Skip to comments.
Report: CIA knew two Sept. 11 hijackers in U.S
cnn.com ^
| June 2, 2002 Posted: 12:46 PM EDT (1646 GMT)
| Reuters
Posted on 06/02/2002 11:14:32 AM PDT by Spar
Edited on 04/29/2004 2:00:36 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
To: Spar
How do we know they didn't?
41
posted on
06/02/2002 1:34:38 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Reactionary
speaking of WTC--they were done by men who fought with the Bosnian Muslim jihad. So Muslims with links to Bosnia were also ignored/overlooked.
42
posted on
06/02/2002 1:47:02 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: marajade
I know because the articles I linked in post #2 say as much.
43
posted on
06/02/2002 1:48:13 PM PDT
by
Spar
To: Spar
Even still if the FBI didn't have PC that means nothing...
44
posted on
06/02/2002 1:50:08 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Spar
As a follow up at that time the FBI could only investigate domestic crimes so an investigation in Chechnea (sp?) again means nothing...
45
posted on
06/02/2002 1:51:28 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Spar
Incredible...these CIA/FBI directors and managers should be offered "hemlock".
To: Spar
Does everybody have amnesia? KLINTOON wasn't interested in going after Al Quaeda. KLINTOON sided with the UBL-linked MUSLIMS in the BOSNIAN WAR. KLINTOON learned nothing form the '93 bombing of the WTC. This is where the "what did he know and when did he know it" should start. We sent troops in to fight with the Muslims in Bosnia, right? Despite their UBL links - unbelievable.
47
posted on
06/02/2002 2:03:35 PM PDT
by
jrlc
To: Reactionary
Go google John O'Neill and his investigation of the USS Cole.
48
posted on
06/02/2002 2:43:55 PM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: swarthyguy;OKCSubmariner;rdavis84;aristeides;iwentsouth;Ann Archy;Fred Mertz
The answer to your question "We were/are kissing Saudi A#ss?
Yes!
But if you dare flesh that out with $$$$$ Bush Family-Saudi-Big -Oil-Carlyle Business $$$$$$,you get flamed .
49
posted on
06/02/2002 2:49:17 PM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: rdavis84
thanks for the music!
50
posted on
06/02/2002 2:50:26 PM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: Betty Jo
It's the central question of this war. How to cut the Saudi Gordian knot? A good start would be to state who or what we're fighting against. Terror? Terrorism is a tactic; who's sponsoring it, encouraging it, financing it, implementing and using it a policy of the state. What state - The Tragic Kingdom of the Saudis, and their lapdogs, the Pakistanis. However, not having a country to fight against, no declaration of war means we have this nebulous enemy, a stateless man who leads a shadowy organisation called the alqaeda.
That's if you buy that he's estranged from the Saudis in the first place. How many sympathisers does he have among the 5/7000 princes? We know how popular he is among the general population.
I'm very pessimistic today. Terror as a tactic seems to have worked! Our PC attitudes seem to have run amuck.
To: swarthyguy
The Saudis are good at playing both sides of the street.
On the one hand, the repressive monarchy doesn't want to be thrown out of power, on the other hand if they sponsor Binny, he leaves them alone
As more and more time and $$$$$ go down the ratholes,more and more Americans will start to ask questions.
By then it may be too late!
52
posted on
06/02/2002 3:15:42 PM PDT
by
Betty Jo
To: M. Thatcher
That 9-11 is entirely the result of the muckups, corruption, and treason of the previous administration. 100 percent of it. And you are terrified that you can't blame Bush.Oh, that must be it.
To: marajade
Precisely, which means your posting a lie.Huh? Which part of my post is a lie? Be specific.
To: Alan Chapman
That he was fundraising...
55
posted on
06/02/2002 3:22:58 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: ilgipper
Excellent Point
This is the only place you will ever read that.
56
posted on
06/02/2002 3:24:16 PM PDT
by
jdontom
To: marajade
That he was fundraising...I said campaigning, not fundraising. You know, like when politicians promise things like farm subsidies so farmers will vote for them and prescription-drug subsudizes so seniors will vote for them.
To: Alan Chapman
He wasn't campaigning either...
58
posted on
06/02/2002 3:27:33 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: Alan Chapman
He was already elected...
59
posted on
06/02/2002 3:28:27 PM PDT
by
marajade
To: marajade
He wasn't campaigning either...He was already elected...He's been campaigning since he was elected. He's been flying around the country to speak to various groups about the things government is going to give them, and meeting with Republican candidates who are running for office in the next election cycle.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson