out of the loop, it's impossible to catch up.