Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Discoveries In Syria Confirm Theory On Spread Of Early Civilization
Newswise.com ^ | 6-2-2002 | Carrie Golus

Posted on 06/03/2002 1:42:03 PM PDT by blam

Contact: Carrie Golus
(773) 702-8359
cgolus@uchicago.edu

New discoveries in Syria confirm theory on spread of early civilization

Unique artifacts unearthed this season in Syria will force historians and archaeologists to rewrite the history books, because the traditional view of how civilization developed is looking increasingly wrong.

A cooperative expedition between the University of Chicago and the Syrian Directorate of Antiquities has uncovered the hallmarks of urban life in Syria a little after 4,000 B.C., a time when civilization was thought to be restricted to Mesopotamia. Already during initial excavations in 1999, discoveries at Hamoukar in northeastern Syria began to suggest that the standard view of where and how civilization first came about--in southern Mesopotamia, spreading to neighboring regions--was in need of revision.

Now, additional evidence, discovered this season by University of Chicago archaeologist McGuire Gibson and co-director Amr al-Azm of the Syrian Directorate General of Antiquities, strengthens the case for a different view.

According to traditional scholarship, civilization began in Mesopotamia and came about with the growth of cities and the development of writing. But Al-Azm and Gibson argue that the turning point in the development of civilization was not cities and writing originating in Mesopotamia, as commonly held, but deep changes in social structure that happened in more than one place at once. "Hamoukar," says Al-Azm, "is significant precisely because it may not be unique, but typical of these changes." The new objects found by the joint expedition imply hierarchy, bureaucracy, and even kingship in the early fourth millennium B.C., the earliest clear signs of complex society in ancient Syria.

This season's finds confirm the excavators' initial hypotheses and add new evidence. In completing the third season, the Syrian-American Expedition to Hamoukar further exposed a monumental city wall and unearthed a well-planned and solidly constructed building. These elaborate structures would have been necessary to house complex institutions like bureaucracy, specialized craft production, and centralized government.

A range of new artifacts also points toward social complexity. These artifacts include sharply differentiated sets of stamp seals: small, minimally decorated seals with simple geometric patterns vs. bigger seals with images of animals like lions. The differences between the seals indicate a bureaucracy with low-level functionaries, higher-ups and perhaps a king at the top. They are the clearest signs of complex society that have yet been found at the site. Impressions of cylinder seals, also newly discovered this season, are proof of cultural contact with southern Mesopotamia, which is beginning to look like a sharer of, rather than the only source of, early civilization.

"Although the settlement, at 15 hectares--about 33 acres--is smaller than what scholars usually call a city, it is clearly functioning as a city," said Gibson. "And at this early period the site also lacks writing, but it has signs of accounting, specialization, and government, things we associate with cities. Hamoukar has the appearance of a critical step in the history of civilization."

"Now we can see where it's all leading," said Al-Azm. "We've had Neolithic villages, we've had large cities, but in between we've had a gray area. Now we have a picture of what was in between."

Before work at Hamoukar began, evidence from other sites had already raised suspicions that the growth of civilization was both more diffuse (a multi-centered process, rather than with a single origin) and earlier (beginning before 3500 B.C.) than supposed. Excavations at other fourth millennium sites in Syria (Tell Brak) and Turkey (Arslantepe) provided support, but this year's finds at Hamoukar begin to confirm the case by giving explicit evidence of accounting, hierarchical bureaucracy and cultural contacts, all in a single coherent context.

The city wall, seen only in a small section during the 1999 season, has now been traced to a length of more than 20 meters. The wall dates to some time before 3,500 B.C.--that is, before colonizers from southern Mesopotamia established themselves on the site. During the first season of the expedition, researchers found large, ovoid ovens of a type not normal for private houses, but often associated institutions with a hierarchy of personnel to feed, such as temples or palaces.

Taken together, this season's finds indicate a new degree of complexity. In the digs, a burned building was unearthed that provided a freeze-frame of culture at Hamoukar. Buried under the building's debris were hundreds of artifacts, in place as they had been during the last minutes of the life of the institution. Large storage jars, stone vessels, mortars and pestles, and unusual, possibly ceremonial objects were found in one room. An extraordinary item is a large bone facsimile of a sheathed dagger, which hints at a sophistication in metal-working remarkable for the fourth millennium, when copper and bronze were first being developed. It may have belonged to someone of high status. In the same room, but also in others, there were found more than three hundred pieces of clay that had been used to seal up boxes, bags, baskets, jars, and doors, all indicating a complex administrative structure for the society.

The finding of impressions of cylinder seals--a strictly southern Mesopotamian form--on clay in this building at Hamoukar means that the people here were in contact with the south. In at least two instances, there were both cylinder seal impressions and stamp seal impressions on the same piece of clay, w hich may possibly indicate the actual physical presence of southerners at Hamoukar by this time, and certainly implies close contact. Compared to the stamp seals and impressions found in the earlier season, the ones from the burned building are bigger and more complex, signs of difference between high and low status officials. A black stone stamp seal, in the form of two bears sitting on their haunches and kissing, is a unique item. "To see that these were not friendly teddies," Gibson explained, "you need only look at the stamping surface on the base, where there's a vulture surrounded by human and animal body parts."

Perhaps the most important seal imprinted on clay was a large, rectangular artifact showing a lion biting the leg of a goat, which turns to try to escape. Lions, in later Mesopotamian art, are closely associated with kings, and it is reasonable to assume that the several types of large seals with lion hunts were used by local rulers. An outstanding example of a bone stamp seal, which shows a lion attacking a horned animal, was found in a pit in the oven area behind the burned building.

Gibson describes the cumulative result of this evidence--the administrative artifacts, the institutional-scale ovens, the large, central building, and the city wall: "They show that bureaucracy, accounting, social stratification and possibly the position of kingship all were being created earlier than we thought, at a time before southern colonists arrived to occupy the territory. Clearly, the north was relating to the south as an equal rather than as an undeveloped resource area that was peripheral to a 'civilized' south." This evidence of equality in development implies that there was a long, prior development of complexity, not just in Iraq but also in Syria, and arguably in Turkey and Iran.

This season's work at Hamoukar is beginning to make inescapable the conclusion that cities and the other hallmarks of civilization (stratification, craft specialization, monumental architecture, monumental artwork, government above a tribal level, writing, etc.) were coming into being in a number of places simultaneously in the Near East, not just in southern Mesopotamia. In addition, says Gibson, it tells us something essential about how civilization began: "What all these features have in common, what really makes the difference, is a social organization--an organization beyond kinship ties, beyond tribe or family entities. This is what makes government and civilization possible."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Syria
KEYWORDS: archaeology; civilizationo; discoveries; early; epigraphyandlanguage; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; habubakabira; hamoukar; harappan; harappans; history; indusvalleyscript; syria; tellbrak; tellhamoukar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 06/03/2002 1:42:03 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam
...back in the good old days, before Islam.
2 posted on 06/03/2002 1:45:43 PM PDT by TADSLOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale,farmfriend,LostTribe,Ernest_at_the_Beach
I wonder when they will stop saying that Mesopotamia is the site of the beginning of civilization? This recent find beats Mesopotamia by a few thousand years.

Lost Civilisation From 7,500 BC Discovered Off Indian Coast
That's 9,500 years old!

3 posted on 06/03/2002 1:50:19 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Check your link on post #3.
4 posted on 06/03/2002 2:00:21 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Yes, and I believe that some of the Mayan ruins are actually thought to be way, way pre-Mayan.
5 posted on 06/03/2002 2:02:33 PM PDT by Stingray51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
But Al-Azm and Gibson argue that the turning point in the development of civilization was not cities and writing originating in Mesopotamia, as commonly held, but deep changes in social structure that happened in more than one place at once.

They're probably right, but if you change the definition of what constitutes civilization you shouldn't be surprised if the inception date gets pushed back a bit as a result, or if the place of origin gets adjusted a bit.

Cities and writing are secondary measures at best. Beer is the signal characteristic of civilization. Can there be said to be civilization without beer? I thought not.

6 posted on 06/03/2002 2:07:16 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Lost Civilisation From 7,500 BC Discovered Off Indian Coast

Do you mean this story?

7 posted on 06/03/2002 2:08:56 PM PDT by facedown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Geologists who have studied the weathering and water erosion on Great Sphinx insist that it is more like 8,000 years old. Egyptologists are not happy with the findings of the rock guys, but of course the 'gyptos base their dates on something I believe is called the "Inventory Stela", which dates from a much more recent dynasty.
8 posted on 06/03/2002 2:16:11 PM PDT by Wm Bach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
What surer sign of civilization can there be? Show me a clerk's rubber stamp and I will agree you have found a civilization.
9 posted on 06/03/2002 2:23:30 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: facedown
Likely meant this :

Lost Civilisation From 7,500 BC Discovered Off Indian Coast

From ANANOVA.

10 posted on 06/03/2002 2:38:37 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Comment #11 Removed by Moderator

To: Gods, Graves, Glyphs;
To find all articles tagged or indexed using 'Gods, Graves, Glyphs'

Click here: 'Gods, Graves, Glyphs'

12 posted on 06/03/2002 2:51:05 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Likely meant this :"

Yup. Thanks Ernest.

13 posted on 06/03/2002 3:00:21 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: facedown
"Do you mean this story?"

Yup. That one too. I made the post and went outside to water my plants. It`s 97 degrees and very dry here.

14 posted on 06/03/2002 3:02:58 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
"Geologists who have studied the weathering and water erosion on Great Sphinx insist that it is more like 8,000 years old. "

You mean this at 9,000 years old?

How Old Is The Sphinx?

15 posted on 06/03/2002 3:08:18 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: orual; joe montana
FYI.
16 posted on 06/03/2002 3:09:40 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Rewriting The "Bible Of Egypyology"
17 posted on 06/03/2002 3:11:45 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wm Bach
Not happy with the findings of the rock guys. The rock guys have also made intereting discoveries about the Black Sea region and have posited that for a time the center of middle eastern civilization was the fresh water lake that was flooded when the natural dam on the Bosporus broke. They are now exploring the ancient shorline, which is under water, for evidence, but it's a slow process using side-scanning sonar.
18 posted on 06/03/2002 3:23:09 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #19 Removed by Moderator

To: colorado tanker
Ballard And The Black Sea
20 posted on 06/03/2002 4:40:48 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson