Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ronald Reagan: A real leader with a real legacy
Micahel M. Bates ^ | May 23, 2002 | Michael M. Bates

Posted on 05/21/2002 5:30:46 PM PDT by dvan

Last week former President Ronald Reagan and his wife Nancy were awarded the Congressional Gold Medal, the highest civilian honor Congress can bestow. I believe that, if history is fair, Ronald Reagan will be remembered for his extraordinary accomplishments.

That part about history being fair is pretty dicey. For the people who fashion history, the deep thinkers, the intelligentsia, the media, tend to be Leftist. And that perspective colors their opinion of the man and his administration. To many of those people, Ronald Reagan was a mean-spirited simpleton who somehow managed to bungle his way into becoming the most powerful person on earth.

A decade ago, the very popular Bartlett’s Quotations included only three quotes from the Great Communicator, but 28 from John Kennedy and almost three dozen from Franklin Roosevelt. Even Castro confidante Jimmy Carter qualified to have six of his pearls of wisdom listed. When asked why Mr. Reagan’s words were used so sparingly, Bartlett’s editor had a ready explanation: "I’m not going to disguise the fact that I despise Ronald Reagan."

One of the former President’s most appealing traits was his capacity to shrug off such detractors. He had a sense of what he wanted to accomplish and did his best to get there. He didn’t need the approbation of the establishment press or to look at focus group findings for guidance. His vision, which critics often charged didn’t permit gradations of gray, but was always white or black, right or wrong, was unwavering.

Mr. Reagan set the stage for what he wanted to achieve at his first Cabinet meeting. He told his appointees, "Gentlemen, I hate inflation, I hate taxes and I hate the Soviets. Do something about it." Then he left the room.

So how did Ronald Reagan do on these matters? When he was elected in 1980, inflation was a major concern. Jimmy Carter had beaten Gerald Ford like a rented mule over the issue while narrowly defeating Ford four years earlier. Yet under Carter, the inflation rate shot up to 12 percent. Ronald Reagan’s administration sliced that by more than half.

On taxes, President Reagan pushed through Congress the largest cut in history, 25 percent over a three-year period. The marginal tax rate was 70 percent when he was elected; that was reduced to 28 percent, courtesy of the Gipper. The resulting boom reduced unemployment and lowered interest rates while inflation diminished.

On Communism, shortly after moving into the White House, Mr. Reagan asserted at Notre Dame University that, "The West won't contain Communism. It will transcend Communism. We will dismiss it as some bizarre chapter in human history whose last pages are even now being written." Only four years earlier, speaking at the same school, then President Carter had talked glowingly of how Americans were finally free of our "inordinate fear of Communism." Carter had bought into the notion that, like rock and roll, Communism was here to stay and we needed to accommodate the murderous thugs who made Hitler look like a slouch when it came to genocide.

He was far from alone in that view. Many foreign policy "experts" shared that opinion. Some even saw a rough moral equivalence between the United States and the Soviet Union.

Ronald Reagan knew an evil empire when he saw one and didn’t mind calling it exactly that. He announced the Strategic Defense Initiative, known to its opponents as "Star Wars." Whatever it was called, it played a major role in the collapse of the Soviet Union, at least according to observers as disparate as England’s former prime minister and the Soviet Union’s former foreign minister.

President Reagan was a clear, consistent voice for freedom. He personalized the struggle between light and darkness at the Berlin wall – an edifice erected when John Kennedy was president - in 1987: "Mr. Gorbachev, open this gate! Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!"

And the wall was torn down and millions of slaves freed from the subhuman misery of Communism. Ronald Reagan was a president of character and conviction, an individual with an infectious optimism, a leader with an unambiguous vision of the future. He restored to America a sense of patriotism, of hope, of renewed purpose.

God bless him.

TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government
KEYWORDS: legacy; presidency; reagan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
41 posted on 05/21/2002 9:56:49 PM PDT by GretchenEE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
THANK YOU for taking a look.

Cheers, a pint in your honor.

42 posted on 05/21/2002 9:58:39 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Phaedrus
Our last great national leader. Who will transcend?

That's a tough act to follow. Bush has the potential to come close, but he needs more Republicans in Washington to help carry the water.

No two presidents will ever be great in the same way, or for the same reasons. Events shape them as much as they shape events. If they are men of good character, they will achieve greatness; if not, they will achieve either infamy or obscurity.

You may quote me on that.

43 posted on 05/21/2002 9:59:56 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
ROTFLOL! I really do think the Navy should name a flotation device after Clinton. Problem is... who would trust it?
44 posted on 05/21/2002 10:07:32 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot
LMAO! I like it!
45 posted on 05/21/2002 10:10:00 PM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Thanks for the ping

Bush is a wanna be, he will never come close to Reagan. My father was one of Reagan's greatest fans. Part of that World War Two generation of unique human beings who survived the world depression and survived the misery of a world war and the Cold War that followed it.

The following generations, including mine, have no clue what they went through and the trial by fire that made them men of steel.

Ironic in a way, my father started to have the serious effects of Alzheimer's as Bush 1 came into office.

He passed away shortly after Reagan announced he had Alzheimer's.

My father thought Reagan was the greatest US president of his lifetime, which included Rosevelt.

I think that I will agree with him on that.

46 posted on 05/21/2002 10:10:53 PM PDT by Cacique
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cacique
Bush is a wanna be...

Perhaps. I'll reserve judgement till he's out of office.

As for Reagan, He is one of the truly great ones.

IMHO, Reagan, Lincoln, and Washington are the three greatest presidents this country ever had. I am loath to say that any of the three is the greatest - they are peers.

47 posted on 05/21/2002 10:38:31 PM PDT by PsyOp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp
Oui. Ce m'est. Continue le soldat. &;-)
48 posted on 05/22/2002 2:19:33 AM PDT by 2Trievers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
Just because the
button is right below the article which initiates a thread

does not mean that it's easy to find when you decide the thread is a keeper . . .

49 posted on 05/22/2002 5:32:38 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: dvan
My favorite Reagon line was: If something moves the democrats want to tax it, if it moves faster they want to regulate it and if it stops they want to subsidize it. Besides all the socialist garbage the dems try to lay on us, this sums up their economic logic.He truly is a great American. I loved to watch him just to listen to his quips. Ronnie, GOD BLESS.
50 posted on 05/22/2002 5:47:06 AM PDT by Charlywood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
Great post!!
51 posted on 05/22/2002 5:50:32 AM PDT by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
the greatest President since Washington.
The only other serious candidates put forward are Lincoln and Franklin Roosevelt.

The steadfast refusal to grasp or even accept permananent office is perhaps the greatest of the civic virtues modelled by George Washington. Indeed that virtue explains the fact that Cincinnati, Ohio is named after the Roman most to be compared with Washington in that respect.

History as expressed in Washington's example and ultimately codified in the 22nd Amendment judges presidential virtue in part by restricting oneself to two terms. In the two terms to which Ronald Reagan was elected he whipped inflation, got the country going again, ended the energy crisis, and transcended communism. He accomplished these ends, Iran-Contra notwithstanding, by constitutional means and with dignity befitting his office.

By contrast FDR spent his first two terms failing to get the country going again, failing to prevent the development of World War II (or as Winston Churchill styled it, "The Unnecessary War), and experimenting with various schemes of dubious constitutionality.

Lincoln's stature is associated with by far the worst event in U.S. history; like Roosevelt's military success its glory depends on the assumption that no one else could have peacfully achieved the historical ends (termination of Nazi tyranny or of southern tyrannical treatment of blacks). In Lincoln's case that arguably is true--but the gravity of the situation led him to a certain arbitrariness which was extremely controversial at the time and in more settled times would have been utterly unacceptable. And it took Lincoln years to settle on effective top military commanders.

Essentially I would argue that the difference between Reagan and Lincoln was that Reagan did not have to resort to Lincoln's methods because the situation was less grave--but the situation was less grave in part precisely because Reagan knew what he was doing.

In a very serious situation Reagan knew and did what his times demanded, over the opposition of influential people who disagreed with Reagan's methods and even his objectives--and who still think his success was luck. At present the Russian government seems to have instituted a flat tax with smashing fiscal/economic success. If they hold to that course and continue to see signal benefits such as Reaganomics gave us, Reagan's critics should finally be silenced. I did say should . . .

52 posted on 05/22/2002 6:40:09 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Henchster;MJY1288
Outstanding tribute, thank you for posting it, and MJY thank you for bringing it to our attention.
53 posted on 05/22/2002 6:49:24 AM PDT by McLynnan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Henchster;MJY1288
It's mine, .....

Hmmmmmm....I think it's copied from many of my Reagan complilations. Do a FR search. Unless you compiled these quotes/dates in this particular format prior to Spring of 1998. When you do copy, please utilized the source code for the links. I enjoy all President Ronald Reagan threads.

54 posted on 05/22/2002 7:06:00 AM PDT by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: dvan
I will second that
55 posted on 05/22/2002 8:04:10 AM PDT by winodog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dvan
I saw speak Ronnie twice and both times it left a very lasting impression on me. The most memorable quotes about the presidency was;

"Some seek the presidency because they want to be something. I seek the presidency because I want to accomplish something."

Since that day I have always asked which one an office seeker is before I cast my vote.

56 posted on 05/29/2002 2:48:39 PM PDT by Diogenes of Sinope
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PsyOp

“There are those in America today who have come to depend absolutely on government for their security. And when government fails they seek to rectify that failure in the form of granting government more power. So, as government has failed to control crime and violence with the means given it by the Constitution, they seek to give it more power at the expense of the Constitution. But in doing so, in their willingness to give up their arms in the name of safety, they are really giving up their protection from what has always been the chief source of despotism—government. Lord Acton said power corrupts. Surely then, if this is true, the more power we give the government the more corrupt it will become. And if we give it the power to confiscate our arms we also give up the ultimate means to combat that corrupt power. In doing so we can only assure that we will eventually be totally subject to it.” — Ronald Reagan.

57 posted on 04/23/2007 9:16:15 AM PDT by PsyOp (Any dangerous spot is tenable if brave men will make it so. - John F. Kennedy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson