I am as critical of the sexual morality of the last nearl four decades as anyone on this planet. But simplistic and over-extended arguments such as the above are my worst enemy.
Wake up! This has long been argued and been accepted, that the sexual revolution/anarchy between heterorsexuals directly lead to the rise of homosexual anarchy. In other words, sexual preferences, much like in a KKK society whose skin preferences supposedly transcend man's jurisdiction, whether coming from heterorsexuals or homosexuals, is ultimately becoming as vicious, idealistic and ideological as Nazism.
Wake up! This has long been argued and been accepted, that the sexual revolution/anarchy between heterorsexuals directly lead to the rise of homosexual anarchy.
The use of the word anarchy here is not one I would use. If you are saying the dishonesty and pathology used to underwrite the sexual revolution has been transferred to defense and selling of homosexuality, I quite agree. However, that has little to do with sex primarily as procreation.
posted on 05/21/2002 2:01:40 AM PDT
What was done in the '60s was to erode standards of rationality and emotional honesty to make all activity, including the heterosexual revolution, argued as permissible. These same eroded standards subsequently were applied to homosexuality.
posted on 05/21/2002 2:11:42 AM PDT
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson