Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Russians are coming! ^ | 5/14/02 | Mohan Guruswamy

Posted on 05/14/2002 7:00:55 PM PDT by swarthyguy

New Delhi, May 14

The economic decline of the Soviet Union began in the Brezhnev era of the 1970s and early 1980s when the economy stagnated for the first time. These "years of stagnation" marked the end of almost half a century of unprecedented growth and change, and have come to be known in Russia as the gody zastoya, meaning just that. More interestingly for us Indians, the Russians also refer to this period as the period of senility - marazm. One is not sure if the seeds of the demise of the Soviet Union were sown during this period or if it was much earlier during the Stalinist era or even under the great Lenin. But one thing is certain: it was during the gody zastoya that the moral degeneracy of the state reflected in the rampant corruption, cronyism, nepotism and rank inefficiency reached new levels. In a system where the state controlled all means of production and services, it inevitably led to shortages. The leading Russian poet of that period, Andrei Voznesensky, says all there is to say about life in the Brezhnev era in a poem about queues:

I am 41st for Plisetskaya, 33rd for the theatre at Taganka, 45th for the graveyard at Vagankovo, I am 14th for the eye specialist, 21st for Glazunov, the artist, 45th for an abortion (When my turn comes, I'll be in shape), I am 103rd for auto parts (They signed me up when I was born), I am 10,007th for a new car (They signed me up before I was born)

Very clearly, the train of Communism had stalled. The Russians even had a joke about how three generations of Soviet leaders would have resolved the situation: "Stalin would have shot the engineers, exiled the crew and got someone new to drive it. Khrushchev would have pardoned the crew and put them back to work. Brezhnev would pull down the shades and pretend we're moving!" Yuri Andropov, the urbane and reflective KGB spymaster, who took over after Brezhnev finally died, seemed fully aware of the malaise and more importantly about how far behind the West the Soviet Union actually was.

In 1960, after Col Yuri Gagarin's historic space flight, Nikita Khrushchev had promised the world that the Soviet Union would overtake the West in 20 years. As the longtime head of the omniscient KGB, Andropov was more aware than anyone else in Russia that the shades would one day have to go up, and if not done carefully, would lead to an uncontrollable explosion that would take down everything that was actually achieved under Communism. Yes, there were many great achievements, but this is not the time to discuss that, and I'd rather let Comrade Sitaram Yechury expound on them. Andropov didn't live long after that but not before elevating the relatively young Mikhail Gorbachev into the Politburo. By doing so, he was striking the first deathblow to Communism. One must still wonder if he did it with malice aforethought.

It was during the late Gorbachev period that I first visited Russia, to see the future. Forty years earlier, George Orwell had visited the Soviet Union and returned to Britain to exult, "I have seen the future and it works!" The Russia I visited in March 1991 wasn't working at all. One afternoon, the little corner store near the Indian Embassy in Moscow at Ulitza Obukha had just one measly loaf of coarse brown bread. The GUM store abutting the Kremlin where the Soviet nomenklatura (equivalent to our "VIP's") shopped had a little more, mostly babushka dolls from which a line of recent Russian despots disgorged each from the belly of the previous one. Thus, Gorbachev begat Chernyenko, who begat Andropov, who begat Brezhnev, who begat Khrushchev, who begat Stalin, who begat Lenin, who ultimately begat Nicholas!

Gorbachev's half-hearted attempts at reform, the much-vaunted Perestroika, and the rising tide of a new political consciousness in Eastern Europe, only accelerated the slide. Increasingly bereft of the empire and the salutary lesson administered in Afghanistan, it contributed as much as the venality and monumental corruption that gripped the system and that had left Gorbachev with little room to restore order to the command economy. Instead of producing quantities of goods at prices determined by Gosplan, producers circumvented 'the plan" and produced and sold at will in a parallel system working on barter, exchange and misappropriation. They reported what the authorities wanted to hear and did what they were forced to do to exist in the parallel market system that came into being without official sanction. Thus, in effect, a large but primitive and increasingly criminal market did exist when a botched coup in August 1991 saw Boris Yeltsin clamber atop a T-72 tank of the elite Taman tank division and clench his fist to create an image of defiance that captured the imagination of the Russian people and the world. That defiance promised a new beginning and a revival of a nation whose genius was crushed by a mindless ideology and a kleptocratic bureaucratic elite. In a series of stunning moves, Yeltsin dismembered the Soviet Union by engendering a surge of self-serving nationalism and following it up with decolonisation. The Soviet Union disappeared for good on December 25, 1991. The Yeltsin promise soon disappeared in a haze of vodka, behind which new crony capitalism thrived.

In The New Russians, Hedrick Smith tells us what the old Russia of Brezhnev and Gorbachev was like. Hedrick Smith in fact has another book, just The Russians, which is about the old Russia of The Readers Digest heydays. In The Oligarchs, which is about "wealth and power in the new Russia", David Hoffman tells us about what happened in the Yeltsin years when great power and wealth was cornered by a few, very few indeed.

What also happened in the waning Yeltsin years was the dramatic emergence of a former KGB agent of the First Directorate and later a minor functionary in the city government of St Petersburg in the halls of the Kremlin. First as head of the FSB, the successor of his first employer, and then as prime minister and to finally become president when Yeltsin retired, finally. Now, another new Russia under Vladimir Putin has begun to emerge, but one cannot understand the gains being made without understanding all the preceding Russias.

The demise of Communism meant the destruction of the economic system and the introduction of a market economy based on democratic principles. This meant that instead of even the most mundane decisions being made by the state, such as what the citizen will consume, what the factories will produce, and what the stores will sell, millions of new decisionmakers were making these choices. Prices were freed, but instead of goods reappearing, prices immediately shot up, causing huge hardships to the common people. It would be years before a semblance of stability was restored.

But, more stunningly, the vast public sector, all of Russia's great but inefficient production system, factories, stores, banks, farms, oil and coalfields, powerplants, defence and ordnance works, airline, railways, in short, everything of economic value other than private property, was sold - in theory, to the general public, workers and financial institutions. But, in reality, they were grabbed by a new class of crony capitalists, well-connected political hangers-on and former bureaucrats, people who would thrive under any system. These were the Oligarchs.

The Oligarchs wanted order, but the kind of order that was good only for them. What's new about that? Among the most powerful Oligarchs were Boris Berezovsky, a former researcher with the prestigious Institute of Control Sciences, and Vladimir Gusinsky, who trained to be a stage director and who once drove a Moscow taxi. Both were adventurers who came to great wealth and power during the Yeltsin years. Both came to own and control media - mostly TV - empires. While Gusinsky restricted himself to his media business, Berezovsky's interests were more varied. Along with a clutch of industrial enterprises, he combined a political career. He was elected to the Duma in the elections that swept Putin to power. Berezovsky was an early supporter of Putin. Gusinsky, on the other hand, took on Putin and paid for his folly when the banks pulled the plug from under him. He now lives in London, a fugitive from Russian justice. Berezovsky, soon after, began to feel the prickly sweep of Putin's broom on his back. He, too, is now a fugitive from Russian justice and is holed up in Paris. It didn't take much more to show the other Oligarchs their place.

With the power of the Oligarchs broken, Putin set about in earnest to set right the liberalisation that went awry in the Yeltsin years. A strong government not only was able to control inflation and industrial unrest, it also curbed the open lawlessness of the Russian mafia and the rampant corruption of the new elite. During a recent visit to Russia, one saw evidence of renewed and vigorous economic activity everywhere. The diffidence and hopelessness of the Gorbachev and Yeltsin years have gone. A new and confident Russia is emerging.

There will never be another Soviet Union where Comrade Surjit could go to get his cataract removed or that would straddle the world as one of its two superpowers. In its place, we now have a Russia increasingly seeking its true destiny as a modern European nation and an actively dominant role in the world. Make no mistake: Russia is still a military superpower. It has the natural and human resources, and the technological base to make it a great player in world affairs.

The facts also speak for themselves. Russian GDP growth has been the world's fastest growing during the past two years, averaging over 6.5 per cent. Its GDP last year was US$ 304 billion. The gains from investments in the Russian stockmarket were the second highest in the world in 2001. It has been recording an annual trade surplus of over US$ 50 billion during each of the last few years. With a savings rate in excess of 33 per cent of the GDP and FDI growing, Russia is on an investment spree. There is evidence of this all over. Everywhere you turn you will see frenetic construction activity. The shops are full and brimming with goods. If Moscow is now spruced up and more orderly, St Petersburg positively gleams. The fashionable Nevsky Prospekt would compare favorably with any great European high street. Putin has shown the world what an energetic and determined leadership can achieve.

In July 1991, I had a conversation with the then Indian Ambassador in Moscow. He vehemently disagreed with me that the Soviet Union seemed on the verge of imminent collapse. On my return, I learnt that our ministry of external affairs (MEA) considered such thoughts as heresy. Now, with the MEA under new management, equally focused in another direction, we seem to be missing the Russian story once again. Like it or not, the Russians are coming!

TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Russia
KEYWORDS: russia
The conclusion is a local angle; but the main premise: Russia's coming back. Is she, is that good, bad, ugly?

Or is the writer simply a fan of Putin?

1 posted on 05/14/2002 7:00:56 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
Isus Voskros!
2 posted on 05/14/2002 9:58:55 PM PDT by Stavka2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
The Russian economy may be improving, but isn't the population declining? At least that is what the CIA World Factbook stated.
3 posted on 05/14/2002 10:07:17 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
THE PENTAGON INCLUDES RUSSIA IN ITS ZONE OF RESPONSIBILITY ^ Posted by Stavka2 to swarthyguy On News/Activism ^ May 14 9:54 PM #15 of 15 ^ The Rodina has always prospered under strong leadership...especially when it's capitalistic in nature. Even the birth rate for last quarter, as opposed to the same quarter a year earlier, was up 100,000 live births. A hell of a jump.
4 posted on 05/14/2002 10:13:25 PM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swarthyguy
The Rodina has always prospered under strong leadership...especially when it's capitalistic in nature. Even the birth rate for last quarter, as opposed to the same quarter a year earlier, was up 100,000 live births. A hell of a jump.

That's impressive, can you give me the link please?

5 posted on 05/14/2002 10:49:09 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: MinorityRepublican
Was quoting what Stavka had sent me. It's his quote.
6 posted on 05/16/2002 8:24:55 AM PDT by swarthyguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson