Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A good time to be armed
Star Telegram (Dallas) ^ | 6 May 2002 | Allan Saxe

Posted on 05/07/2002 9:53:16 AM PDT by 45Auto

I am an unlikely supporter of the National Rifle Association and similar groups. I've not fired a gun in more than 40 years. I dislike hunting intensely and believe all firearms to be symbols of a violent society. But I am also a very practical human being.

I supported the Texas law that allowed concealed handguns. I believe strongly in the literal interpretation of the Second Amendment guaranteeing private ownership of guns. But I also hold that such gun ownership comes with responsibility and consequences for one's actions.

Since Sept. 11, my support of gun ownership has only intensified.

What if the pilots or others on those ill-fated planes had been armed? The thought of a gunfight on a high-altitude plane is frightening, but the mere appearance of armed pilots and passengers might have turned things around.

I have always believed that humans are inherently violent creatures. That gives no comfort to those who hope for human progress and enlightenment. But because of the violent nature of man, we must deter violence by armed means.

Police are armed. There are armed forces to deter aggressors and terrorists. In an extension of this argument, why not an armed citizenry as well?

One situation supports my idea of an armed citizenry.

About 10 years ago, a student told me a very frightening tale. She was driving alone on Interstate 30 late at night. A car with two men came up alongside hers. They began hurling insults at her, motioning her to pull over. She looked straight ahead, trying not to make any face-to-face contact. They continued their insults and tried to run her car off the highway. The mere description of it is frightening.

However, she always carried a gun with her, as she had night classes and also worked evenings as well. She pulled the gun from her purse and held it up so the two harassing men could plainly view it. The convincing way she held the gun and her determined look made the men drive off without any confrontation.

She was convinced that without the gun, the men would have forced her off the highway. By the way, she knew well how to use firearms.

Since then, the issue of terrorism has become front and center for us all.

Why not have everyone who is willing, trained and licensed to carry legal weapons be allowed to do so? I would feel more comfortable in public places if I knew that many people there might be carrying firearms and knew how to use them.

True, terrorists bent on suicide might not be deterred, but they might be stopped before their horror could be unleashed. This has happened frequently in Israel and others places plagued with terrorism. If terrorism were to be unleashed in this country, as some predict and fear, an armed and responsible citizenry would be a helpful addition to the fight.

Citizens have a right to defend their bodies, their property and their liberty. The Constitution guarantees that no person shall be deprived of "life, liberty, or property without due process of the law." Responsible people have the right - perhaps even the obligation - of defending themselves, their families and their property from terrorism, foreign or domestic.

We do not live in a pleasant world. Those who are against firearms unjustly and unfairly believe that depriving people of legal firearms makes us safer. They are wrong!

Please know that gun use and ownership is commensurate with responsibility. If anyone using a firearm harms the innocent, that person should be held accountable, swiftly and surely. I have always believed in gun ownership, but the tragic events of Sept. 11 and the ongoing threat of terrorism have bolstered my long-held beliefs considerably.

Allan Saxe is a UT-Arlington associate professor.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: banglist; rkba
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-118 last
To: alley cat
Allan Saxe is a UT-Arlington associate professor.

See? Not all academics are liberal pinheads.

You have to admit though, living in Texas probably had something to do with it. It's hard to imagine an associate professor at a state university in New Jersey, for instance, coming to the same logical conclusions.

101 posted on 06/29/2002 12:09:18 PM PDT by arm958
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: timestax
Allan Saxe is a UT-Arlington associate professor.

I'm surprised Professor Saxe hasn't been censured, condemned and/or dismissed from UT Arlington for this. In Liberaland, the truth must be crushed by any means necessary.

102 posted on 06/29/2002 12:22:37 PM PDT by Euro-American Scum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Euro-American Scum
In Liberaland, the truth must be crushed by any means necessary. 102 posted on 6/29/02 12:22 PM Pacific by Euro-American Scum [ Post Reply | Private Reply

You got That right!!

103 posted on 06/29/2002 12:23:54 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
bump
104 posted on 07/03/2002 8:18:56 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
bump
105 posted on 07/24/2002 12:00:15 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
bump
106 posted on 07/25/2002 11:17:32 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
"Why not have everyone who is willing, trained and licensed to carry legal weapons be allowed to do so?"

Good question, but for the "licensed" part, Dr. Saxe.

I can find no reference in the U.S. Constitution which allows any government official to "license" a Constitutionally guaranteed unalienable right.

"A well regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep an bear Arms shall not be infringed.

Self-evident, is it not?

Taken as a whole, however, you are moving in the right direction.

P.S. Over the past 43 years, I have used a weapon in a manner similar to (shown to, pointed at, never fired at the mutt(s)) your student 7 times to protect myself or my family. I am convinced that had I not been armed in those circumstances, great harm could have come to me or my family.

107 posted on 07/25/2002 11:34:04 AM PDT by Taxman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psycho_Bunny
And you have your head, where the sun doesn't shine.
108 posted on 07/25/2002 12:07:38 PM PDT by longrider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: longrider
Kiss where you believe my head to be.
109 posted on 07/25/2002 4:00:16 PM PDT by Psycho_Bunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

Comment #110 Removed by Moderator

To: 45Auto
I like the smaller 30 model. 10+1 and I can use the 21 mags if I want. Nice. I do need to 1911. You really cant beet that pistol.
111 posted on 07/27/2002 9:04:48 AM PDT by ezoeni
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: dax zenos
bump
112 posted on 07/27/2002 11:20:16 AM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
bump
113 posted on 08/04/2002 5:01:55 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
If pilots had been armed the Towers would still stand in NYC, the Pentagon would be damage free in DC and thousands of people would be going about their daily routines instead of laying in their graves, their families denied their presence and comfort. If the government wants gun control, make crimes committed involving guns a term deserving life in prison. As for me I will not obey any law that infringes on the rights afforded me by the constitution. I am not the one that has stepped away from the law of the land, those that oppose the law, gun grabbers, and the politicans that support them have.

amen to that! and here we have politicians who still do not support the arming of pilots and would rather choose to shoot the airliner full of passengers out of the sky. pathetic....

114 posted on 08/04/2002 5:11:11 PM PDT by christine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: christine11
BIG BUMP !!
115 posted on 08/05/2002 6:04:07 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
bump!
116 posted on 10/20/2002 12:01:06 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 99tango
bump
117 posted on 10/20/2002 12:44:31 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: muggs
bttt
118 posted on 10/20/2002 1:49:42 PM PDT by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-118 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson