Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate continues over 'The Real Lincoln'
World Net Daily ^ | April, 28, 2002 | Geoff Metcalf & Dr. Richard Ferrier

Posted on 04/28/2002 1:24:25 PM PDT by Ditto

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last
To: davidjquackenbush
Do you read him differently, however you judge the truth of the argument?

You misunderstand me - I agree that Licolns attitude was as described, I just happen to differ as to the legitimacy of his actions, which the Supreme Court also shared. The point being, why have a written Constitution if it can be shredded at will - or at least until Congress convened. After all, they can't convene themselves, it's up to the Executive to call them, which was (IMHO) much of the delay before they met. Given that Lincoln had a 2 1/2 month headstart they had little choice. Personally, I cannot fathom the worship of a President that ignored the Constitution, and basically made himself a dictator. If Presidents Washington or Reagan had performed similar actions, I would still feel the same.

And the branches might be co-equal, but that in itself does not allow one branch to place itself above the others. Ours is a system of checks and balances, and why have a written Constitution. James Madison (quoting Montesquieu), wrote in Federalist No. 47, that there "can be no liberty where the legislative and executive powers are united in the same person, or body of magistrates." The Constitution applies to Presidents in times of war, as well as in times of peace.

201 posted on 05/10/2002 1:14:00 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Just one question: the letter concerns his action in issuing the Emancipation Proclamation. Do you question the constitutionality of that action? It is the one he is talking about.

I really don't mean to divert from the habeus corpus question, which I gather is what you are thinking about. But please indulge me by answering this particular question about the letter which you cited. Do you agree with Lincoln that the Emancipation Proclamation was a normally unconstitutional act, made constitutional because necessary to the preservation of the Union (among other reasons, I presume)?

202 posted on 05/10/2002 1:30:33 PM PDT by davidjquackenbush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: davidjquackenbush
The only way anything unconstitutional can become constitutional, is for the Constitution to be amended.
203 posted on 05/11/2002 12:15:13 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: ravinson
It would suit me just fine if no Southerners wanted to serve in the military.

Really? How's your Spanish? Your Mandarin?

204 posted on 05/12/2002 2:49:56 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: 4ConservativeJustices
Self-ping.
205 posted on 05/24/2002 12:35:55 PM PDT by 4CJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-205 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson